• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jon Stewart is educated by Ezra Klein on Government Regulation

Airyaman said:
Sorry, but Elmo is already too far embedded and reliant on the US government. Time to get him farther away.
Click to expand...

That's right. Let these people go without so democrats can feel good about themselves. That's what matters.
 
jmotivator said:
What you failed to realize is that the fixes Ezra Klein is talking about will require eliminating government jobs...

Republicans are just up front about it.
Click to expand...

Yes, Republicans are sick sociopathic freaks. Government jobs are jobs that need to be done to keep society functioning. They also sustain entire families. Finally, they are more important than 90% of private sector jobs.
 

A garbage service that could become vaporware, and requires sending expensive space junk into orbit. Canada shut down a 100 million contract with Starlink. Hopefully it will go into proper infrastructure.

jmotivator said:
Not in remote locations. And the cost of maintaining a 5G tower is closer to $50k annually, which only makes fiscal sense when that tower is serving 50,000 users not 50.
Click to expand...

Oooo $50k, or one barely middle class income. LOL. What's $50,000 divided by 50? $1000 a YEAR. That's less than I pay for internet. Starklink would cost several times that, excluding the enormous setup cost.

Please make this harder for me. I get bored easily.



I not an expert, I'm just more of an expert than you.
 
Dans La Lune said:
Yes, Republicans are sick sociopathic freaks. Government jobs are jobs that need to be done to keep society functioning. They also sustain entire families. Finally, they are more important than 90% of private sector jobs.
Click to expand...

LOL!! And by Sick Sociopaths you mean telling you that in order to make government more efficient we will need to end some federal jobs?

Your idiotic admiration for "government job" as a concept, rather than actually questioning if specific Government jobs are necessary is just so very progressive of you.

Private sector people lose their jobs every day when the consumer public decides with their wallet that their job is no longer necessary.

This is why private sector is efficient and public sector is not.
 
Dans La Lune said:
A garbage service that could become vaporware, and requires sending expensive space junk into orbit.
Click to expand...

You wouldn't be a progressive if you didn't curb stomp your own arguments...

You: Precocious Government Workers have families and... puppies.. and orphans and stuff how dare you talk about downsizing YOU SOCIOPATH!!

Also You: I've decided that a globally successful Satellite internet company is trash because my emotions are more important than facts. BURN IT ALL DOWN!!

Dans La Lune said:
Canada shut down a 100 million contract with Starlink. Hopefully it will go into proper infrastructure.
Click to expand...

Canada has made a lot of shit decisions in the last 10 years. It's why their GDP has been stagnant since COVID.

Dans La Lune said:
Oooo $50k, or one barely middle class income. LOL. What's $50,000 divided by 50? $1000 a YEAR. That's less than I pay for internet. Starklink would cost several times that, excluding the enormous setup cost.
Click to expand...

You really are having a hard time noodling this, aren't you? If that tower serves 10 homes due to how remote they are, then the cell provider would need to charge them each $417 a month just to cover the cost of the tower maintenance before they get into the bandwidth and other costs.

Again, cell providers have all done the math, and that is why there is little to no cell service in remote rural towns.

Dans La Lune said:
Please make this harder for me. I get bored easily.
Click to expand...

I keep trying to give your the data so that you can think harder if you want, but you keep not understanding it.

Dans La Lune said:
I not an expert, I'm just more of an expert than you.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHA!!!! Unfortunately for you, you have exposed the falsehood in that statement all on your own. I didn't even need to say anything.
 

Why is Starlink successful? Because it is a government contractor.

jmotivator said:
Canada has made a lot of shit decisions in the last 10 years. It's why their GDP has been stagnant since COVID.
Click to expand...

I'm less concerned with infinite growth than I am with government providing services to its people. And what is America's economy even based on at this point? Make Number Go Up?


You originally said 50. Nice moving of the goalposts. Will you reduce it to 1 person per cell tower in your follow up?

jmotivator said:
Again, cell providers have all done the math, and that is why there is little to no cell service in remote rural towns.
Click to expand...

The Post Office can deliver mail for under a dollar to rural towns for a reason. Can you guess the reason?

jmotivator said:
I keep trying to give your the data so that you can think harder if you want, but you keep not understanding it.
Click to expand...

I gave you the numbers and the comparisons between Starjunk and 5G.

jmotivator said:
HAHAHAHA!!!! Unfortunately for you, you have exposed the falsehood in that statement all on your own. I didn't even need to say anything.
Click to expand...

You decide your own level of participation.
 
jmotivator said:
LOL!! And by Sick Sociopaths you mean telling you that in order to make government more efficient we will need to end some federal jobs?
Click to expand...

Wow, there's still people who actually believe this.

jmotivator said:
Your idiotic admiration for "government job" as a concept, rather than actually questioning if specific Government jobs are necessary is just so very progressive of you.
Click to expand...

Who determines the necessity of a government job? A South African Apartheid drug-addled Nazi who thinks he's going to Mars? Big Balls? I'm sure the due dilligence went into every decision.

Look, were never going to agree on this. You think society doesn't need government, and thus you have no problem with rich people dismantling it for their benefit. I get it. We have a fundamentally different world view, and we live in completely different moral universes.

jmotivator said:
Private sector people lose their jobs every day when the consumer public decides with their wallet that their job is no longer necessary.
Click to expand...

Because Elon says so.

jmotivator said:
This is why private sector is efficient and public sector is not.
Click to expand...

Post Office vs. FedEx. Or hell, Universal Healthcare vs. Commercial Healthcare.
 
jmotivator said:
A few thoughts:

1) It wouldn't be for "20 people", it would be for a household.
Click to expand...
Yes, because businesses and other organizations with more than 20 people don't exist in rural areas.

jmotivator said:
2) 220 mbps is PLEANTY of bandwidth for 20 people. You don't need 2 gbps, up or down.
Click to expand...
You do, if you have more than 20 people in your business.

jmotivator said:
3) the Rural Broadband project only requires 20 mbps down and 3 up.
Click to expand...
LOL

First of all, that's not the entire "Rural Broadband Project," not even close. It's the USDA's "ReConnect Program." That is only a small part of the total effort. $65 billion was allocated, and only $2 billion goes to the ReConnect Program:



Most of the funding, as you can see, went to the NTIA Broadband Equity, Access, And Deployment (BEAD) Program. States basically wrote their own proposals. Or perhaps you think that a federal mandate to buy just one company's product is somehow better than letting states determine what's best for their constituents?

Second: Surprise! Your blatant attempt to quote mine is an Epic Fail. The USDA most certainly did NOT say that the goal is to get everyone to a minimum of 25 up and 3 down -- what you highly selectively quoted is the official definition of an underserved area. The goal is symmetrical 100mbps. Here's some of the stuff you "conveniently" left out:




jmotivator said:
4) Nobody, and I mean nobody is running fiber to rural homes.
Click to expand...


Surprise! This isn't exclusively about "rural homes," not by a long shot. For example, the ReConnect Program which you quote-mined is eligible for:

• Corporations
• Limited Liability Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships
• Cooperatives or mutual organizations
• States or local governments, including any agency, subdivision, instrumentality of political subdivision thereof
• A territory or possession of the United States
•An Indian Tribe, as defined in Section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. §450b)

By the way, all those applicants? Yeah, the government needs to make sure they're using the grant money properly. That requires... wait for it... a whole Reporting & Compliance system to verify the grants. Notice how something that seems so simple (giving a business a grant to install a terrestrial Internet line) requires all sorts of bureaucracy, in order to meet goals such as "reducing fraud"?

jmotivator said:
Starlink can beat the Rural Broadband contract requirements by a factor of 9 today....
Click to expand...
Please.

Aside from the fact that you blatantly ignored the program's actual goals, the only reason you're saying "Starlink" is because Musk owns it, and you think mentioning it somehow pwns teh libz.

And again, Starlink simply isn't good enough to meet the program's goals. BIPARTISAN goals, by the way.
 
Visbek said:
Yes, because businesses and other organizations with more than 20 people don't exist in rural areas.
Click to expand...

I didn't say there weren't 20 people businesses, I said they don't need 2 gbps internet speeds, because they don't.

The closes thing I have ever come to a scenario like this was a fairly small internet company that hosted rack space for small businesses for internet access. It, however, was chosen because the land sat right on top of a convergence of several internet trunk lines and that company had the permit to tap into it from a nearby ISP hub.

From the outside you'd think this company was sitting out in the middle of nowhere, but that was back in 2002. Today that little rural hamlet of Loudon VA houses pretty a large portion of the internet and sprawls numerous campuses.. but at no time was that site rural by Internet standards.

Visbek said:
You do, if you have more than 20 people in your business.
Click to expand...

No, you don't. Can you come up with a scenario with a business out in the middle of nowhere that current has no broadband options that has 20 employees with a need for constant 2gbps internet speed?

I'd like to have a talk with that company CTO so I can call him a moron.


Nope, the vast majority of the project is down there in that "BEAD" program, which is precisely funding for building out internet Infrastructure in rural areas.

You like to type very long posts based on either purposeful deception, or flat ignorance. In this case you could have saved yourself some embarrassment by simply scanning for the number "42" and and then read what followed.
 
jmotivator said:
Starling doesn't require clear skies.
Click to expand...
All satellite Internet service can be impeded by bad weather, as well as bad "space weather" (i.e. solar flares). Sometimes this can be a simple fix (e.g. wind misaligning the dish).

Another issue is that satellite bandwidth is shared -- meaning slower performance during normal use times (e.g 8AM to 11PM).

The bigger issue, again, is that satellite isn't sufficient for a lot of rural uses.

By the way, it took Starlink 5 years to provide a phone number for customer support, in late 2024.

jmotivator said:
And while we are on that subject, imagine a good ice or wind storm takes out a telephone pole that was run through the woods to your home... how long do you suppose before your service is retored.
Click to expand...
Lots of terrestrial lines are underground, by the way.

jmotivator said:
All you need to do is look to the devastation from Hurricane Helene to see the folly in your argument. They had Starling up and serving survivors almost immediately, long before the power grid was restored.
Click to expand...


What a crock of shit. They didn't "set up survivors immediately" -- do you think they were sending dishes to uninhabitable homes?

No, they just used it as an advertisement opportunity. They charged those hurricane-afflicted customers full price for the hardware, and offered 30 days free, which... they offer to all new customers.

Why do you keep touting Starlink again, and act like no other satellite providers exist...? (Yes, that's a rhetorical question; your motivation is obvious.)
 
jmotivator said:
I didn't say there weren't 20 people businesses, I said they don't need 2 gbps internet speeds, because they don't.
Click to expand...
Unless they do. Again, 200 down / 15 up is not sufficient for lots of businesses and organizations.

jmotivator said:
The closes thing I have ever come to a scenario like this was a fairly small internet company that hosted rack space...
Click to expand...
Wow. Good thing you've worked for every type of business, and aren't biased.

jmotivator said:
No, you don't. Can you come up with a scenario with a business out in the middle of nowhere that current has no broadband options that has 20 employees with a need for constant 2gbps internet speed?
Click to expand...
Lol... OK, how about:
• Schools
• Hospitals
• Doctor's offices
• Manufacturing
• Government offices
• Post offices
• Pretty much anything with more than 20 employees

By the way, more and more businesses -- and individuals -- are relying on cloud services now. That benefits greatly from higher bandwidth, lower latency, and higher reliability, which are hallmarks of... wait for it... terrestrial services, not satellite.

jmotivator said:
Nope, the vast majority of the project is down there in that "BEAD" program...
Click to expand...


Again! You didn't quote the BEAD program. You selectively quoted the USDA ReConnect Program, in a vain attempt to deliberately misrepresent its requirements.

How did you miss the fact that the ReConnect program offers grants for 100 up / 100 down service? I literally pointed to it with an arrow and circled it for you.

jmotivator said:
You like to type very long posts based on either purposeful deception, or flat ignorance.
Click to expand...


Please. Your accusation is merely a confession. You lied egregiously about the program, you got busted, just admit it.
 
I’m just confused on how jmotivator can still post in this thread. The pain from the new asshole he’s had torn must be excruciating.
 
So again, how is this 'Abundance' thing not just repackaged neoliberalism? How many times can you repackage the same product?
 
Dans La Lune said:
So again, how is this 'Abundance' thing not just repackaged neoliberalism? How many times can you repackage the same product?
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's not quite clear.

The general concept is that if government provides an abundance of some basic things, like housing and health care and food, then everyone will love the Democrats.

In theory it seems like some of this involves removing regulations? I have to say, it's really not clear what exactly they are proposing that wouldn't seriously piss off some people. E.g. fixing the housing affordability crisis will require building lots of higher-density housing and enhancing public transportation. However, there's a lot of NIMBYs out there who are (incorrectly) convinced that building a multi-unit apartment at the end of the block will destroy their property values.

Or: The only real way to reduce health care costs is with a true single-payer or socialized system. However, lots of Americans have been brainwashed into thinking that is somehow "evil."

It also seems rather absurd that at a time when Republicans are executing an all-out assault on democracy, with the intention of seizing permanent control of the federal government, that they believe they can get any of this off the ground.

We also know that Democrats have spent years trying to do things that benefit rural communities, for example, but never get credit for it; and Republicans keep screwing rural voters and never get held accountable for it. There may be some good ideas buried in the Abundance Agenda Haze, but I seriously doubt it will produce the results they want.
 
Sam Seder really takes it to Klein's 'Abundance' theory / strategy or whatever it is.

 
Atreus21 said:
That's right. Let these people go without so democrats can feel good about themselves. That's what matters.
Click to expand...
I mean, that's kind of the situation with tariffs right now. Cause economic devastation so MAGA can feel better about factory work.
 
Slartibartfast said:
I mean, that's kind of the situation with tariffs right now. Cause economic devastation so MAGA can feel better about factory work.
Click to expand...

You"ll get no argument from me about that. These tariffs are going to be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal. Such a stupid unforced error.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.