The police reportedly accused her of lying within an hour of her first interrogation. How the hell would they know if she was lying at that point?
And there's still no evidence linking her to the crime. Next?
Oh great, let's make this about the faults of America's legal system now...:lol:
I had a great time when I was in Italy but I did not kill anyone....
allegedly being the operative word.
Paul
I heard you do trial by media, but thought till now that it was only hyperbole.
I heard you do trial by media, but thought till now that it was only hyperbole.
..... Or perhaps they simply carried out their duty unhindered by "evidence" filtered through a partisan American media storm.
allegedly being the operative word.
Paul
After being on the end of an interrogation or two, believe me its not an unusual tactic for the Police to go in hard at early stage whilst the suspect is vulnerable, it often gets results.
Let's review:
The lead prosecutor is an occultist who obtained his motive from occultist blogger that supposedly communicates with a dead priest.
The lead prosecutor is under indictment for abuse of office.
The lead prosecutor has a history of over-zealous prosecution.
A key piece of forensic evidence was not collected until six weeks after the murder.
The alleged murder weapon does not match the police composite which was extrapolated from the murder scene.
The jury had full access to senationalistic media reports which were heavily biased against Amanda Knox.
Yea, the Italian justice system sure is "different" from America's.
allegedly being the operative word.
Paul
OMG, you just made me LMAO! :rofl
Exactly......Its amazing that some people caan't see the forest for the trees........
Exactly! And aside from the total lack of evidence, the whole theory is just ridiculous. The prosecutor is asserting that a 20-year-old female with no history of crime, violence, mental illness, or anger management issues convinced two men whom she barely knew (and who didn't know each other at all) to participate in a gang-rape and murder. That hardly sounds like the type of crime that females commit very often. And aside from that, there is no physical evidence linking either Knox or Sollecito to the murder scene.
That video to which you linked was quite informative. I was especially interested in the story of the American writer who the same prosecutor detained in conjunction with another murder. The prosecutor's ridiculous theory about THAT case (a group of people performing a Satanic ritual instead of a lone killer) was almost exactly the same as his theory in this case. He is clearly obsessed with the occult, and fundamentally prefers fanciful theories involving the occult to mundane theories that would stand up to Occam's Razor.
I'm mostly pissed at the media. They were more concerned with sensationalizing the trial than reporting the story objectively; no wonder so many people just assumed she was guilty. Even I assumed as much, until I saw Van Sant on The O'Reilly Factor (yes, I watch sometimes...:3oops:
YouTube- Is Amanda Knox Guilty? Not So Fast! (FoxNews Dec 7 2009)
allegedly being the operative word.
Paul
Have you ignored everything we've been saying so far?
The lead prosecutor obtained his motive from an occultist blogger that communicates with a dead Priest.
HELLO!? Earth to Navy Pride! See the forest, yet?
I'm mostly pissed at the media. They were more concerned with sensationalizing the trial than reporting the story objectively; no wonder so many people just assumed she was guilty. Even I assumed as much, until I saw Van Sant on The O'Reilly Factor (yes, I watch sometimes...:3oops:
YouTube- Is Amanda Knox Guilty? Not So Fast! (FoxNews Dec 7 2009)
I don't want to see anyone wrongfully convicted but this girl is guilty as hell and you are very naive not to see it...........They have conclusive DNA evidence against her.........
I saw this guy om Oreilly and he is a big fan of Knox.......He has no real proof except what he believes that she is innocent.............
No, they absolutely do not have conclusive DNA evidence against her. That is a complete falsehood.
Maybe, instead of taking the drive-by media's word for it, you should conduct some independent research.
Since when is a person expected to prove their innocence? Last time I checked, the burden of proof was on the state.
Perhaps Italy subscribes to your "guilty until proven innocent" theory, too.
I guess I have heard over 100 times they did have conclusive DNA evidence...
I have a flash for you....Young Americans can do bad things when they are overseas and away from their family and loaded with drugs whether you believe it or not.................
This is Italy......different country, different laws.........Let it be a lesson to you......They use to tell us aboard ship when we went ashore... don't get in trouble with the local law.............I had 2 friends who were drunk and caught urinating in public in Turkey........They went to court, found guilty and were locked up........4 years later I saw message traffic trying to get these guys out of jail..........
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?