Kavanaugh vs Blasey - this is real bizarre wtf piece of news

bubbabgone · Sep 17, 2018

Not sure if non-msm forum is the place to put this but here goes ...

It appears Kavanaugh's mother, who was also a judge, presided & ruled in a foreclosure case involving Blasey's parents in the 90's.
How weird is this? Does it mean anything? Is it relevant?

Court System: Circuit Court for Montgomery County - Civil System
Case Number: 156006V Sub Type: FORECLOSURE
Date Filed: 08/08/1996
Case Status: CLOSED
Plaintiff Information
(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Plaintiff is displayed)
Name: UMLIC-EIGHT CORP A NORTH CAROLINA CORP
Address: 7415 PINEVILLE MATTHEWS 1010
CHARLOTTE NC 28200

Attorney(s) for the Plaintiff
Name: PRICE, RICHARD M
Address: PEABODY & BROWN
1255 23RD STREET N.W. #800
WASHINGTON DC 20037
Phone: 202-973-7700

Defendant Information
(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Defendant is displayed)
Name: BLASEY, RALPH G
Address: 17 MASTERS COURT
POTOMAC MD 20854
Name: BLASEY, PAULA K
Address: 17 MASTERS COURT
POTOMAC MD 20854
Issues Information
Issue: FORECLOSURE
Issue: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

....

This is an electronic case record. Full case information cannot be made available either because of legal restrictions on access to case records found in Maryland Rules, or because of the practical difficulties inherent in reducing a case record into an electronic format.

Maryland Judiciary Case Search Disclaimer

Kal'Stang · Sep 17, 2018

Do you think that this is evidence that maybe Christine Blasey is claiming that Kavanaugh raped her in retaliation for this case?

Rexedgar · Sep 17, 2018

Kal'Stang said:
Do you think that this is evidence that maybe Christine Blasey is claiming that Kavanaugh raped her in retaliation for this case?

Dates don't line up; they haven't begun to crawl up her ass.......

bubbabgone · Sep 17, 2018

Kal'Stang said:
Do you think that this is evidence that maybe Christine Blasey is claiming that Kavanaugh raped her in retaliation for this case?

who the hell knows.
but it at least should be a signal to the media that there may be some subterranean stories to investigate. at a minimum she has hooked up with a rather radical attorney and may be radical herself.

chuckiechan · Sep 17, 2018

Kal'Stang said:
Do you think that this is evidence that maybe Christine Blasey is claiming that Kavanaugh raped her in retaliation for this case?

If congress has any balls, which they don't, they would put them both under oath and question them. Also, she and her lawyer need to be asked if she is being paid in anyway - Go Fund Me, etc. And while it's still in fashion, he lawyer's office should be impounded and sifted for evidence of payoff's.

Lastly, we need to decide if going back to high school is such a good idea considering a new generation coming up will be a Google's mercy when it comes to dox'ing as far back as the potential candidates first text, Facebook, or e mail, not to mention social media and comments in forums like D.P.

Redress · Sep 17, 2018

bubbabgone said:
who the hell knows.
but it least should be a signal to the media that there may be some subterranean stories to investigate. at a minimum she has hooked up with a rather radical attorney and may be one herself.

But this is stupid. Really, really totally ****ing stupid. Investigating her will get no one any closer to the truth about her allegations. Her motives in coming forward, whether she is a good or bad person, those have zero bearing on the simple question that does need to be asked: is what she said true or not, or mist likely, unprovable either way. Digging into the accusers past is what tends to dissuade victims from coming forward mo0re often, especially in high profile cases.

Let's imagine a perfect world, the way the system should work. Some one comes forward, and makes a claim about a nominee. The best way, the right way is the let the authorities investigate, and react based on that investigation. Digging for dirt on the accuser is low class, lame and gets no one any closer to the truth.

TobyOne · Sep 17, 2018

If could be that Feinstein withheld the information for two months because Blasey is a raging psycho.

Acadia · Sep 17, 2018

The FBI has given her story a pass and handed it over to be part of Kavanaugh's record.

bubba, there's the parent's foreclosre, and coincidentally, she got her story on record in 2012, when Romney was coming close to getting elected and thwarting Obamacare. Guess who was at the top of SCOTUS list if Romney got elected, who dissented against Ocare?

