Jeanine Pirro, U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, lashed out at Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui after he blasted her office for "too many misfires."
In a hearing on Thursday, Faruqui said that the country was "past the point of constitutional crisis" as the government said it would drop the case against a man accused of threatening the life of President Donald Trump.
Grand juries have declined to return indictments sought by Pirro at least nine times since Trump ordered a federal takeover of policing in Washington, D.C.
"What's to prevent people from just getting rounded up off the streets?" the judge said. "These are people with names and rights!"
Pirro responded by posting a rant on Twitter that did not address Faruqui's complaints.
"Let me tell you about this Judge Faruqui," she wrote. "This is a judge who by his own words is trying to justify felons illegally carrying firearms in one of the most violent cities in America."
"He has repeatedly indicated his allegiance to those who violate the law and carry illegal guns, justifying the possession of these guns and constantly pushing for the release of these dangerous criminals back into our communities," she continued. "This judge took an oath to follow the law, yet he has allowed his politics to consistently cloud his judgment and his requirement to follow the law. America voted for safe communities, law and order, and this judge is the antithesis of that."
This is the best example I have seen in a very long time of mixing perfect amounts of arrogance and incompetence.
9 failed indictments in a month, and of course this isn't HER fault, it is a judge that somehow made the grand juries bounce her bullshit.
It turns out that you really CAN'T indict a ham sandwich. Or a hoagie.
This is the best example I have seen in a very long time of mixing perfect amounts of arrogance and incompetence.
9 failed indictments in a month, and of course this isn't HER fault, it is a judge that somehow made the grand juries bounce her bullshit.
It turns out that you really CAN'T indict a ham sandwich. Or a hoagie.
Schadenfreude is a renewable resource in America.And MAGA Supports this self victim mentality.
"EVERYONE IS BLOCKING TRUMP AND HIS MINIONS, WHO KNOW EXACTLY WHATS RIGHT FOR EVERYONE FROM MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN BECAUSE THEY PROFIT OR SOMETHING FROM BLOCKING THEM OR JUST DON'T LIKE THEM OR JUST BECAUSE!".
This message brought to you by the Small, Limited Government Freedom and Liberty Loving Conservatives.
Trumpists are ****ing actually just out of control children.
This is the best example I have seen in a very long time of mixing perfect amounts of arrogance and incompetence.
9 failed indictments in a month, and of course this isn't HER fault, it is a judge that somehow made the grand juries bounce her bullshit.
It turns out that you really CAN'T indict a ham sandwich. Or a hoagie.
Yeah, that's great. This is a new event.FYI, there are already a couple of threads on the above subject
Not really.Yeah, that's great. This is a new event.
Nah, that's not my thing. I was letting you know there are already two active threads on Pirro's failure to indict or as your article labels "misfires". Your article even mentions nine failed indictments.Please apply to be a moderator if you feel the need to nanny the board.
TIA.
This is the best example I have seen in a very long time of mixing perfect amounts of arrogance and incompetence.
9 failed indictments in a month, and of course this isn't HER fault, it is a judge that somehow made the grand juries bounce her bullshit.
It turns out that you really CAN'T indict a ham sandwich. Or a hoagie.
Professionalism is something that happens in other countries.How professional
Only the best people.
This is the best example I have seen in a very long time of mixing perfect amounts of arrogance and incompetence.
9 failed indictments in a month, and of course this isn't HER fault, it is a judge that somehow made the grand juries bounce her bullshit.
It turns out that you really CAN'T indict a ham sandwich. Or a hoagie.
You know where the report button is.Not really.
I will take it under advisement.Nah, that's not my thing. I was letting you know there are already two active threads on Pirro's failure to indict or as your article labels "misfires". Your article even mentions nine failed indictments.
This is the best example I have seen in a very long time of mixing perfect amounts of arrogance and incompetence.
9 failed indictments in a month, and of course this isn't HER fault, it is a judge that somehow made the grand juries bounce her bullshit.
It turns out that you really CAN'T indict a ham sandwich. Or a hoagie.
Thanks for your attention to this matter.You know where the report button is.
The window for Mean Old Luce accepting complaints has closed.
I will take it under advisement.
You should call her and tell her to get her act together. Then there wouldn't so many threads about her gross incompetence.Not really.
Nah, that's not my thing. I was letting you know there are already two active threads on Pirro's failure to indict or as your article labels "misfires". Your article even mentions nine failed indictments.
Professionalism is something that happens in other countries.
Tell your government to stop making us look bad.
Crazy MAGAt bitch says what?
This is the best example I have seen in a very long time of mixing perfect amounts of arrogance and incompetence.
9 failed indictments in a month, and of course this isn't HER fault, it is a judge that somehow made the grand juries bounce her bullshit.
It turns out that you really CAN'T indict a ham sandwich. Or a hoagie.
Should be more.FYI, there are already a couple of threads on the above subject.
Its left wing jury nullification.This is the one where there is actual video of the assault occurring? And there is supposedly something wrong with Pirro for bringing a case, but not the GJ for ignoring that there is enough evidence to charge?
Yep. Can't possibly be Pirro's fault. Who the hell is she? It's not like she's in charge or something.Its left wing jury nullification.
Then Piro needs to make more compelling cases.Its left wing jury nullification.
Pirro can't be the problem because Trump appointed her. When Trump fires her, then she can be the problem and it was her fault all along.Then Piro needs to make more compelling cases.
This is the one where there is actual video of the assault occurring? And there is supposedly something wrong with Pirro for bringing a case, but not the GJ for ignoring that there is enough evidence to charge?
Since you’re both blaming the grand juries, I assume you agree Pirro is an idiot for wrongfully blaming the judge.Its left wing jury nullification.
<3Thanks for your attention to this matter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?