• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jim Crow returns Millions of minority voters threatened by electoral purge




And states can't use both because.....

Why do you have your panties in a wad because there exists a more encompassing first pass filter of data for states to use?
 
Paleocon said:
This measure seems to be highly discriminatory against double voters.
Click to expand...
Since a "John Smith existing in Virginia can exclude a John Doublebubble Flying Spaghetti Monster Smith VII with mismatched S.S. numbers I would say no, this does not discriminate against double voters. It discriminates against people with common names.
 
Erod said:
If they have a photo ID or a voter registration card, they'll be fine.

I realize that's like asking for a bone marrow sample, but this is important.
Click to expand...
Some people may potentially be removed from voting rolls with no further research other than first name/last name matches.
 
Last edited:
jmotivator said:
And states can't use both because.....

Why do you have your panties in a wad because there exists a more encompassing first pass filter of data for states to use?
Click to expand...

Why should a state use an organization that is flagging perfectly valid registrations at such an alarming rate? If John Smith voting can flag every single John Smith in the country, what ****ing use is the system?
 

The GOP is smart. They know they can't win on the merits of their platform..... BTW, what is their platform?





Paleocon said:
This measure seems to be highly discriminatory against double voters.
Click to expand...

Given that there is no such thing.... people are advocating legislation for which there is no known problem. Seems like the GOP is advocating FOR unnecessary regulation when it suits them.

The people that tell you that voter fraud is a problem are either disingenuous (they know its about suppression.. which I believe are most of this group) or ignorant (lack critical thinking skills and an appetite for the truth and thus are pawns of the first group).
 
Last edited:

are you saying there are more losers than winners because the GOP appeals to winners and the Dems appeal to losers-and those who want to control them?
 
Deuce said:
Why should a state use an organization that is flagging perfectly valid registrations at such an alarming rate? If John Smith voting can flag every single John Smith in the country, what ****ing use is the system?
Click to expand...

Because it allows the user to then do the middle name filter themselves for possible data entry errors whereas a three-criteria pass would miss them.

If anything, the Al Jeez self search tool only demonstrates how easily you can narrow down a search from the database. I found two John Smiths with unique middle names registered to vote in two states in under 30 seconds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…