true but that would take place on a lower level and not on a national level, which is the most dangerous.
the the states are supposed to be the guardian of the constitution, and the keepers of federalism, how is that supposed to take place it they have no interest [which was taken away] to protect in government
Clinton won the CDs represented by both Hurd and McSally. Neither are willing to throw away their career on trump's idiocy .
I wont blame trump because the republican congress failed to deliver
Do you agree with the original constitution on everything ?
And it turns out that the republican congress is even more corrupt than we knew.
At best all you can do is punish the country just to make trump look bad
Exactly.
The congress only cares about itself instead of the country
Nope I can and do hold trump accountable for all his lies and ego driven rhetoric. He is a liar as well as his supporters.
yes, i do because the states created the constitution, which created the federal government and its structure...by the way i know were you are going, but go ahead and try it
Currently, we only have a GOP house applying the Hastert rule and unwilling to try to get DEM votes. If they ever pass anything, they still have to deal with the senate. It's a lot easier being obstructors, isn't it ?
Its a free country
You can blame trump if you want to
Which amendments don't you agree with ?
Ryan does not have to include the democrats
but he will have to humble himself to compromise with his fellow republicans
i agree with the 14th however it being used improperly against people and business.
repeal the 16th 17th, and get rid of the....... federal reserve act[federal law]
this would turn the country around over night and return power to the people, the states, and make the union strong again
Can I count you as a W.J. Bryan/T. Roosevelt progress---ive ?
Do we need yet another 9/11 to steel our resolve and our vigilance? Too steel our common sense?
A wall on the border with Mexico wouldn't have prevented 9/11.
As long as he can get a majority of the majority he can ignore Demicrats.
It'll be sweet for DEMs to make a strong run at Mulvaney's SC-5 beginning with the top two primary on 5/2 .
I'm guessing most members of Congress have looked at a map, and seen because of the Gulf of Mexico that a wall is completely pointless and a huge waste of money. Especially because the current POTUS budget reduces funding to the Coast Guard. lol.. Unless the CG is going to HEAVILY patrol the Gulf a wall is pointless.
But then knowing Trump I'm pretty sure he's never looked at a map, and if he did wouldn't understand what he's looking at.
The tragedy of all this is that Trump supporters will still back him up regardless. If Trump says the moon is made of cheese, they will believe him.
As highlighted by the pro-science march yesterday Trump and Company do not use, are not interested in, do not want research and evidenced based data. That certainly applies to the building a wall. Trump and his followers are not interested in building a wall because studies have determined it to be the best solution. In fact as with all Trump brain farts even the problem is not clearly defined.
Earlier in the thread a Trumper said that the wall will stop tens of millions of illegals coming into the US. Where is the data that supports such a belief? And what does the research say about the downside of building a wall?
Trump's Wall would be a monument to Trump's monumental narcissism, bigotry and stupidity.
Thats a sztrange reply to that quote
I wont blame trump because the republican congress failed to deliver
Except Trump assured his supporters that he was some great deal maker.
well since the republicans had no power to get any legislation thru for 8 years , wouldn't you think they would be eager to work with trump getting as much through as possible
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?