• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Diane Goodstein’s Home Burns to Ground After Ruling Against Trump

Because had she been home, perhaps she would have been able to prevent or extinguish a fire?

Perhaps an arsonist waited for her to leave?
No. This automatically places her on the suspect list. If she had bad intent for her family, then what better time when someone is threatening you, to have investigations go elsewhere? You can bet this is on some investigators minds.
 
No it doesnt. Thank you for revealing you didnt read it though.

View attachment 67593450

View attachment 67593451

It even has the link there that takes you to the original source: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey/data/tables.html#cycle4.0

Funny how you ended up doing the thing you first accusmes me of doing, not reading. What do you call that? Hypocrisy?


Youre arguments are so full of shit. Why is that?
What is the margin of error in this poll? When it is not published, I ignore the poll.
 
What is the margin of error in this poll? When it is not published, I ignore the poll.

You can find all the technical information on all of their surveys here: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2024/demo/hhp/cycle01.html

Where is your citation for this claim:
Shockingly high percentage given what a tiny tiny percentage of the population transgenders make up. It must be like .001% or something like that.

Or did you just make shit up again
 
Status of the DOJ's being given access to SC voter roll information:


...Then Crooks sued, Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein issued a temporary restraining order that blocked the state from handing over this information, and the governor got involved.

Gov. Henry McMaster requested to intervene in the case and asked the state Supreme Court to overturn the lower court’s order, which it did Thursday, saying Goodstein erroneously issued the restraining order.

The high court also tossed the plaintiff’s request to subpoena the governor.

“The SEC will continue working with the DOJ to develop a formal memorandum of understanding that ensures any data sharing is conducted in full compliance with the law while protecting the privacy of South Carolina voters,” the State Election Commission said in a statement Thursday evening....

``````````````````````````````


A South Carolina circuit court judge has denied a motion to stop the release of state voter data to the Department of Justice, meaning that data is free to be released to the federal agency.

Circuit Court Judge Daniel Coble issued a decision on Oct. 1, denying plaintiff Anne Crook's move for a temporary injunction to stop the release of her data to the DOJ on the basis of a privacy violation....

“Today’s victory will help maintain the public’s confidence in the security and integrity of our state’s voter rolls and elections," Brandon Charochak, a spokesman for the governor, stated....

```````````````````````````````

I'm not sure why sharing all this information with the Department of Justice is considered a win re maintainng the "security and integrity" of the state's voter rolls....
 
I look at that before. Nowhere in that and the poll assembler do I see a margin of error. It is not there.

There's an entire section where they go over their entire methodology. If you cant be bothered to read it yourself or dont understand it that's a you problem.

1000017455.webp

BTW, what was the margin of error on the poll you saw that said they were 0.01%
 
There's an entire section where they go over their entire methodology. If you cant be bothered to read it yourself or dont understand it that's a you problem.

View attachment 67593591

BTW, what was the margin of error on the poll you saw that said they were 0.01%
Again, there is no margin of error stated. I take no poll serious that does not publish this basic info.
 
Back
Top Bottom