- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Messages
- 44,751
- Reaction score
- 14,410
- Location
- OH
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
So what?Somebody's gotta talk about Kamala. You guys certainly never do. She ain't gettin any attention anymore.
You've all forgotten about her, discarded her like used toilet paper (because that's all she ever was for you)
Just like will happen to Biden after he's no longer in power
Somebody's gotta talk about Kamala. You guys certainly never do. She ain't gettin any attention anymore.
You've all forgotten about her, discarded her like used toilet paper (because that's all she ever was for you)
Just like will happen to Biden after he's no longer in power
Do you have proof she was drunk other than just your opinion of her speaking in that video?Right,
Right, except drunk.
That wasn't during Obama's administration.The Russian Collusion hoax.
Except none of this has anything to do with the comment about Democrats win by cheating.Russian collusion hoax has been proven and paying the FEC fines are evidence of such. Downer's recent agreement with Durham's version of events would indicate the FBI agent at the time (Strzok) made a statement that left out pertinent parts of Papadopoulos's conversation with Downer and made it appear Papadopoulos (why the hell can't his name be Smith) had some inside Russian information when he clearly did not.
Now we know the Dossier was a set-up, Downer and Papa was a set-up and Flynn was a set-up. Now, what does that indicate? Comey knew, Clapper knew, and most certainly Obama knew. He wasn't satisfied with using the FBI to mess with the campaign, he used them to mess with his entire Presidency by sidelining Flynn, who knew where the bodies were buried and messing with Sessions which sidelined his AG. Two people who could have sorted this pile of cards out and made them topple.
Transparency and disclosure, which we are getting know shows the FBI and DoJ to be corrupt as hell. Each new piece that drops just makes them look worse.
Yes, the video.Do you have proof she was drunk other than just your opinion of her speaking in that video?
Why?
The election is over and she lost.
Why do you care what she does now?
Oh, she's the one who's always been the attention-seeker. It's not the other way around.
It's important to unearth the sheer corruption of the Democrat machine which elevated this thoroughly unqualified person for putting them on a pedestal to run the entire country.
I'd say it the other way around -- the Democrat Left are extremely hypocritical to be critiquing the qualifications of Trump's picks after fielding blither idiots like Kamala.You seriously want to talk about being qualified when we all see the quality of the people Trump is picking for his cabinet?
Sooo...now you all are not only dealing with ODS, HDS, BDS...now KDS (Kamala Derangement Syndrome)?This message is brought to you by the Democrat Rehab Committee
Why do you think that shit was floating around the FBI? That is cheating, because its manufactured, its lies. Obama knew it. Clinton knew it. Which is why the Clinton campaign used a cutout to make the payment.Except none of this has anything to do with the comment about Democrats win by cheating.
The begginings of it were during the 2016 campaign even though the Mueller investigation came later. Lat time I checked Obama was still in office untile lat January 2017 and his justice depart was involved.That wasn't during Obama's administration.
The entire theme of the thread, including the OP are lacking in class, agree ?Classy.... not.
NaSooo...now you all are not only dealing with ODS, HDS, BDS...now KDS (Kamala Derangement Syndrome)?
Ok then. Conversely, I can use the video of the president-elect stating magnets don't work underwater as evidence he is an idiot.Yes, the video.
Projection is a powerful thing.Oh, she's the one who's always been the attention-seeker. It's not the other way around.
It's important to unearth the sheer corruption of the Democrat machine which elevated this thoroughly unqualified person for putting them on a pedestal to run the entire country.
You're moving the goal posts. First, you started with Democrats winning only via cheating, but the investigations into Trump were after he had already won. Much of the election fraud claims came during elections, when there was something to win. So by your same logic, the efforts to smear Obama and Clinton by claiming one of them wasn't born in the US and the other was a crook were also the same "cheating", yes? If so, then you'd have to expand the people under this cheating umbrella.Why do you think that shit was floating around the FBI? That is cheating, because its manufactured, its lies. Obama knew it. Clinton knew it. Which is why the Clinton campaign used a cutout to make the payment.
Then they carried out a fake investigation because they knew long beforehand it was fake.
So the Trump led DOJ decided to continue it, yes?The begginings of it were during the 2016 campaign even though the Mueller investigation came later. Lat time I checked Obama was still in office untile lat January 2017 and his justice depart was involved.
So transparent, Russian pederast defender.I wouldn't know -- unlike you, I don't have a fetish for talking about kiddie porn and staying in the know about it, as you seem to
I see that NeCons and Israel lobby don't like Scott Ritter for being outspoken on their corruption, and so they'd have a strong motive to smear him.
He is widely respected for his analysis and commentary. He's a brilliant fellow who gets invited to speak for good reason.
haha, not liking his arguments, so attack the speaker - that's what's transparentSo transparent, Russian pederast defender.
Your speaker is a pederast. You still can't break from him. Repugnant, really.haha, not liking his arguments, so attack the speaker - that's what's transparent
Cute. The Clinton plan was to bring the investigation into the open before the election. You do know that, correct?You're moving the goal posts. First, you started with Democrats winning only via cheating, but the investigations into Trump were after he had already won. Much of the election fraud claims came during elections, when there was something to win. So by your same logic, the efforts to smear Obama and Clinton by claiming one of them wasn't born in the US and the other was a crook were also the same "cheating", yes? If so, then you'd have to expand the people under this cheating umbrella.
All excellent picks so far.You seriously want to talk about being qualified when we all see the quality of the people Trump is picking for his cabinet?
So, if I don't have evidence that anyone was ever drunk, then no one has ever been drunk. That's your reasoning.Ok then. Conversely, I can use the video of the president-elect stating magnets don't work underwater as evidence he is an idiot.
You might be able to tell she was intoxicated by her manner of speech. Judging from content of speech, she's been drunk a long time.The US just elected a convicted criminal as president. Harris giving a speech fully drunk is less embarrassing, since she isn't president.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?