How do we know...The measure has been tampered with to use politically. I am no economist, just a mere truck driver, but even I can smell Bull **** when it is right in front of me...
My thought is sometime in the future we will hear how bad this time in history really was, and how Obama nearly destroyed this country.
Yeah, yeah, yeah....You can stop with that annoying crap now...I saw it the first five times you posted it, and it wasn't impressive then either.
j-mac
If you would prefer not to base your opinions on statistics and known facts, what would you suggest we base arguments upon? Gut feelings and hunches? If you wish to ignore and dismiss statistics in general as lies, then perhaps economics isn't the right subject to discuss.Yep, and as I like to quote from Twain....There are three kinds of lies....Lies, damned lies, and statistics!
Seen the progressive chart before...Don't buy it.
j-mac
If you would prefer not to base your opinions on statistics and known facts, what would you suggest we base arguments upon? Gut feelings and hunches? If you wish to discuss economics, then you probably shouldn't dismiss statistics as viable subject matter.
But what happens if its a statistic i dont agree with!? What do i do then!? I cant handle the truth!
Is the iPad a tax cut?
Who compiled the chart?
Give me a link.
j-mac
If you would prefer not to base your opinions on statistics and known facts, what would you suggest we base arguments upon? Gut feelings and hunches? If you wish to ignore and dismiss statistics in general as lies, then perhaps economics isn't the right subject to discuss.
No, statistics (reliable ones at least) are made up of data streams that have been proven to be viable and time tested, not "gut feelings and hunches."Statistics are primarily based on gut feelings and hunches, just so you know.
I heard Saddam Hussein (whoops I Mean Hussein ObamaI get them mixed up) bragging about this today.............Boy is he clueless.
Jobs recovery suffers setback in March - Yahoo! Finance
By Lucia Mutikani
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Employers hired far fewer workers in March than in previous months, keeping the door open for the Federal Reserve to provide more monetary support for a still sluggish economy.
Ill tell you whats really pathetic is Bush's job growth record...
And yet comparing the same time period in office, Obama has passed less regulations than Bush...
I never moved the goal post, my original question was asking how many jobs bills has the GOP introduced since their recapture of the house in 2010 that aren't solely made up of tax cuts for the rich and deregulation...as of yet, no one has answered my question...
The GOP had 8yrs in office of tax cuts and deregulating the financial markets and how did they work out? I think it's only fair to give Obama the same amount of time...see ya in '16
Where are all the jobs the GOP promised after the 2010 election? Odd once they took over they stopped talking about jobs and turned their attention to the debt ceiling...wonder why that was...hmmmm...
Actually, your original question to me was:
After THAT...you moved the goalposts.
btw, the GOP never had eight years.
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
2001 | -46 | -8 | -67 | -329 | -81 | -236 | -173 | -188 | -267 | -364 | -346 | -207 |
2002 | -151 | -159 | -65 | -96 | -80 | 12 | -95 | -56 | -12 | 108 | -14 | -170 |
2003 | 57 | -157 | -199 | -34 | 19 | -39 | -2 | 32 | 161 | 143 | 37 | 108 |
2004 | 170 | 32 | 299 | 223 | 310 | 94 | 41 | 102 | 152 | 327 | 27 | 133 |
2005 | 95 | 231 | 145 | 346 | 143 | 261 | 280 | 187 | 84 | 96 | 304 | 140 |
2006 | 315 | 285 | 258 | 165 | 7 | 80 | 158 | 145 | 86 | 5 | 189 | 166 |
2007 | 229 | 57 | 172 | 46 | 121 | 61 | -4 | -73 | 20 | 61 | 75 | 47 |
2008 | 41 | -136 | -112 | -215 | -216 | -231 | -259 | -294 | -425 | -480 | -797 | -658 |
2009 | -839 | -725 | -787 | -802 | -312 | -426 | -296 | -219 | -184 | -232 | -42 | -120 |
2010 | -40 | -27 | 141 | 193 | 84 | 92 | 92 | 128 | 115 | 196 | 134 | 140 |
2011 | 119 | 257 | 261 | 264 | 108 | 102 | 175 | 52 | 216 | 139 | 178 | 234 |
2012 | 277 | 233 | 121 |
Ummm, no...go to post #134 and read it again...
Where did the problem go haywire at? Bush...Why are you talking about Bush? Haven't you heard? There's a new Sheriff in town...has been for almost four years.
Oh, wait...never mind... Im not a liberal.. :roll:Oh, wait...never mind...it's that old liberal tactic: deflect.
Where did the problem go haywire at? Bush...
Its called historical analysis to see how and where we are at now...
Oh, wait...never mind... Im not a liberal.. :roll:
Here is the list by month from the beginning of Bush up until now. You should be able to see that starting in March 2010 until now the have been more than 4 million private sector jobs created:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2001 -46 -8 -67 -329 -81 -236 -173 -188 -267 -364 -346 -207 2002 -151 -159 -65 -96 -80 12 -95 -56 -12 108 -14 -170 2003 57 -157 -199 -34 19 -39 -2 32 161 143 37 108 2004 170 32 299 223 310 94 41 102 152 327 27 133 2005 95 231 145 346 143 261 280 187 84 96 304 140 2006 315 285 258 165 7 80 158 145 86 5 189 166 2007 229 57 172 46 121 61 -4 -73 20 61 75 47 2008 41 -136 -112 -215 -216 -231 -259 -294 -425 -480 -797 -658 2009 -839 -725 -787 -802 -312 -426 -296 -219 -184 -232 -42 -120 2010 -40 -27 141 193 84 92 92 128 115 196 134 140 2011 119 257 261 264 108 102 175 52 216 139 178 234 2012 277 233 121
Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
For the shocker if you add all the private sector jobs create from Jan 2001 - Dec 2008 there were 147K job created
And how many have left the work force?
How could that possibly be relevant to this point?
Uhm, because you're telling me how many jobs were created...I'll give ya the 4 million and subtract that from those no longer in the work force.
number of people not in the labor force is at an all time high of 87,897,000. []Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Ummm, actually pbrauer was, not me...only the number of jobs created was in question, hence the chart...did you read the thread?
What use is the number of jobs created when we still have a deficit of people who have completely left the labor force?? You don't think there is a coloration? Ubama brags about the number of jobs created or saved, but we seldom hear how the participation rate has plummeted. Which is actually the only reason that the unemployment rate has gone down the last couple months.
How could that possibly be relevant to this point?
Here is the list by month from the beginning of Bush up until now. You should be able to see that starting in March 2010 until now the have been more than 4 million private sector jobs created:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2001 -46 -8 -67 -329 -81 -236 -173 -188 -267 -364 -346 -207 2002 -151 -159 -65 -96 -80 12 -95 -56 -12 108 -14 -170 2003 57 -157 -199 -34 19 -39 -2 32 161 143 37 108 2004 170 32 299 223 310 94 41 102 152 327 27 133 2005 95 231 145 346 143 261 280 187 84 96 304 140 2006 315 285 258 165 7 80 158 145 86 5 189 166 2007 229 57 172 46 121 61 -4 -73 20 61 75 47 2008 41 -136 -112 -215 -216 -231 -259 -294 -425 -480 -797 -658 2009 -839 -725 -787 -802 -312 -426 -296 -219 -184 -232 -42 -120 2010 -40 -27 141 193 84 92 92 128 115 196 134 140 2011 119 257 261 264 108 102 175 52 216 139 178 234 2012 277 233 121
Top Picks (Most Requested Statistics) : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
For the shocker if you add all the private sector jobs create from Jan 2001 - Dec 2008 there were 147K job created
How could that possibly be relevant to this point?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?