• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files

Greenbeard

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
25,922
Reaction score
33,361
Location
Cambridge, MA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Well, duh, the guy doesn't have much of a poker face and has been telegraphing this for weeks through his flailing.

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files

Anyway, hoax, no files, Obama, etc.
 
"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."

End of story. End of thread.
 
So why is Trump so defensive about releasing Epstein-related stuff?
I don't see him as "defensive". I see him as dismissing something that is irrelevant.
 
I don't see him as "defensive". I see him as dismissing something that is irrelevant.

If it is all irrelevant, then he should have nothing to worry about.
And if he has nothing to worry about, he should have no problem releasing them.

Yet, he has a problem with releasing them to the point where he goes on SM & rants that it is a hoax created by Obama or Biden or Lizard people or whatever.
 
Not so fast.
Do you know the content of those records do not show any wrongdoing?
If there was something there, it would have been used long ago by the Democrats.
 
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.

You know, spin, speculation, innuendo, lies...the usual Trump hating nonsense.

There's no reason to feed the Trump hating beast.
 
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.
Then it sounds like this is a great opportunity for Trump to clear his name by releasing the unredacted documents!
 

My statement still stands: if it's not a problem, he shouldn't have a problem with releasing them.
 
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.

Indeed, it's like the old saying goes: "Better to remain obstructive and be thought a pedoconservative than to release the files and remove all doubt."
 
Then it sounds like this is a great opportunity for Trump to clear his name by releasing the unredacted documents!

What ever documents that are NOT part of the GF preceding's have been released.

Where do think CNN got this story from.

 
Indeed, it's like the old saying goes: "Better to remain obstructive and be thought a pedoconservative than to release the files and remove all doubt."
It's nothing like that. I've already explained it.
 

And is now bringing up Hillary's emails, again, and Obama & Biden & the Russian 'hoax'. Trying as hard as they can to distract from this.
 
"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."

End of story. End of thread.


Certainly not, why being in a room with Epstein with a teen girl being raped is not a sign of wrong doing.

Why next it will be the girl asked for it right,
 
Perhaps trump had a gay/bro love with Clinton?
 
I see him as dismissing something that is incriminating.
What makes you think there's anything incriminating?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…