- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Weird, I still can't get a clear response from you on that whole "understanding" thingy...
You said Obama policies are responsible for his GDP results, So Bush's polices are responsible for his GDP results too......except Bush policies are not responsible....or are they...is anyone's?
You tell us.
I know.....just like it caused commodity inflation previously!Great...
U.S. hiring picks up but not enough to sideline Fed
...here comes another round of quantitative easing. Bring on the commodity inflation! Right when the Midwest in the midst of a drought.
You are standing by a contradiction, and you haven't kicked anything but yourself.Stand by the statement, you want to discuss this start another thread and I will be happy to kick your ass further.
The economy is growing at 1.5% and that isn't enough to create employment and that is the responsibility of the Obama economic policies
Bush is responsible for the results just like Obama is responsible for the results today. Leaders cannot delegate responsibility. Bush policies had nothing to do with the results but they are what they are
I know.....just like it caused commodity inflation previously!
kookie ideas!
If I were President, and I should be, I would question having to pass every bill with a super-majority. I would push for compromise...like Reagan. I miss Reagan.
Which part do you miss most? The massive growth of the federal government? The ballooning deficit? Amnesty for illegal immigrants? Arming out enemies and illegally diverting the money? Leaving our marines as sitting ducks in Lebanon and then fleeing just to make sure the message that terrorism works is heard? Ignoring AIDS? Fighting sanctions against the apartheid regime?
Um...DID NOT HAPPEN.It did, printing money devalues the currency. Since commodities are pegged to the dollar worldwide, we have commodity inflation.
Which part do you miss most? The massive growth of the federal government? The ballooning deficit? Amnesty for illegal immigrants? Arming out enemies and illegally diverting the money? Leaving our marines as sitting ducks in Lebanon and then fleeing just to make sure the message that terrorism works is heard? Ignoring AIDS? Fighting sanctions against the apartheid regime?
Which part do you miss most?
Which part do you miss most? The massive growth of the federal government? The ballooning deficit? Amnesty for illegal immigrants? Arming out enemies and illegally diverting the money? Leaving our marines as sitting ducks in Lebanon and then fleeing just to make sure the message that terrorism works is heard? Ignoring AIDS? Fighting sanctions against the apartheid regime?
Um...DID NOT HAPPEN.
Still batting 0.000
The question was "votes", he did not have 60 votes consistently to "control" the Senate.
PS...notice how he keeps avoiding the contradiction on "policy".
I am trying to understand people like you but you make it difficult. What is it about Obama that creates this kind of loyalty? The results just don't warrant it no matter how much you try to blame Bush almost four years later. If Bush had results like Obama you would be outraged as would I. The difference is you ignore the results and still blame Bush. Why since I know you are smarter than this?
No commodity inflation? Could swear its the highest it's been in 30 years. My bad.
:roll:
Here you go again
Harry Reid hasn't passed a budget since April 29, 2009. The IPAD hadn't even been released yet.
iPad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lets see if you can find the effective point.....No commodity inflation? Could swear its the highest it's been in 30 years. My bad.
:roll:
Lower taxes create an atmosphere for positive economic growth. What do you do when you get more spendable income? Does more spendable income translate into more economic activity?
Not when lower taxes only means more $ socked away in hedge funds which is all that has been happening in the upper bracket. Those people spend all the want regardless.
We really don't want or need the top 5% to keep adding to that $40 trillion nest egg, alot of that is used to bid up commoditites instead of being invested in growth and production.
You do realize that those "poor" demonized top 5% have ammased a fortune that is greater than all the money ever created before 1980. Just 15% of that fortune would cut our national debt in half and they wouldn't feel a thing. I think that is what scares them so.
Lets see if you can find the effective point.....
(hint: It's at 11-2010)
US Inflation Rate for Commodities
Obama will continue to polish this turd.
You see a near linear rate of increase since 2003, interrupted by a recession, no spikes or jumps and certainly nothing to indicate any shock. It is no surprise that you once again create something that never happened, thanks for again confirming that.I see that the CPI % doubled from Oct. 2010 when QE2 started, climbed into double digits by Apr 2011 when it leveled off and began to decline in Nov. 2011. Now we are talking about QE3, which will cause investors to get in ahead of the inevitable commodity price increase. Quantitative easing is synonymous with inflation...that is its purpose. That's all fine and dandy if you're a commodities broker or a billion dollar investment firm, as long as you get the timing right. Poor and middle class families suffer when necessities jump in price by 10 to 20% year to year.
You see a near linear rate of increase since 2003, interrupted by a recession, no spikes or jumps and certainly nothing to indicate any shock. It is no surprise that you once again create something that never happened, thanks for again confirming that.
And they don't buy stuff, like private jets, yachts, big homes, resorts, that keep people working. Remember the luxury tax that killed that market puting companies out of work. Yeah keep raising taxes on the rich and you have companies going bankrupt. Further the rich then go put their money overseas. Yep Good idea.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?