Clearly you do not understand why it is that municipalities do not want to charge their tax payers locally for carrying out federal responsibilities.How is that accomplished in the face of municipal governments that fancy themselves as running a "Sanctuary City?"
If memory serves, there's been a recent ruling that effectively bans that sort of blackmail from Washington when there is no connection between the funding and the called-for action. For example, the Feds can withhold highway subsidies if the given state refuses to agree to a federally approved speed limit. They cannot withhold those same funds if the state opts not to cooperate with immigration officials; there's no nexus.
Even if that were not true, do you really think withholding aid to the poor in order to get immigration law enforcement is a wise move, politically?
I’ll keep that in mind the next time I read about the San Fransisco City Council voting on matters half way around the world.Clearly you do not understand why it is that municipalities do not want to charge their tax payers locally for carrying out federal responsibilities.
Just seems a great deal more straightforward to focus on the border. The executive branch has all the authority is needs and there’s no need to spend all that time convincing far left city councils their position on immigration is wrong.The if-then might not hold up if the Fed is trying to impose local law creating but in this case it’s a mandamus issue because what the Fed is saying isn’t to creat state law but to enforce existing federal law.
If you really want to force the issue do it as a task force. Create the task force, request of the state and locals to supply manpower to work in assistance, under the feds. Like Homeland Security did initially and still does as needed.
Depends, I suppose, on how big a problem the undocumented are perceived to be in that location.
What has to do with not wanting their tax payers to fund work that is the responsibility of the federal government?I’ll keep that in mind the next time I read about the San Fransisco City Council voting on matters half way around the world.
It means the idea that liberal city councils are only declaring their municipalities as "Sanctuary Cities" for budget reasons is laughably absurd.What has to do with not wanting their tax payers to fund work that is the responsibility of the federal government?
Why are they funding the Palestinians through their tax dollars? I know darn well that if I was paying municipal taxes intended for local services and education I'd be really ticked in my police were spending their time doing federal work my taxes were also paying for.It means the idea that liberal city councils are only declaring their municipalities as "Sanctuary Cities" for budget reasons is laughably absurd.
I keep seeing this claim that Harris failed in her duties as Biden's border czar. There's a perspective that she was given the job of fixing the border problem and she failed at it. I assume those who think this is true might want to know that it's actually not true.
Harris was never put in charge of the border or made "border czar," immigration experts said. President Joe Biden tasked Harris with leading the administration's diplomatic efforts addressing the "root causes" of migration in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.
Harris' border work was on 'root causes' of migration; she wasn't in charge | Fact check
The post mischaracterizes Harris' work on migration. She was tasked with leading efforts addressing the "root causes" of migration in Central America.www.usatoday.com
Harris was not asked to be the administration's "border czar" or to oversee immigration policy and enforcement at the U.S.-Mexico border. That has mainly been the responsibility of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and his department, which oversees the country's main three immigration agencies, including Customs and Border Protection.
The facts about Kamala Harris' role on immigration in the Biden administration
In her immigration role, Vice President Kamala Harris has mainly focused on convincing companies to invest in Central America and promoting democracy and development.www.cbsnews.com
But Ms. Harris was not, in fact, appointed border czar, nor was she tasked with addressing the broader problems plaguing the border itself
Why Republicans Keep Calling Kamala Harris the ‘Border Czar’
The misleading phrase is meant to underscore one of the thorniest issues in her portfolio: immigration.www.nytimes.com
Now that we've established the truth of the matter, we can positively identify a few elected officials who have lied to you about it:
And the next time you see Trump or anyone else repeating the claim, you'll know that they're lying to you. Vote accordingly.
Hope that helps!
She is so bad that they have to lie at this point.We've moved on from the meaning of "is?" Semantic gibberish.
You should also read the article and consider carefully this passage (emphasis added):
To claim her only task was to find "root causes" is simply a lie, and either you're going to believe that lie or you are not. It's up to you.
Maybe try actually reading the articles. Harris was tasked with working with the three CA countries to see what could be done to tackle the root cause of migration from within those countries. At no time ever was she assigned any duties related to the day to day or operational control of the border. That remained always with Mayorkas.........you know the guy you tried to impeach for not doing Kamala Harris' job~!!!!!While Harris' title was never formally "border czar", she was put in charge of dealing with the border issue, as is clearly shown in news coverage from 2021. Trying to gaslight the public after the fact into believing otherwise is pure political BS. Somebody is lying, but it's not the Republicans.
She is so bad that they have to lie at this point.
I did read the articles. If the headlines weren't enough, here's some quotes:Maybe try actually reading the articles. Harris was tasked with working with the three CA countries to see what could be done to tackle the root cause of migration from within those countries. At no time ever was she assigned any duties related to the day to day or operational control of the border. That remained always with Mayorkas.........you know the guy you tried to impeach for not doing Kamala Harris' job~!!!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?