- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,922
- Reaction score
- 33,361
- Location
- Cambridge, MA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a “truckload” of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump’s name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told. Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing.
In a statement to the Journal on Friday, Bondi and the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, said nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution. “As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings,” they said.
"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."
End of story. End of thread.
Do you take your copium after every meal or just before bed?"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."
End of story. End of thread.
Not so fast."Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."
End of story. End of thread.
I don't see him as "defensive". I see him as dismissing something that is irrelevant.So why is Trump so defensive about releasing Epstein-related stuff?
I don't see him as "defensive". I see him as dismissing something that is irrelevant.
If there was something there, it would have been used long ago by the Democrats.Not so fast.
Do you know the content of those records do not show any wrongdoing?
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.If it is all irrelevant, then he should have nothing to worry about.
And if he has nothing to worry about, he should have no problem releasing them.
Yet, he has a problem with releasing them to the point where he goes on SM & rants that it is a hoax created by Obama or Biden or Lizard people or whatever.
Well, duh, the guy doesn't have much of a poker face and has been telegraphing this for weeks through his flailing.
Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files
Anyway, hoax, no files, Obama, etc.
Then it sounds like this is a great opportunity for Trump to clear his name by releasing the unredacted documents!The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.
You know, spin, speculation, innuendo, lies...the usual Trump hating nonsense.
There's no reason to feed the Trump hating beast.
The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.
The WSJ?Well, duh, the guy doesn't have much of a poker face and has been telegraphing this for weeks through his flailing.
Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files
Anyway, hoax, no files, Obama, etc.
It's nothing like that. I've already explained it.Indeed, it's like the old saying goes: "Better to remain obstructive and be thought a pedoconservative than to release the files and remove all doubt."
I don't see him as "defensive". I see him as dismissing something that is irrelevant.
If it is all irrelevant, then he should have nothing to worry about.
And if he has nothing to worry about, he should have no problem releasing them.
Yet, he has a problem with releasing them to the point where he goes on SM & rants that it is a hoax created by Obama or Biden or Lizard people or whatever.
"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."
End of story. End of thread.
Perhaps trump had a gay/bro love with Clinton?The problem with releasing them is what we see right now. Someone says Trump's name is in the files and everyone spouts off about this being something bad.
You know, spin, speculation, innuendo, lies...the usual Trump hating nonsense.
There's no reason to feed the Trump hating beast.
What makes you think there's anything incriminating?I see him as dismissing something that is incriminating.
When did that happen?Certainly not, why being in a room with Epstein with a teen girl being raped is not a sign of wrong doing.
What girl?Why next it will be the girl asked for it right,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?