• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

just a bunch of people having fun, watching cars burn

j brown's body said:
Indeed. The right-wing needs to make it about isolated acts of violence to get support for turning the military on civilians.
Click to expand...
Well that's the problem. do you think it's okay to kill people and destroy things that don't belong to you?

It's perfectly okay to March down the streets saying "hey hey ho ho the Constitution has to go ". Nobody cares about that it's stupid and irrelevant.

So a bunch of people want to waste their lives doing stupid irrelevant things that's their business.

The second you throw a molotov cocktail or a brick that's when the thunder comes down on you.

That's the way it should be so what you're saying is the right is doing what they should do. The left is trying to promote the burning down cities and killing people.

Don't you find it interesting that anytime these sorts of riots have happened in the last couple of years there have been pallets of bricks delivered just to random parts of the street?
 

As you have pointed out, people are more impressed by the entertaining, isolated incidents of violence than by the boring fact that 1000s are marching peacefully.
 
j brown's body said:
As you have pointed out, people are more impressed by the entertaining, isolated incidents of violence than by the boring truth that 1000s are marching peacefully.
Click to expand...
It's the violence that deserves a response.

Bunch of idiots screaming idiot slogans doesn't.

You're allowed to say I believe stupid things you're just not allowed to kill people or burn stuff for it.
 
CLAX1911 said:
It's the violence that deserves a response.

Bunch of idiots screaming idiot slogans doesn't.

You're allowed to say I believe stupid things you're just not allowed to kill people or burn stuff for it.
Click to expand...

It tells a fraction of the story.
 
CLAX1911 said:
The story is the violence.

A bunch of virtue signaling idiots is never a story. It's a desperate cry for attention.
Click to expand...

The story is that the citizens of Los Angeles don't want ICE coming in and taking away their friends, neighbors and workers.

That's why he sent them into LA with Dr. Phil's camera crew. He knew it would blow up the town. It's 10% undocumented. They're an integral paty of the city.

He essentially declared war against an American city.
 
j brown's body said:
The story is that the citizens of Los Angeles don't want ICE coming in and taking away their friends, neighbors and workers.
Click to expand...
That's not a story.
j brown's body said:
That's why he sent them into LA with Dr. Phil's camera crew. He knew it would blow up the town. It's 10% undocumented. They're an integral paty of the city.
Click to expand...
No he sent them in with the camera crew because the media is stupid.
j brown's body said:
He essentially declared war against an American city.
Click to expand...
An American city that wants to usurp American sovereignty.
 

No one is above the law.

Democrats love doxxing.
 
VanceMack said:
Dood...seriously...why do you do this to yourself?
Click to expand...
Good question to ask yourself since you flail so much.

VanceMack said:
He cant usurp a mayors power when there was no crisis in effect. He offered the troops in the PLANNING stage...and the rat retards you support refused them.
Click to expand...
Yet once there was unrest, who called requesting the NG be deployed?

VanceMack said:
This just keeps getting worse.

so I'ma do you a favor...................probably way too long a time in coming........

into the box.
Click to expand...
Feel free to toss yourself in there, I'm good thanks.
 
ElChupacabra said:
Yes, and no one is debating that...
Click to expand...


Well, I'm certainly debating that assertion.

Trump told his people he wanted enough protection in place to make sure HIS RALLY was safe from protestors. Even the Republican led House committee report says so:


Milley: “The President just says, ‘Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protestors here on the 6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.’… [POTUS said] I don’t care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it’s safe.' [SecDef] Miller responds by saying, 'Hey, we’ve got a plan, and we’ve got it covered.'”


Transcripts Show President Trump's Directives to Pentagon Leadership to "Keep January 6 Safe" Were Deliberately Ignored

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration
cha.house.gov


Trump's own people decided not to bring in NG troops until hours after the Capitol was breached. The end.
 
trumptman said:

No one is above the law.

Democrats love doxxing.
Click to expand...

You're applauding the intimidation of free speech. Wow.

Showing the location of ICE isn't doxing.

A free people have a right to know what law enforcement is up to.
 
TobyOne said:
Clown. Most of the media wait for dog whistles from liberals. In this case the mayor and the governor. But the LAPD police chief says they are "overwhelmed". Too many people having fun I guess.

Click to expand...
Not a good look
 

He was also fine with them being armed.

Trump knew crowd at rally was armed yet demanded they be allowed to march

Cassidy Hutchinson, aide to ex-chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified former president didn’t care people had guns on them
www.theguardian.com
 
Fair point, but you know what's coming right? "THOSE WEREN'T TRUMPS OWN PEOPLE!"
 
Let's add some actual active duty troops to the mix, shall we?



 
Once people start destroying property, they lose any understanding or sympathy from me.
 
holbritter said:
Once people start destroying property, they lose any understanding or sympathy from me.
Click to expand...

I agree, if you're talking about suffering the consequences of their (rioters/vandals) actions.

Property destruction doesn't give the government carte blanche to ignore laws that apply to government actions, though.
 
j brown's body said:
You're applauding the intimidation of free speech. Wow.

Showing the location of ICE isn't doxing.

A free people have a right to know what law enforcement is up to.
Click to expand...

Doxxing isn't free speech.
 
holbritter said:
Once people start destroying property, they lose any understanding or sympathy from me.
Click to expand...

Sure, but we're probably talking about 5 or 10 out of thousands.
 
trumptman said:
Sounds like you'll be defending all the people doxing him in that thread.

Two way street.
Click to expand...

It just sounds like I know what words mean.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…