Rogue
Conspiratist
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2006
- Messages
- 608
- Reaction score
- 53
- Location
- North Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
His name is George.
Well, Perderse, I started calling him Jorge when he started pandering to illegal aliens on an almost daily basis.
So are all illegal immigrants named Jorge? Or is that another shot at the Mexican community.
I agree with you on this one. We shouldn't be doing this. On immigration, I almost always agree with the conservative right - but it's the racist like you that make me question that.
Why is calling him Jorge in any way differant from calling him George, aside from being wrong?
Makes you sound ignorant.
Well, Perderse, I started calling him Jorge when he started pandering to illegal aliens on an almost daily basis.
The President is getting ready to sign an agreement that will deal a death knoll to the social security trust fund and you make some moronic comment about racism? Liberals like you are part of the problem.
I've already told you. No comment on the topic of the thread?
Because I agree with you that this is bothersome.
Well, for someone planning to make Mexico and the USA (along with Canada) into one happy countryroll: ) this isn't such a major surprise. I, like most Americans who aren't brainwashed, believe that this is absolute crap and needs to stop immediately. I wonder how long it will take the real conservatives to put up or shut up about immigration - tell Bush you won't take this kind of crap anymore or stop complaining that your country and your jobs are being stolen by illegal aliens. Despite my normally radical liberal leanings, I have full support for the conservative opinion on this one - build a wall and man it with the military, the part of the military armed with weapons they know how to and can use. Of course a warning should be given first, but if the would-be illegal immigrant decides to ignore the warnings, I've got no great trouble with the border guards using those weapons, to be honest.
My best wishes go out to the true Americans in the Minutemen organization that tries its best to force the authories to react to this wanton invasion of our once-great nation.
Why does it bother you to be against giving social security benefits to illegals?
SomeNebulousSource said:The Title II programs are insurance against poverty and are essential to the protection of people with disabilities. The programs are unique in providing benefits to multiple beneficiaries and across multiple generations under coverage earned by a single wage earner's contributions.
"Taxation Without Representation"
Totalization of Social Security is not uncommon; but, totalization with Mexico has, by all professional opinions, been deemed an act of American stupidity.
Why does it bother you to be against giving social security benefits to illegals?
Workers are vested in the US Social Security System after ten years, Type II claims are available after 18 months.American stupidity seems to be coming to be the NORM rather than the exception.
perhaps I misread. I disagree with giving social secrity to illegal immigrants.
Generally, but in the more classical sense of liberals that actually believe in freedom. Not the neo-liberals, a la Democrats, who are against some of our most fundamental freedoms in this country (like the right to bear arms, free speech and equality).Are you sure that you're a radical liberal?
Oh, I know many are, but I'll bet most of them voted Republican anyway - even though they ought be voting for a party that represents their views.I guess there is a little overlapping in liberals and conservatives depending on the subject. You think that some conservatives aren't telling Bush we aren't going to take his crap anymore?
Of course not. He has a very long running rule of not listening to sound advice.You think that Bush actually listens?
No kidding. He's a globalist like most of the powerful people in this country sadly are.Arguably one of the worst and most devisive Presidents this country has had, he seems to be stubornly stuck on his messianic mission of creating a North American Union, whether we want it or not.
Probably because he knows the Dems will greet him with open arms, considering his policies on many issuesHe is even willing to ruin the Repubican party if he could only achieve this goal.
Probably because he knows the Democrats will greet him with open arms, considering his policies on many issues
The Democratic leadership thinks Bush is the Anti Christ. But, I do think that Bush and the Democratic leadership can get touchy, feely on the issue of amnesty. The Democrats for the votes and Bush for his dream of a NAU.
Jorge Bush is poised to sign the US-Mexico Totalization agreement allowing illegal aliens to get Social Security benefits after only 18 MONTHS of ILLEGAL employment in the U.S., further burdening a system on the brink of collapse.
.......
I was just kidding, but Bush does seem to swing to the so-called "left" on plenty of issues (like the size of government, gun-grabbing, internationalism, and, obviously, immigration).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?