- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,116
- Reaction score
- 33,462
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Former Special Counsel Ken Starr disagrees with the pundits.Former independent counsel Ken Starr said recent legal developments may have been embarrassing for President Trump, but he doesn't believe the president is at risk of indictment or impeachment.
Some Democrats in recent days have upped their rhetoric against Trump, following the release of a sentencing memo for his former attorney Michael Cohen.
The memo says that Cohen made hush-money payments to women who allegedly had affairs with Trump, and those payments were made “in coordination with and at the direction of” Trump.
We're nowhere near an indictable offense from what we know, assuming that the president could be indicted," Starr said. "And I don't think we're anywhere near an impeachable offense, given what we now know."
Hatch dismisses allegations of Trump crimes over hush money. Asked if he had any concerns, Hatch said: “The Democrats will do anything to hurt this president.” Told it was alleged by SDNY, Hatch told me: “Okay but I don’t care; all I can say is he’s doing a good job as President”
Hatch added this when asked if he was concerned about allegations. “No because I don’t think he was involved in crimes but even then, you know, you can make anything a crime under the current laws; if you want to you can blow it way out of proportion you can do a lot of things.”
Hatch also told me: “President Trump before he became president that’s another world. Since he’s become president this economy has charged ahead. ... And I think we ought to judge him on that basis other than trying to drum up things from the past that may or may not be true.”
Grassley, the Senate Judiciary chairman, similarly dismisses the federal prosecutors’ argument: “They based it on what a liar says, so it hurts the credibility of it.”
Ken Starr on Trump's Legal Jeopardy: 'We're Nowhere Near' Indictable or Impeachable Offenses | Fox News Insider
Former Special Counsel Ken Starr disagrees with the pundits.
Conservatives no longer get to set the standard for what constitutes indictable and impeachable offenses, since those standards have always been made in bad faith.
To whit:
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1072244175544963073
So when a Conservative dangles some ever-changing standard for what will change his mind, he's lying. After Friday, Conservatives have disqualified themselves from serious discussion.
Is Dershowitz suddenly a conservative? The crime was Stormy and Avenatti extorting Trump.
Is Dershowitz suddenly a conservative? The crime was Stormy and Avenatti extorting Trump.
No, there's no evidence that that happened, esp. to a mafioso like Twump.
Conservatives no longer get to set the standard for what constitutes indictable and impeachable offenses, since those standards have always been made in bad faith.
To whit:
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1072244175544963073
So when a Conservative dangles some ever-changing standard for what will change his mind, he's lying. After Friday, Conservatives have disqualified themselves from serious discussion.
Conservatives no longer get to set the standard for what constitutes indictable and impeachable offenses, since those standards have always been made in bad faith.
To whit:
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1072244175544963073
So when a Conservative dangles some ever-changing standard for what will change his mind, he's lying. After Friday, Conservatives have disqualified themselves from serious discussion.
Read the Senators' tweets. The pretense of some magical "standard" is just that: a pretense.
you alt left radicalists have been saying trump will be locked up for years.
you also said hillary would win by a landslide. your predictions are beyond worthless
No, the standard is that an actual crime has to occur.
False. Read the Senators' statements. They don't care even if they were convinced of a crime. So demanding evidence of a crime is a show of bad faith because they don't care anyway.
I think it would be pretty obvious that you would need a Democratic majority in both the House and the Senate in order to impeach Trump.
There is simply no chance of any Republicans in the Senate voting yes.
Of course it happened. Otherwise there was no reason for Trump to give them a dime.
Is Dershowitz suddenly a conservative? The crime was Stormy and Avenatti extorting Trump.
Conservatives no longer get to set the standard for what constitutes indictable and impeachable offenses, since those standards have always been made in bad faith.
To whit:
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1072244175544963073
So when a Conservative dangles some ever-changing standard for what will change his mind, he's lying. After Friday, Conservatives have disqualified themselves from serious discussion.
The people who obviously don't care are the Democrats who are trying to manufacture a crime where none exists.
I think it would be pretty obvious that you would need a Democratic majority in both the House and the Senate in order to impeach Trump.
There is simply no chance of any Republicans in the Senate voting yes.
Please quote me saying those three things.
Hatch dismisses allegations of Trump crimes over hush money. Asked if he had any concerns, Hatch said: “The Democrats will do anything to hurt this president.” Told it was alleged by SDNY, Hatch told me: “Okay but I don’t care; all I can say is he’s doing a good job as President”
back trackin! lol (laugh out loud) after your hero lady lost, all you radical leftists tried to pretend you didnt like her.
this is too hilarious (cant spell hilarious without hil!) lol (laugh out loud).
youll vote for her again too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?