- Joined
- Dec 2, 2015
- Messages
- 16,568
- Reaction score
- 7,253
- Location
- California Caliphate
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I am a bit sorry she sugar coated it rather than telling us what she really thinks!:mrgreen:It was noted elsewhere that only a federal prosecutor could have granted Brian Pagliano his immunity. The FBI does not have prosecutors so they requested the immunity from a Justice Department prosecutor. So that means the Justice Dept is cooperating to an undisclosed degree. The attached video, sums up Hillary's rapidly shrinking "cone of peril".
Judge Jeanine: Hillary simply can't take the pressure | On Air Videos | Fox News
It was noted elsewhere that only a federal prosecutor could have granted Brian Pagliano his immunity. The FBI does not have prosecutors so they requested the immunity from a Justice Department prosecutor. So that means the Justice Dept is cooperating to an undisclosed degree. The attached video, sums up Hillary's rapidly shrinking "cone of peril".
Judge Jeanine: Hillary simply can't take the pressure | On Air Videos | Fox News
The money was given to assist with earthquake relief in Haiti, the foundation said. At the time, Algeria, which has sought a closer relationship with Washington, was spending heavily to lobby the State Department on human rights issues.
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.
She's counting on you, Jack!JumpinJack said:The facts indicate otherwise. So far, she's good. I haven't seen it reported anywhere but Fox that she's in trouble for some vague sort of reason. What, I don't know. I know the Republicans are trying. We've been to this rodeo before in the 1990s. The Republicans are tenacious, I'll give 'em that. They have a personal thing against the Clintons for some unknown reason. They spent millions of our tax dollars in the 90s trying to make various slime they threw against the wall stick. Yawn.
She's counting on you, Jack!
I guess we should just all pack up and go home, and let the Clinton Foundation act as "off the books" government leverage against other countries who sell favors. At least the money stays in the family, so to speak.
Clinton Email Probe Recalls Past Scrutiny Over Classified Information
But few top officials ever face criminal prosecution for breaking the rules or the laws on classified information. There's a reason for that, according to secrecy expert Steve Aftergood.
STEVE AFTERGOOD: There's a hierarchy. The secretary of state, for example, has been personally delegated presidential authority to decide what is classified and what can be declassified. Someone who's two or three tiers below her in the bureaucracy does not have that same authority.
...
MELISSA BLOCK, BYLINE: The Justice Department's inspector general has found that Alberto Gonzales mishandled top secret documents.
JOHNSON: Investigators said Gonzales improperly stored notes on some of the most sensitive issues in the George W. Bush presidency - the detainee interrogation program and the warrantless wiretap program.
But no one outside the government apparently got their hands on the materials, and the Justice Department declined to prosecute him. That makes sense to former prosecutor Amy Jeffress.
AMY JEFFRESS: There are many other alternatives for people who violate these rules, and criminal punishment should only be used in the, you know, most serious cases.
JOHNSON: That means, she says, targeting officials who had a bad intent for charges that carry jail time. And there are big questions about whether the FBI will find that bad intent in the Clinton case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?