JFK assassination researcher John Newman

[Craig234]

Newman has a background in intelligence, and used that to examine known intelligence documents for his first books, Oswald and the CIA, and JFK and Vietnam.

For years, he's been writing a 5-at-least volume set of books titled about the JFK assassination, but mostly about other topics. He's written about the history of the CIA, Martin Luther King, and more.

Hit latest book is volume 4 - Finding Popov's Mole. This is a book I can't recommend to 99% of people, but it's a heck of a book for people who want the topic.

Popov was a KGB agent who defected in place (remained in the KGB) to the CIA in the 1950's, and he revealed that there was a high level mole in the CIA. He didn't know their name, but they were able to leak information on the U-2 among other things.

Newman has new, unique research leading him to suspect the mole, who was never found, was the CIA's top molehunter. It's quite an education on the war between the KGB and CIA during the 1950's. One of the links to the assassination is the theory that this mole created a false hunt for the mole that included sending Oswald to Russia to try to trigger a reaction that would lead to the mole.

The other secondary topic of the book is a history of the US's military and nuclear weapons that is pretty remarkable. We were a lot, lot closer to destroying the world than people realize.

The book is poorly edited, but content you don't find elsewhere.

UNCOVERING POPOV'S MOLE: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY VOLUME IV: Newman, John M.: 9798355050771: Amazon.com: Books

UNCOVERING POPOV'S MOLE: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY VOLUME IV [Newman, John M.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. UNCOVERING POPOV'S MOLE: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY VOLUME IV

www.amazon.com

 

[venice_ca]

Seeing the thread’s title I was afraid this was an announcement that he had died.

I heard John Newman speak after the publication of his JFK and the Vietnam War.

I’ll look for his latest book after I plow through more of my stacks of books to be read.

 

[nvflash]

He's a book salesmen, he writes what sells books.

I've not read any of his books to know if they have any validity to them or if he is just regurgitating other book salesmen's conspiracy theories.

That is the general case with authors of these types of books.

Do his books have full bibliography in them?

 

[joluoto]

But where does this fit on the iceberg?

 

[Craig234]

But where does this fit on the iceberg?

That's not a very helpful list. Did you read the post?

 

[Craig234]

I heard John Newman speak after the publication of his JFK and the Vietnam War.

That was one of the earlier books to answer the topic about JFK's plans in Vietnam, which are now much clearer - and parts of which are discussed a bit in the latest book. It doesn't help how secretive the topic was.

 

[Exquisitor]

Newman has a background in intelligence, and used that to examine known intelligence documents for his first books, Oswald and the CIA, and JFK and Vietnam.

For years, he's been writing a 5-at-least volume set of books titled about the JFK assassination, but mostly about other topics. He's written about the history of the CIA, Martin Luther King, and more.

Hit latest book is volume 4 - Finding Popov's Mole. This is a book I can't recommend to 99% of people, but it's a heck of a book for people who want the topic.

Popov was a KGB agent who defected in place (remained in the KGB) to the CIA in the 1950's, and he revealed that there was a high level mole in the CIA. He didn't know their name, but they were able to leak information on the U-2 among other things.

Newman has new, unique research leading him to suspect the mole, who was never found, was the CIA's top molehunter. It's quite an education on the war between the KGB and CIA during the 1950's. One of the links to the assassination is the theory that this mole created a false hunt for the mole that included sending Oswald to Russia to try to trigger a reaction that would lead to the mole.

The other secondary topic of the book is a history of the US's military and nuclear weapons that is pretty remarkable. We were a lot, lot closer to destroying the world than people realize.

The book is poorly edited, but content you don't find elsewhere.

UNCOVERING POPOV'S MOLE: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY VOLUME IV: Newman, John M.: 9798355050771: Amazon.com: Books

UNCOVERING POPOV'S MOLE: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY VOLUME IV [Newman, John M.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. UNCOVERING POPOV'S MOLE: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY VOLUME IV

www.amazon.com

Kennedy was Lincoln, who was Elisha, to know this one only needs view a picture of Lincoln.

Thus Oswald was Booth, was Herod's wife. Grant was John the Baptist and Elijah. Elisha asked for a double portion of Elijah who was beheaded as John the Baptist. As a lesson, that you're not supposed to ask according to your brother, it is very troublesome. If the Lord should ever offer you a benediction. Proper prayers are, "I only want your causeless devotional service birth after birth." Or, "Wherever I go, may I always be surrounded by devotees."

Marylyn Monroe was not Herod's daughter, they went into the second death thinking it nothing and Booth taking all the merit.

Booth got out of female embodiment.

 

[Craig234]

Kennedy was Lincoln, who was Elisha, to know this one only needs view a picture of Lincoln.

Thus Oswald was Booth, was Herod's wife. Grant was John the Baptist and Elijah. Elisha asked for a double portion of Elijah who was beheaded as John the Baptist. As a lesson, that you're not supposed to ask according to your brother, it is very troublesome. If the Lord should ever offer you a benediction. Proper prayers are, "I only want your causeless devotional service birth after birth." Or, "Wherever I go, may I always be surrounded by devotees."

Marylyn Monroe was not Herod's daughter, they went into the second death thinking it nothing and Booth taking all the merit.

Booth got out of female embodiment.

Once in a while you find someone who speaks calmly with good grammar, but says wildly crazy things. Something about famous people seems to inspire it, JFK especially. I don't know why. It reminds me a little of Chapman and John Lennon.

 

[Exquisitor]

Once in a while you find someone who speaks calmly with good grammar, but says wildly crazy things. Something about famous people seems to inspire it, JFK especially. I don't know why. It reminds me a little of Chapman and John Lennon.

John's stuff inspired me, here's an example: (it's time for another recitation (to make another copy) )

"My Masterbeast"
There was once upon a toy,
From a far away gland,
A cleature of egnormus protrusions.
Breed it did fire,
Into but it didn't go,
The maiden, when the castle wasn't there.
Hand it went into.
Lupen found, Lupen found,
A piece of place, of slappiness.
Oh joy fought Lupen,
Cup and frown, cup and frown,
Handt thad dragdrun wid yer kill.
Sputter it dying.
Watch last words, of him whooze spit hon my land.

 

[Exquisitor]

Once in a while you find someone who speaks calmly with good grammar, but says wildly crazy things. Something about famous people seems to inspire it, JFK especially. I don't know why. It reminds me a little of Chapman and John Lennon.

That JFK was Elisha is not wildly crazy, in fact it is unlikely they were not. Certainly it could be this lesson is acted out in others, but not when you look at Lincoln or wonder where Grant came from. So Lincoln is pretty visible in Kennedy, if you know, and of course, we never know for sure, such a thing would be impolite. Morevover you can see Booth in Oswald, they are both like Herod's wife, who would always move her torso toward her objectives.