That's right. Kavanaugh.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/26/holding-court

chuckiechan · Sep 17, 2018

Rexedgar said:
Dates don't line up; they haven't begun to crawl up her ass.......

She's a California psychology professor... what does that tell you? Psychology majors made for great dates in college, as long as you didn't catch anything. LOL

Oh, lets dox her. How many students has she seduced?

PirateMk1 · Sep 17, 2018

chuckiechan said:
If congress has any balls, which they don't, they would put them both under oath and question them. Also, she and her lawyer need to be asked if she is being paid in anyway - Go Fund Me, etc. And while it's still in fashion, he lawyer's office should be impounded and sifted for evidence of payoff's.

Lastly, we need to decide if going back to high school is such a good idea considering a new generation coming up will be a Google's mercy when it comes to dox'ing as far back as the potential candidates first text, Facebook, or e mail, not to mention social media and comments in forums like D.P.

Theoretically I couldn't get elected dog catcher if people saw what I said just on this forum.

PirateMk1 · Sep 17, 2018

Redress said:
But this is stupid. Really, really totally ****ing stupid. Investigating her will get no one any closer to the truth about her allegations. Her motives in coming forward, whether she is a good or bad person, those have zero bearing on the simple question that does need to be asked: is what she said true or not, or mist likely, unprovable either way. Digging into the accusers past is what tends to dissuade victims from coming forward mo0re often, especially in high profile cases.

Let's imagine a perfect world, the way the system should work. Some one comes forward, and makes a claim about a nominee. The best way, the right way is the let the authorities investigate, and react based on that investigation. Digging for dirt on the accuser is low class, lame and gets no one any closer to the truth.

IMO this is a low life bitch who was paid or promised pay, there is no sympathy from me. As far as I am concerned if they are going to thoroughly trash the nominee with out any proof, may as well trash the accuser with the same ferocity. I say let the games begin. How long before the lions devour the accuser, after they are finished with the nominee. People whine about civility in proceedings, we can go back to judge Bork and see what happened to him. There's even a term called Borking, the event was so memorable. If we are going to have uncivilized free for all's then we should do it right, and throw mud on everyone. Let everyone get mud on themselves.

NeverTrump · Sep 17, 2018

TobyOne said:
If could be that Feinstein withheld the information for two months because Blasey is a raging psycho.

chuckiechan said:
She's a California psychology professor... what does that tell you? Psychology majors made for great dates in college, as long as you didn't catch anything. LOL

Oh, lets dox her. How many students has she seduced?

You people are seriously screwed in the head. There is nothing definitive linking her to being a raging psycho, a slut, or someone who seduces her patients. But don't let that get in the way of defending Mr. King Elite Frat Boy.

Acadia · Sep 17, 2018

PirateMk1 said:
IMO this is a low life bitch who was paid or promised pay, there is no sympathy from me. As far as I am concerned if they are going to thoroughly trash the nominee with out any proof, may as well trash the accuser with the same ferocity. I say let the games begin. How long before the lions devour the accuser, after they are finished with the nominee. People whine about civility in proceedings, we can go back to judge Bork and see what happened to him. There's even a term called Borking, the event was so memorable. If we are going to have uncivilized free for all's then we should do it right, and throw mud on everyone. Let everyone get mud on themselves.

I said Kavanaugh was getting Borked a couple weeks ago. It was the moment the first Democrat interrupted his hearing, 7 seconds in.
This has been the biggest ****show in history.

joko104 · Sep 17, 2018

Kal'Stang said:
Do you think that this is evidence that maybe Christine Blasey is claiming that Kavanaugh raped her in retaliation for this case?

What rape is that? There is no allegation of rape.

MrMike · Sep 17, 2018

joko104 said:
What rape is that? There is no allegation of rape.

The Left thinks if they claim that enough... people will believe them.

But nope

joko104 · Sep 17, 2018

MrMike said:
The Left thinks if they claim that enough... people will believe them.

