• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

James O'keefe delivers another haymaker

KLATTU

KLATTU

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
19,259
Reaction score
6,900
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
James O'Keefe

@JamesOKeefeIII
·
Apr 13


CNN Director Charlie Chester: “It's going to be our [
@CNN
] focus. Like our focus WAS to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that's what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be for climate change awareness.”



CNN...Journalism
( smirk)
 
It is mystifying to me that anyone would be unaware that CNN wanted Trump out of office.
 
And every normal person knows they are basically Democrat activists more than journalists. This was just blatant proof.
 
KLATTU said:
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
·
Apr 13


CNN Director Charlie Chester: “It's going to be our [
@CNN
] focus. Like our focus WAS to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that's what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be for climate change awareness.”



CNN...Journalism
( smirk)
Click to expand...
O'Keefe - criminal, scumbag, gas-lighter. It's no wonder trumpists idolize him.
 
KLATTU said:
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
·
Apr 13


CNN Director Charlie Chester: “It's going to be our [
@CNN
] focus. Like our focus WAS to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that's what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be for climate change awareness.”



CNN...Journalism
( smirk)
Click to expand...
O'Keefe...lol. What's next, a thread about the "genius" of Charlie Kirk?
 
KLATTU said:
And every normal person knows they are basically Democrat activists more than journalists. This was just blatant proof.
Click to expand...


Should they aspire to be more journalistic like Fox, OANN and Newsmax? :ROFLMAO:
 
KLATTU said:
And every normal person knows they are basically Democrat activists more than journalists. This was just blatant proof.
Click to expand...

There was proof of it on the TV screen every night and day. Just like there is proof Fox News wanted Trump to win on the TV screen every night and day.

Except CNN has a fact-checker.

I hope I'm not bursting any bubbles here.
 
BlueTex said:
Should they aspire to be more journalistic like Fox, OANN and Newsmax? :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Those 3 vs. CNN,MSNBC,ABC,NBC,CBS and just about every major newspaper in the country
Thank god we have them else we'd basically have state run Dem media.
 
KLATTU said:
Those 3 vs. CNN,MSNBC,ABC,NBC,CBS and just about every major newspaper in the country
Thank god we have them else we'd basically have state run Dem media.
Click to expand...

Fox, OANN and Newsmax prove there is always a market for the delusional...
 
KLATTU said:
Those 3 vs. CNN,MSNBC,ABC,NBC,CBS and just about every major newspaper in the country
Thank god we have them else we'd basically have state run Dem media.
Click to expand...

A list of media groups that use fact-checkers. You can't trust them because they admit error.

What an upside-down world.
 
So( not unexpectedly) we will be seeing a flood (pardon the pun ) of scary climate change stories.
Snow-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Rain-GLOBAL WARMING!!
No rain-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Heat-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Cold-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Storm-GLOBAL WARMING!!
WE Need more Big Government {genuflect} solutions!!!!

Not that that hasn't been happening already but the lw cult has decided to ramp up the fearmongering
 
j brown's body said:
A list of media groups that use fact-checkers. You can't trust them because they admit error.

What an upside-down world.
Click to expand...
To be accurate you should have put 'fact-checkers' in quotes to indicate they really aren't fact-checkers but lw spinmeisters.
 
Well this tread is certainly spinning off the rails.
 
KLATTU said:
So( not unexpectedly) we will be seeing a flood (pardon the pun ) of scary climate change stories.
Snow-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Rain-GLOBAL WARMING!!
No rain-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Heat-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Cold-GLOBAL WARMING!!
Storm-GLOBAL WARMING!!
WE Need more Big Government {genuflect} solutions!!!!

Not that that hasn't been happening already but the lw cult has decided to ramp up the fearmongering
Click to expand...


I think those in fear is pretty obvious... ;)
 
KLATTU said:
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
·
Apr 13


CNN Director Charlie Chester: “It's going to be our [
@CNN
] focus. Like our focus WAS to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that's what it was, right? So, our next thing is going to be for climate change awareness.”



CNN...Journalism
( smirk)
Click to expand...
Every one of the cable "news" outlets have propaganda shows in the evening and 6-9 AM EST mornings. Every. Single. One. of. Them. CNN, Fox News, OANN, Newsmax, MSNBC. Etc. I think you already know that.

You don't even have to catch them on tape secretly, just watch the shows. It's obvious to anyone with more than 2 brain cells.
 
Sadly, to me these things feel like no big deal. CNN’s lean is obvious. Just like the New York Times, and to be fair just like Fox News. People just need to be aware what they are tuning in to, and that is activism, not journalism.
 
James O’Keefe... 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Project Veritas Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of misleading videos and several failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: MediumTraffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History
Founded in 2010, Project Veritas was created by James Edward O’Keefe III who is an American conservative political activist. He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, some selectively edited to imply its subjects said things they did not, with figures and workers in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or allegedly illegal behavior by employees and/or representatives of those organizations. Project Veritas primarily targets liberals and liberal organizations.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
James O’Keefe owns project Veritas. Funding primarily comes from donations. However, most of these donations come from the Donor’s Trust. The purpose of the Donor’s Trust Fund is to “safeguard the intent of libertarian and conservative donors.” In other words, it allows the source to receive funds without disclosing who they come from. Needless to say, most funding for Project Veritas comes from conservative and libertarian organizations.


Project Veritas - Media Bias Fact Check


Fake news. Sorry to those who got suckered into responding.




.
 
swing_voter said:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Project Veritas Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of misleading videos and several failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: MediumTraffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History
Founded in 2010, Project Veritas was created by James Edward O’Keefe III who is an American conservative political activist. He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, some selectively edited to imply its subjects said things they did not, with figures and workers in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or allegedly illegal behavior by employees and/or representatives of those organizations. Project Veritas primarily targets liberals and liberal organizations.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
James O’Keefe owns project Veritas. Funding primarily comes from donations. However, most of these donations come from the Donor’s Trust. The purpose of the Donor’s Trust Fund is to “safeguard the intent of libertarian and conservative donors.” In other words, it allows the source to receive funds without disclosing who they come from. Needless to say, most funding for Project Veritas comes from conservative and libertarian organizations.


Project Veritas - Media Bias Fact Check


Fake news. Sorry to those who got suckered into responding.




.
Click to expand...
Daily chuckle

Nice try
 
swing_voter said:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Project Veritas Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of misleading videos and several failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: MediumTraffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History
Founded in 2010, Project Veritas was created by James Edward O’Keefe III who is an American conservative political activist. He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, some selectively edited to imply its subjects said things they did not, with figures and workers in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or allegedly illegal behavior by employees and/or representatives of those organizations. Project Veritas primarily targets liberals and liberal organizations.
Read our profile on the United States government and media.
Funded by / Ownership
James O’Keefe owns project Veritas. Funding primarily comes from donations. However, most of these donations come from the Donor’s Trust. The purpose of the Donor’s Trust Fund is to “safeguard the intent of libertarian and conservative donors.” In other words, it allows the source to receive funds without disclosing who they come from. Needless to say, most funding for Project Veritas comes from conservative and libertarian organizations.


Project Veritas - Media Bias Fact Check


Fake news. Sorry to those who got suckered into responding.




.
Click to expand...
Shouldn’t you at least have to debate the authenticity of the video?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom