• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Kamala is Asked a Taboo Question

 
He did step down voluntarily. Where is ANY proof he was forced? I'm sure people brought him the data, the polls, the public perceptions that dropped after the June debate. He said in 2019 he'd be willing to do one term. When they showed him Harris would have a better chance...he did the right thing for the country. What would his legacy have looked like if he ran and lost in 2024?

Her name was on the ballot that earned that 14 million extra votes too. And we all knew that a 78 yr old candidate meant a realistic chance of her becoming POTUS...maybe some bitter people cant connect those dots...but it's a fact.

I am enjoying the 🍋🍇 a great deal tho 😁 And the fact that people obviously just swallow that BS whole. I'm sure they're laughing all the way to the bank.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
Rush Limbaugh taught them how it's done.

1. Get up in the morning and read the headlines across many newspapers/websites.
2. Pick the most 'outrageous' stories.
3. Go on the air/online and express your 'outrage.' Do this through humor/mockery whenever possible.
4. Encourage your guests/callers to do the same. Piggyback on their ideas.
5. Lather/rinse/repeat
6. Laugh all the way to the bank as your fans make you rich.
 
What did they ask her?

I notice posts like this are common from MAGA. Posts where the poster is unwilling or unable to express themselves.

Seems to be who Trump appeals to.

They asked her how she became the Democrat nominee without having run as a candidate or received any votes for doing so.

She of course responds with babble -- because she didn't have an answer. She said that people from all over "including Dick Cheney" even endorsed her.

So Dick Cheney's endorsement is apparently what Kamala cites as her validation.


I'm pretty sure nobody from the Left liked or used to take endorsements from Dick Cheney -- but apparently for the new "Liberals" (eg. Kamala) this is now important

Meet the new warmongering Woke Left -- who look nothing like the old Left.
 
They asked her how she became the Democrat nominee without having run as a candidate or received any votes for doing so.

She of course responds with babble -- because she didn't have an answer. She said that people from all over "including Dick Cheney" even endorsed her.

So Dick Cheney's endorsement is apparently what Kamala cites as her validation.



I'm pretty sure nobody from the Left liked or used to take endorsements from Dick Cheney -- but apparently for the new "Liberals" (eg. Kamala) this is now important

Meet the new warmongering Woke Left -- who look nothing like the old Left.

Why are you so upset?
 
They asked her how she became the Democrat nominee without having run as a candidate or received any votes for doing so.
Actually, the fly in your ointment is the primaries were over when Biden stepped down. Under your logic, the Dems should not have been allowed to field a candidate at that point.

The primaries had picked Biden, and when Biden stepped down, he immediately endorsed his VP as his replacement. The DNC was held. Harris asked for the nomination. Anyone else also could have asked for the nomination, as well. No one else did. The delegates voted and nominated her to be their candidate. She accepted.

What is the big ****ing deal?
 
Actually, the fly in your ointment is the primaries were over when Biden stepped down. Under your logic, the Dems should not have been allowed to field a candidate at that point.

By my logic, Biden should have stepped down years ago, rather than subject everyone to this farce of a presidency and presidential campaign.

In seeking a new replacement nominee, Dems should have had to go through some transparent multi-candidate process, where the winner would have to earn some kind of mandate to be the nominee.

Just because Kamala has been VP from 2020-2024, it has nothing to do with earning a mandate to be the Democrat nominee and appear on the ballot as the Democrat nominee for November.


The primaries had picked Biden, and when Biden stepped down, he immediately endorsed his VP as his replacement. The DNC was held. Harris asked for the nomination. Anyone else also could have asked for the nomination, as well. No one else did. The delegates voted and nominated her to be their candidate. She accepted.

What is the big ****ing deal?

You can't transfer your mandate via endorsement. That's just BS you're spontaneously making up in the moment.
Show me where that's ever been done before.
Kamala did nothing to earn any mandate -- she just got declared nominee by some clandestine backroom brokering by Obama.
Who the hell is Obama? He holds no office in the govt nor in the party. This was just arranged by a club of cronies without consulting the broader mass of registered Democrat voters.

In her reply to the question posed to her, she even says Dick Cheney endorsed her.
So Dick Cheney is now some arbiter for legitimacy in the Democratic Party? He's not even a Democrat himself.
She's just a complete idiot giving an idiotic answer -- but that's beside the point.
 
By my logic, Biden should have stepped down years ago, rather than subject everyone to this farce of a presidency and presidential campaign.

In seeking a new replacement nominee, Dems should have had to go through some transparent multi-candidate process, where the winner would have to earn some kind of mandate to be the nominee.

Just because Kamala has been VP from 2020-2024, it has nothing to do with earning a mandate to be the Democrat nominee and appear on the ballot as the Democrat nominee for November.




You can't transfer your mandate via endorsement. That's just BS you're spontaneously making up in the moment.
Show me where that's ever been done before.
Kamala did nothing to earn any mandate -- she just got declared nominee by some clandestine backroom brokering by Obama.
Who the hell is Obama? He holds no office in the govt nor in the party. This was just arranged by a club of cronies without consulting the broader mass of registered Democrat voters.

In her reply to the question posed to her, she even says Dick Cheney endorsed her.
So Dick Cheney is now some arbiter for legitimacy in the Democratic Party? He's not even a Democrat himself.
She's just a complete idiot giving an idiotic answer -- but that's beside the point.

It's called political strategy and it worked very well. And was all perfectly acceptable procedure. The complaints are just 🍋🍇 And I dont see many Democrats complaining, do you? Biden and the party choosing the best chance to retain the WH? That IS their job, and seems like people are onboard.

The timing waited until after the June debate when there was some pretty serious data and public perception had gotten negative. So: time it to steal DonOld's thunder immediately after the RNC convention and he'd already picked his VP. Let's face it...DonOld thought he had it won...and this knocked him...and his followers...on his/their asses. The rage from both hasnt stopped since :D It totally threw DonOld's campaign off-track. (y) Mission accomplished. Now we just hope it was enough.

☮️🇺🇸☮️
 
By my logic, Biden should have stepped down years ago, rather than subject everyone to this farce of a presidency and presidential campaign.

In seeking a new replacement nominee, Dems should have had to go through some transparent multi-candidate process, where the winner would have to earn some kind of mandate to be the nominee.

Just because Kamala has been VP from 2020-2024, it has nothing to do with earning a mandate to be the Democrat nominee and appear on the ballot as the Democrat nominee for November.




You can't transfer your mandate via endorsement. That's just BS you're spontaneously making up in the moment.
Show me where that's ever been done before.
Kamala did nothing to earn any mandate -- she just got declared nominee by some clandestine backroom brokering by Obama.

Who the hell is Obama? He holds no office in the govt nor in the party. This was just arranged by a club of cronies without consulting the broader mass of registered Democrat voters.

In her reply to the question posed to her, she even says Dick Cheney endorsed her.
So Dick Cheney is now some arbiter for legitimacy in the Democratic Party? He's not even a Democrat himself.
She's just a complete idiot giving an idiotic answer -- but that's beside the point.
1968. VP Humphrey did not run in any Democratic primaries. He had no intention of seeking the presidency. Then the presumptive nominee, who led with more primary wins, was gunned down in Los Angeles, Humphrey went to the DNC in Chicago and won the nomination. He lost in the general election to Richard Nixon.

Why is it the only people who are whining about Harris being the Democrats' nominee are Republicans? Where is the outcry from the alleged 'disenfranchised' Democratic primary voters? The party rank and file are far more engaged and enthusiastic than they ever were with Biden.

I think this is a manufactured 'controversy' created by people who fear Harris could wipe the floor with the old orange guy.
 
By my logic, Biden should have stepped down years ago, rather than subject everyone to this farce of a presidency and presidential campaign.

In seeking a new replacement nominee, Dems should have had to go through some transparent multi-candidate process, where the winner would have to earn some kind of mandate to be the nominee.

Just because Kamala has been VP from 2020-2024, it has nothing to do with earning a mandate to be the Democrat nominee and appear on the ballot as the Democrat nominee for November.




You can't transfer your mandate via endorsement. That's just BS you're spontaneously making up in the moment.
Show me where that's ever been done before.
Kamala did nothing to earn any mandate -- she just got declared nominee by some clandestine backroom brokering by Obama.
Who the hell is Obama? He holds no office in the govt nor in the party. This was just arranged by a club of cronies without consulting the broader mass of registered Democrat voters.

In her reply to the question posed to her, she even says Dick Cheney endorsed her.
So Dick Cheney is now some arbiter for legitimacy in the Democratic Party? He's not even a Democrat himself.
She's just a complete idiot giving an idiotic answer -- but that's beside the point.
Another Trump supporter ignorant of how BOTH parties nominate a candidate.
 
1968. VP Humphrey did not run in any Democratic primaries. He had no intention of seeking the presidency. Then the presumptive nominee, who led with more primary wins, was gunned down in Los Angeles, Humphrey went to the DNC in Chicago and won the nomination. He lost in the general election to Richard Nixon.

Why is it the only people who are whining about Harris being the Democrats' nominee are Republicans? Where is the outcry from the alleged 'disenfranchised' Democratic primary voters? The party rank and file are far more engaged and enthusiastic than they ever were with Biden.

