- Joined
- Mar 15, 2021
- Messages
- 4,112
- Reaction score
- 2,941
- Location
- Washington State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The judge will be overruled. Florida doesn't not have to allow mail-in ballots at all. Alaska doesn't. Only those voters who have personally requested an absentee ballot are allowed to mail in their ballots, nobody else. Furthermore, drop boxes require supervision in order to verify chain of custody. If the State chooses not to provide that supervision, then those drop boxes - and all the ballots they contain - become invalid and are tossed into the trash.
In the infamous words of the first Democrat President Andrew Jackson, "The courts made their decision, now lets see them enforce it."
I don't agree with your assessment. Biden may indeed get to appoint more Supreme Court justices, but it depends on who controls the Senate. Obama did not get consent from the Senate for his nominee to the Supreme Court, for which the nation should be very grateful. It is unlikely that Biden will have another Supreme Court nominee accepted by the Senate after this coming November election, so this is really his one and only shot and it will not change the composition of the court. Biden is replacing one leftist POS with another leftist POS.If these cases reach the Supreme Court, I hope at least 5 Justices will agree that these laws are not aimed at any particular group.
These laws simply wish to ensure honest elections.
It seems, however, that the Dems will eventually get to appoint more Justices to the Court during the Biden years and if the Dems win the White House in 2024.
So those laws will eventually be declared unconstitutional because of the zeitgeist in this nation.
When they have a polling station established on base, absolutely. However, most military votes are cast via absentee ballot.Are military and overseas votes "supervised"?
So chain of custody is a problem?When they have a polling station established on base, absolutely. However, most military votes are cast via absentee ballot.
I voted absentee twice when I served in the Marine Corps from 1972 until 1980. In November of 1972 I was just graduating boot camp, and in November 1976 I was in 14 Area of Main Side, Camp Pendleton, CA. Although my vote was included with the State of Nebraska at the time, because that is the State where I originally enlisted.
The judge will be overruled. Florida doesn't not have to allow mail-in ballots at all. Alaska doesn't. Only those voters who have personally requested an absentee ballot are allowed to mail in their ballots, nobody else. Furthermore, drop boxes require supervision in order to verify chain of custody. If the State chooses not to provide that supervision, then those drop boxes - and all the ballots they contain - become invalid and are tossed into the trash.
In the infamous words of the first Democrat President Andrew Jackson, "The courts made their decision, now lets see them enforce it."
hmm? the judge is an Obama appointee-doesn't mean his ruling is improper but if the judge was say a Trump appointee, then the ruling would have more gravitasdupe
Do you want to know a secret TD??? This ruling will STAND... I shit you not... It will get fast-tracked... By the 2022 midtermshmm? the judge is an Obama appointee-doesn't mean his ruling is improper
but if the judge was say a Trump appointee, then the ruling would have more gravitas
voter suppression laws-hmmm. that sounds like loaded languageDo you want to know a secret TD??? This ruling will STAND... I shit you not... It will get fast-tracked... By the 2022 midterms
Even the Supreme Court will uphold it... This is their "Get Out of Jail Free" card. to clean up Roberts's ****ed up decision in the Supreme Court decision in Shelby V holder voting rights??? On June 25, 2013, the United States Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to use the coverage formula in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act to determine which jurisdictions are subject to the preclearance requirement of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, Shelby County v. Holder, 133 S. Ct... Roberts will reverse himself, and bring another rePuke with him...
The SCOTUS can not let all these new Voter Suppression bills stand... It would destroy America...
-peace
Yes, by their superiors.Are military and overseas votes "supervised"?
Yes, by their superiors.
If you read the ruling carefully, which I did, it reeks of Roberts's inputs and collaboration...voter suppression laws-hmmm. that sounds like loaded language Call it what it is...
You apparently didn't get the memo. Anyone who disagrees with leftist filth is automatically a "racist." That is the only meaning the term has.
they voted tRump out...As usual, Democrats say black voters are too poor or stupid to vote.
Bullshit.If these cases reach the Supreme Court, I hope at least 5 Justices will agree that these laws are not aimed at any particular group.
These laws simply wish to ensure honest elections.
It seems, however, that the Dems will eventually get to appoint more Justices to the Court during the Biden years and if the Dems win the White House in 2024.
So those laws will eventually be declared unconstitutional because of the zeitgeist in this nation.
they voted tRump out...
took the house and the senate
-peace
any more questions???
How many Trump appointed judges have ruled against his policies, lies, appeals, etc? More than a few.hmm? the judge is an Obama appointee-doesn't mean his ruling is improper but if the judge was say a Trump appointee, then the ruling would have more gravitas
that really has nothing to do with what i stated, does it. we do know that GOP judges are more likely to rule against their party than dem judges areHow many Trump appointed judges have ruled against his policies, lies, appeals, etc? More than a few.
Why is that? Are you implying they are less biased?that really has nothing to do with what i stated, does it. we do know that GOP judges are more likely to rule against their party than dem judges are
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?