• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kamala Harris Admits To Being Discriminatory

Not a very nice way to treat Tim Walz.

Real leaders stand by their people, and they certainly don't throw them under the bus in order to make a for-profit memoir more spicy.
I believe that Trump does this routinely.
 
So sorry you are offended by this politician evaluating an election in actual political terms. :rolleyes:

I suppose you also believe that J.D. Vance was the most qualified candidate for the MAGA party...no political considerations taken into account? Of course we know for MAGA it had to be White and it had to be Male and it had to be Straight. So that made it easier.
@Moderate Right wasn't offended. This is nothing but another Maga deflection away from Trump's Epstein problems.
Decisions like this are made routinely in politics.
 
IMO, if winning in 2028 is the objective, then Democrats should worry less about the demographics of their candidates and more about the policies advocated by their candidates.
And Republicans need to be very worried about supporting a likely pedophile POTUS.
 
Last edited:
Wrong about what, specifically?

Wrong that Mayor Pete would have lessened her chances at victory? No, she absolutely was not.

I happen to think she's probably right, but I don't know what value comes from writing about it in a book.
 
I happen to think she's probably right, but I don't know what value comes from writing about it in a book.


Money, would be my first guess. Beyond that, I'm not sure - the people who wouldn't vote for that theoretical ticket certainly won't be shamed into changing their position - they're shameless.
 
Back
Top Bottom