I think this is a manufactured 'controversy' created by people who fear Harris could wipe the floor with the old orange guy.
Let's not forget how the way that Trump got his own primary rules changed made it nearly impossible for him to lose the nomination. By November 2023, all he had to do was win 94 counties, plus take the states he already led by wide margins in. I want to do a project using 2016 rules and see how much more competitive the primary would have been.
 
They asked her how she became the Democrat nominee without having run as a candidate or received any votes for doing so.

She of course responds with babble -- because she didn't have an answer. She said that people from all over "including Dick Cheney" even endorsed her.

So Dick Cheney's endorsement is apparently what Kamala cites as her validation.



I'm pretty sure nobody from the Left liked or used to take endorsements from Dick Cheney -- but apparently for the new "Liberals" (eg. Kamala) this is now important

Meet the new warmongering Woke Left -- who look nothing like the old Left.
Why do you care.
 
By my logic, Biden should have stepped down years ago, rather than subject everyone to this farce of a presidency and presidential campaign.

In seeking a new replacement nominee, Dems should have had to go through some transparent multi-candidate process, where the winner would have to earn some kind of mandate to be the nominee.

Just because Kamala has been VP from 2020-2024, it has nothing to do with earning a mandate to be the Democrat nominee and appear on the ballot as the Democrat nominee for November.




You can't transfer your mandate via endorsement. That's just BS you're spontaneously making up in the moment.
Show me where that's ever been done before.
Kamala did nothing to earn any mandate -- she just got declared nominee by some clandestine backroom brokering by Obama.
Who the hell is Obama? He holds no office in the govt nor in the party. This was just arranged by a club of cronies without consulting the broader mass of registered Democrat voters.

In her reply to the question posed to her, she even says Dick Cheney endorsed her.
So Dick Cheney is now some arbiter for legitimacy in the Democratic Party? He's not even a Democrat himself.
She's just a complete idiot giving an idiotic answer -- but that's beside the point.
If you feel that way, then just don’t vote for her
 
They asked her how she became the Democrat nominee without having run as a candidate or received any votes for doing so.

She of course responds with babble -- because she didn't have an answer. She said that people from all over "including Dick Cheney" even endorsed her.

So Dick Cheney's endorsement is apparently what Kamala cites as her validation.



I'm pretty sure nobody from the Left liked or used to take endorsements from Dick Cheney -- but apparently for the new "Liberals" (eg. Kamala) this is now important

Meet the new warmongering Woke Left -- who look nothing like the old Left.
Huh, I thought y'all were up in arms because her administration would be just like the Biden administration?
 
Actually, the fly in your ointment is the primaries were over when Biden stepped down. Under your logic, the Dems should not have been allowed to field a candidate at that point.

The primaries had picked Biden, and when Biden stepped down, he immediately endorsed his VP as his replacement. The DNC was held. Harris asked for the nomination. Anyone else also could have asked for the nomination, as well. No one else did. The delegates voted and nominated her to be their candidate. She accepted.

What is the big ****ing deal?
She's beating trump, that's the big deal. With Biden running they thought for sure they would win, now they know they are in for a loss, that's the difference.
 
By my logic, Biden should have stepped down years ago, rather than subject everyone to this farce of a presidency and presidential campaign.

In seeking a new replacement nominee, Dems should have had to go through some transparent multi-candidate process, where the winner would have to earn some kind of mandate to be the nominee.

Just because Kamala has been VP from 2020-2024, it has nothing to do with earning a mandate to be the Democrat nominee and appear on the ballot as the Democrat nominee for November.




You can't transfer your mandate via endorsement. That's just BS you're spontaneously making up in the moment.
Show me where that's ever been done before.
Kamala did nothing to earn any mandate -- she just got declared nominee by some clandestine backroom brokering by Obama.
Who the hell is Obama? He holds no office in the govt nor in the party. This was just arranged by a club of cronies without consulting the broader mass of registered Democrat voters.

In her reply to the question posed to her, she even says Dick Cheney endorsed her.
So Dick Cheney is now some arbiter for legitimacy in the Democratic Party? He's not even a Democrat himself.
She's just a complete idiot giving an idiotic answer -- but that's beside the point.
If the Dems are OK with it why are you so upset? You got your pick, pathetic as he is.
 
She's just a complete idiot giving an idiotic answer -- but that's beside the point.

Which proves that it does not matter how she answered, your decision was made long before the question was even asked.

Not a taboo question, was answered well.

The fact remains that Biden stepped down on his own accord, baited into doing so by Trump, endorsed Harris, who by convention broker secured the nomination, now has overwhelming base support from the party, leaving Trump as the old man on stage often babbling about whatever he wants to including the junk size of dead golfers.

All you guys have left is insults, hatred, bouts of both vote buying and voter intimidation, and a doom and gloom outlook on everything.
 
Back
Top Bottom