But nope

The allegation has shifted from she went back to a bedroom with a guy, her wearing a bathing suit, and he tried clumsily to take it off - to he raped and tried to murder her.

chuckiechan · Sep 17, 2018

NeverTrumpGOP said:
You people are seriously screwed in the head. There is nothing definitive linking her to being a raging psycho, a slut, or someone who seduces her patients. But don't let that get in the way of defending Mr. King Elite Frat Boy.

Let the dox'ing begin!

https://news.grabien.com/story-somethings-wrong-her-christine-fords-students-savage-her-rev

They are from 2014, so they aren't recent reviews. If she was in any other state she would have been sent packing.

Acadia · Sep 17, 2018

joko104 said:
The allegation has shifted from she went back to a bedroom with a guy, her wearing a bathing suit, and he tried clumsily to take it off - to he raped and tried to murder her.

They need to invoke Hitler and call it a day.

Acadia · Sep 17, 2018

MrMike said:
The Left thinks if they claim that enough... people will believe them.

But nope

What else to expect from Goebbells acolytes?

chuckiechan · Sep 17, 2018

PirateMk1 said:
Theoretically I couldn't get elected dog catcher if people saw what I said just on this forum.

We joke about that, but bonding companies have a way of checking if you care to pay enough.

I can't help but wonder if all of the off shore data breeches, are all in a central server in China or India, and are being used as a resource for employee vetting by domestic interests. Who ever asks a bonding company where they got their information?

BTW:

Let the dox'ing begin!

https://news.grabien.com/story-somet...savage-her-rev

They are from 2014, so they aren't recent reviews. If she was in any other state she would have been sent packing.

TurtleDude · Sep 17, 2018

Kal'Stang said:
Do you think that this is evidence that maybe Christine Blasey is claiming that Kavanaugh raped her in retaliation for this case?

why do people keep using the term RAPE or attempted rape-even if you believe the crap this woman has come up with-it doesn't rise to either

Acadia · Sep 17, 2018

chuckiechan said:
We joke about that, but bonding companies have a way of checking if you care to pay enough.

I can't help but wonder if all of the off shore data breeches, are all in a central server in China or India, and are being used as a resource for employee vetting by domestic interests. Who ever asks a bonding company where they got their information?

BTW:

Let the dox'ing begin!

https://news.grabien.com/story-somet...savage-her-rev

They are from 2014, so they aren't recent reviews. If she was in any other state she would have been sent packing.

The link is suddenly not working...

Acadia · Sep 17, 2018

TurtleDude said:
why do people keep using the term RAPE or attempted rape-even if you believe the crap this woman has come up with-it doesn't rise to either

Because it's inflammatory reductio ad absurdum. You know, he tried to rape AND kill her.:roll:

TurtleDude · Sep 17, 2018

Redress said:
But this is stupid. Really, really totally ****ing stupid. Investigating her will get no one any closer to the truth about her allegations. Her motives in coming forward, whether she is a good or bad person, those have zero bearing on the simple question that does need to be asked: is what she said true or not, or mist likely, unprovable either way. Digging into the accusers past is what tends to dissuade victims from coming forward mo0re often, especially in high profile cases.

Let's imagine a perfect world, the way the system should work. Some one comes forward, and makes a claim about a nominee. The best way, the right way is the let the authorities investigate, and react based on that investigation. Digging for dirt on the accuser is low class, lame and gets no one any closer to the truth.

waiting until after the hearing to introduce this nonsense should preclude it from being heard.

Acadia · Sep 17, 2018

TurtleDude said:
waiting until after the hearing to introduce this nonsense should preclude it from being heard.

And should get Feinstein rebuked for sitting on the "attempted rape and murder".

Kavanaugh vs Blasey - this is real bizarre wtf piece of news

bubbabgone

Kal'Stang

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!

bubbabgone

chuckiechan

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!

TobyOne

I am the pretty one.

Acadia

chuckiechan

PirateMk1

PirateMk1

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015

Acadia

joko104

MrMike

joko104

chuckiechan

Acadia

Acadia

chuckiechan

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands

Acadia

Acadia

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands

Acadia

Kavanaugh vs Blasey - this is real bizarre wtf piece of news

Yo-Semite!

Liberal Fascist For Life!

I am the pretty one.

Exposing GOP since 2015

warrior of the wetlands

warrior of the wetlands

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency