- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 17,873
- Reaction score
- 8,364
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Your words tell us that you don't understand the meaning of "hear say (sic)"
I realize Liberals have problems understanding how the rules of evidence or the law works so I will help you out. Any comment from Dean is nothing but hear say. If you were looking for an expert who's testimony could lead to a conclusion or a charge you would bring in an investigator who actually investigated the crimes. Not a 3rd party nobody from the 70s who's testimony can't provide you with a single crime you could charge someone for.
It shows the real idiocy of the Democratic party to even consider this testimony to have any value.
Dean didn't come forward. He was caught. He was involved with the Watergate burglaries and the Watergate scandal cover-up. Considered to be the "master manipulator of the cover-up" by the FBI he pleaded guilty to a single felony count in exchange for becoming a key witness for the prosecution. This ultimately resulted in a reduced prison sentence, which he served at Fort Holabird outside Baltimore, Maryland.
So lets no try and make some hero out of this guy.
There were at least two seasoned prosecutors on that panel who have obviously read the Mueller report. Along with the now more than 1,000 who signed that letter of condemnation regarding the very conclusive obstruction evidence detailed in Volume II, they all say the same thing: if Trump was not the sitting president, he would be indicted and awaiting trial. The Oval Office is all that stands between Trump and an orange jumpsuit.
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS – DOJ Alumni Statement – Medium
Didn't see anything in there about a Liberal but I couldn't expect you to know the difference. Thanks for making my point.
What exactly is your point? The question was and is about Deans testimony. What does your post have to do with Dean testifying in this hearing?
Your words tell us that you don't understand the meaning of "hear say (sic)"
Wow, such hostility. My point was that Dean was not the only one testifying. Get a grip.
BWWHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!!
Are you ****ing serious man? Do you know what Democrats are? Do you think liberals are voting Trump or something? Good lord man.
Your words tell us that you don't understand the meaning of "hear say (sic)"
Thats all you got from the post? The fact that I didn't adjoin the two words? You couldn't divine the meaning of my post because I made two words out of one?
hearsay
noun
information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.
Which part of "cautionary tale" did you not understand? Or "flawed human being"? He did bad, he owned up, he did some light time at "club fed." He owns his bad behavior, which is more than most of us can claim.
If Democrats really believed Trump had committed Conspiracy or Obstruction, Why would you lead off your Impeachment Hearings with John Dean who was convicted for his cover up in the 1970s Watergate scandal. He is a convicted felon, a CNN commentator, who has compared every president with his and Nixon's criminal activities, has no evidence, was not involved in any investigation, and has no connection to the Mueller report?
Because this is how desperate Democrats have become. Its a joke at best. John Dean was the architect of the Watergate scandal. He was disbarred and sent to prison for his crimes during the Nixon administration.
Democrats don't have the balls to attempt an Impeachment so instead of subpoenaing the first logical witness (Mueller) who is the architect of the report and the lead investigator, or any attorney on the special counsel or any FBI investigator, or any former witness, they bring in a CNN commentator? Unfortunately for Democrats, their asinine attempt to put on this clown show wasn't aired because of the Helicopter crash in New York.
Who are the Democrats going to bring in next, Whitey Bulger? Jerry Nadler is an embarrassment to this country.
I realize Liberals have problems understanding how the rules of evidence or the law works so I will help you out. Any comment from Dean is nothing but hear say. If you were looking for an expert who's testimony could lead to a conclusion or a charge you would bring in an investigator who actually investigated the crimes. Not a 3rd party nobody from the 70s who's testimony can't provide you with a single crime you could charge someone for.
It shows the real idiocy of the Democratic party to even consider this testimony to have any value.
Who are the Democrats going to bring in next, Whitey Bulger?
Gaetz and "Gym" Jordan humiliated themselves yesterday, it was hilarious.
There are no facts or connections between Nixon and Trumps actions. If you mean, Dean thinks Trump was acting like Nixon, that is hearsay. Since Dean did not witness anything Trump did and only got his knowledge from what he has read, heard on the news, or was told by someone else, that makes his testimony hearsay. That is the absolute literal meaning of hearsay.Your words tell the discerning that you refuse to accept the point I made; which is the fact that Dean's testimony was not hearsay but an actual recitation of facts and the connections between Nixon's and Trump's actions.
He has no experience with Trump.Dean's testimony and replies to relevant questions were based on his personal experience and NOT hearsay.
There are no facts or connections between Nixon and Trumps actions. If you mean, Dean thinks Trump was acting like Nixon, that is hearsay. Since Dean did not witness anything Trump did and only got his knowledge from what he has read, heard on the news, or was told by someone else, that makes his testimony hearsay. That is the absolute literal meaning of hearsay.
He has no experience with Trump.
No, that's not hearsay. He was there, directly as a participant and eye witness. He wasn't a '3rd party'
Dems what a complete ****show...with leadership like Nadler Pelosi Schumer Schiff Dems have ZERO chance in 2020...thanks Dems:2wave:
For your information, Most Democrats are not loony Liberals. While all Liberals are Democrat, Not all Democrats are loony Liberals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?