- Joined
- Sep 30, 2013
- Messages
- 70,047
- Reaction score
- 79,617
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Its a conspiracy!!! Bill Gates!!11!!!!
Do your posts ever have a setting other than "crazed"?
Its a conspiracy!!! Bill Gates!!11!!!!The whole world is influenced by the WHO, and the WHO is under the control of Gates, who pushes vaccines.
God AlmightyThe whole world is influenced by the WHO, and the WHO is under the control of Gates, who pushes vaccines.
It works great for some things.
Just not covid.
"28-day in-hospital death in 3 (1.2%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-1.11; P = .09)"
There is a trick that is commonly used to "prove" that a treatment does not work -- you can simply under-power the study. For example, you can make sure the N, the number of subjects, is too small. It looks like that might be true of this study -- 3 died in the ivermectin group, vs 10 in the control group. The probability that this happened by chance was very small, and the difference between groups was quite near statistical significance. If the study were repeated with more subjects, the difference might have been significant.
I suspect that many of the studies "proving" that ivermectin does not work used the same trick. Because most people (including medical doctors) know nothing about statistics, they are easily fooled by bogus research.
The whole world is influenced by the WHO, and the WHO is under the control of Gates, who pushes vaccines.
According to her, "learning all about the pandemic" is her passion.Its a conspiracy!!! Bill Gates!!11!!!!
Do your posts ever have a setting other than "crazed"?
Works about as well as the Covid vaccine on children. No vaccine works about the same on kids. That's what the science says.Ivermectin doesn't work.
She is completely full of you know what when it comes to this subject.According to her, "learning all about the pandemic" is her passion.
And when I asked her for her sources, she made excuses and didnt share anything. Of course, she didnt actually read any books about epidemiology or pandemics...just watched videos, read articles, read studies she has little ability to understand, etc etc.
How can science change as you talked experts claim?That would be you.
Works about as well as the Covid vaccine on children. No vaccine works about the same on kids. That's what the science says.
How else can Billy get those microchips into you if not via vaccines? Ever since my first shot I have had an incredible urge to buy a new version of Windows. It's really bad. Probably going to be uncontrollable after a booster shot.The whole world is influenced by the WHO, and the WHO is under the control of Gates, who pushes vaccines.
India and Peru, for example, came to the same conclusion.Journal of the American Medical Association
Efficacy of Ivermectin on Disease Progression in Patients With COVID-19
This randomized clinical trial assesses the efficacy of ivermectin treatment in preventing progression to severe disease among high-risk patients with COVID-19 in Malaysia.jamanetwork.com
In this randomized clinical trial of early ivermectin treatment for adults with mild to moderate COVID-19 and comorbidities, we found no evidence that ivermectin was efficacious in reducing the risk of severe disease. Our findings are consistent with the results of the IVERCOR-COVID19 trial,17 which found that ivermectin was ineffective in reducing the risk of hospitalization.
I'm sure we'll see all sorts of apologies from the liars that shilled this bullshit right?
Could you explain why a country as strapped for cash as India dropped Ivermectin in favour of more expensive alternatives? I'll help you; because it didn't work! Keep your idiotic conspiracy theories where they belong-far away from normal people. Thanks."28-day in-hospital death in 3 (1.2%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-1.11; P = .09)"
There is a trick that is commonly used to "prove" that a treatment does not work -- you can simply under-power the study. For example, you can make sure the N, the number of subjects, is too small. It looks like that might be true of this study -- 3 died in the ivermectin group, vs 10 in the control group. The probability that this happened by chance was very small, and the difference between groups was quite near statistical significance. If the study were repeated with more subjects, the difference might have been significant.
I suspect that many of the studies "proving" that ivermectin does not work used the same trick. Because most people (including medical doctors) know nothing about statistics, they are easily fooled by bogus research.
Start worrying when the blue light under your skin starts flashing. It's a warning that Bill Gates is about to summon you, electronically, to do his bidding in his plan for world domination. It's true, I read it in the same place as @Good4Nothin.How else can Billy get those microchips into you if not via vaccines? Ever since my first shot I have had an incredible urge to buy a new version of Windows. It's really bad. Probably going to be uncontrollable after a booster shot.
Exactly...Lets face it. The rest of the world, where they don't care what Trump and the US anti Dems think, aren't massively using this comparitively cheap and available drug. Instead spending 100's of $millions more on more expensive treatments. Many of those other countries with medical experts just as good as in the US assessing that Inver doesn't work enough to use as a covid treatment. They don't have any political axe to grind. If it is available, cheap, and actually worked, it would be getting used everywhere.
Oh good grief!The whole world is influenced by the WHO, and the WHO is under the control of Gates, who pushes vaccines.
The gates foundation is literally doing what Jesus Christ would do if he was on the planet. Simply trying to save as many humans from death as possible.More made-up BS. I worked at the Gates Foundation for 2 yrs and they are very focused on vaccines. Why wouldnt they be? They have an entire division, their largest, called Global Health. When I was there the pushes were to get everyone on the planet vaccinated against polio, and they almost made it...politics ****ed it up in Pakistan.
And trying to find a vaccine for malaria. Most of the other stuff is trying to get vaccines to the people where they need them, mostly for kids. It gets hijacked and sold by third world gangs and dictators.
Because most people (including medical doctors) know nothing about statistics, they are easily fooled by bogus research.
Learned it all at the University of Facebook.According to her, "learning all about the pandemic" is her passion.
And when I asked her for her sources, she made excuses and didnt share anything. Of course, she didnt actually read any books about epidemiology or pandemics...just watched videos, read articles, read studies she has little ability to understand, etc etc.
I just shoved a USB port up my ass and turned off tracking. And for when I reminisce out loud, I set my default search engine to Duck Duck Go instead of Bing. I'm back off the grid. I feel much more at ease about my chip now.How else can Billy get those microchips into you if not via vaccines? Ever since my first shot I have had an incredible urge to buy a new version of Windows. It's really bad. Probably going to be uncontrollable after a booster shot.
More than half of all Americans have at least one co-morbidity. 42% have more than four!
Dang, and that’s a big problem!
You have no proof at all that conservatives have the most comorbidities, nor any proof that masks work. I have asked for this a thousand times now. You can prove it very simply by pointing to the states that have far fewer infections per capita because of their mask insistence. No one has done it yet and there are 50 states. How about you being the first to show up your fellow comrades?Even if that were true, which it isn't, conservatives are among the least healthy Americans and have the most comorbidities.
I see you all have fully transitioned from Soros to Gates.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?