Proudly Pro Life JP Freem
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2005
- Messages
- 340
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:“it”
it" The Pro Abotionist refer to another human being as "it" It brings to mind the character on the TV show "The Adams Family" You know the guy with the hat and hair down to his feet. Now all you Pro Choice People you are being creepy & spooky,Mysterious and Kooky. Now I'll have that song playing in my head all day. Thinking Cousin "It" is in someones womb. "it" what a ridiculas thought "It" another Human Being. "It" So sad someone can think that way. "it" To all Pro Abortion people were the 5 babies my wife and I lost were they to "it" They all could have been legally aborted? "it' another word for Baby, Human being, in the Pro abortion dictionary. It makes it easier to tear an "it" apart during the abortion process limbs, heart, head, torso ripped to threads "it" is then place in a red Biological waste bag."it" might find "it's' way into a sewer. Anyway "it" died and "it" was killed, Yes "it" was murdered. Suddenly the Adams Family song stop playing stoped playing in my head.
ngdawg said:Agreed there.....and stop reading anti-choice falsehood propaganda....nothing gets ripped apart and tossed in sewers....if you believe that, I have some swampland in New Jersey just waiting to be sold.
Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:It's worth a mint if it's in NJ I have no idea why though.
You are talking to a Bio Medical Engineer The machine is called a suction machine. Most abortions are performed this way. Many Women suffer cervix damage, making them unable to carry a baby if they get pregnant.
We did adopt it took 5 yrs she has scored in the top 1% in the nation in her Scholastic Aptitude test, she is now 11. My wife and I did have a little girl now 5yr old. I wrote the piece some time ago because the board I was on someone kept refering to a baby in the womb as "it" steen in another string steen refered to a baby as "it" That brought it back I gues I am the only one who hears a song and find myself mindlessly humming it or just thinking about the medly. Do you really think thats not normal? Well I do Alley MacBeal had it happening to her all the time on fox yrs ago. Another song that has the same affect is the Beverly Hillbillies. Let me tell you a story about a man name jed....... oil that is black gold.....Sorry folksAurora151989 said:i'm not turning against you jp, but... I think you do need some therapy. I'm sorry your cute babies died, perhaps you could adopt or get a pet?
ngdawg said:Agreed there.....and stop reading anti-choice falsehood propaganda....nothing gets ripped apart and tossed in sewers....if you believe that, I have some swampland in New Jersey just waiting to be sold.
Well, the developmental stage "baby" doesn't begin till after birth, so the way you use it here is merely prolife rethoric and sophistry, revisionist linguistic hyperbole.Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:I wrote the piece some time ago because the board I was on someone kept refering to a baby in the womb as "it"
Where?steen in another string steen refered to a baby as "it"
Nope, that would be embryo in thsi case.Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:Suction Curettage: The mouth (cervix) of the womb is dilated. Sometimes it is damaged because during the pregnancy the cervix is closed tightly to protect the baby.
That would be "uterus."A suction Curette (hollow tube with a knife-like edged tip) is inserted into the womb.
Still no baby, your emotional revisionist linguistic hyperbole none withstanding.A strong suction tears the baby
No more "great" care than any other surgical procedure. And note that abortions are one of the safest surgical procedures there is.into pieces, drawing them into a container. Great care must be used to prevent the womb from being torn and checking body parts to ensure a complete abortion.
steen said:Well, the developmental stage "baby" doesn't begin till after birth, so the way you use it here is merely prolife rethoric and sophistry, revisionist linguistic hyperbole.
Where?
steen said:Nope, that would be embryo in thsi case.
That would be "uterus."
Still no baby, your emotional revisionist linguistic hyperbole none withstanding.
No more "great" care than any other surgical procedure. And note that abortions are one of the safest surgical procedures there is.
BTW, I noticed that to describe medical procedures, you used non-medical prolife sites. Could that be because factual, medical, scientific sites don't use language that is emotionally evocative enough for you?
Ah, so my "it" did NOT refer to a baby like you claimed. So you lied. OK, thanks for clarifying that.Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:From your Reply of Aesome Little Girl.
"It "is not a baby.
Quote:
Is it not a Human being just beging his or her life?
"It "does not have individuality enough to qualify as a "being."
Talking to the mirror again?hey, "it" is not MY fault that youspew false, revisionist linguistic hyperbole instead of truth.
Because they are willing to lie to promote their political agenda of misogynistic, theocratic oppression of women.:dohProudly Pro Life JP Freem said:No I just did a search Type in abortion Damaged cervix then see what you get. Plenty of sites. Most Pro life. Hmmm Wonder why
steen said:Ah, so my "it" did NOT refer to a baby like you claimed. So you lied. OK, thanks for clarifying that.
Talking to the mirror again?
I couldn't care less about your delusions and deceptions. Whan I said "it," I referred to an embryo or fetus, not a baby.Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:steen you did refer to the baby as it Again you said the following.
It "is not a baby. (you said this) you said It meaning baby to me is not a Baby
there is no baby in the womb. I referred to an embryo or fetus, not a baby, so stop your lies about me.Quote:
Is it not a Human being just beging his or her life? (I said this)
"It "does not have individuality enough to qualify as a "being (You said this)
Again you refer to the baby in the womb as "it"
Oh, NOW you back-pedal, pathetically trying to avoid having to admit that you lied while trying to divert.If you do not think there is a baby in womb why not refer to what you think the proper term is instead of "it"
happykat said:You're fighting over the word "it." Gimme a break!
What are you supposed to call something you don't know the sex of?
Wouldn't it be more insulting to some to call a fetus "that well organized group of tissue?"
Some people are sooo closed minded that even a hint of something that is counter to their precious beliefs must be wrong or ignorant or part of some hidden agenda. People like this lose credibility for their argument.
Well, that was about #@$%$#@%$ time. Now, next time don't lie about me again, OK?Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:OK steen whatever you say.
Yes, you made a claim about me and it was false. I am glad you admit this.It is quite clear who is being misleading.
And I take offense to you lying about me. And I take offense at your flagrant misogyny and desire to enslave women. And so on, and so on.Proudly Pro Life JP Freem said:It is very easy for the Pro Abortion people to say "abort it" giving no meanining to the life they are going to kill. I take offense to using the word it to describe someone so prescious.
It is a factual, scientific/medical term. It is not our fault that you didn't learn enough English to know this.Abort is the same kind of word.
huh? No we don't.Again Pro abortionist change the meaning of this word use to mean cancel.
Utter nonsense. You are REALLY showing how illiterate you are. here is the actual definition, curtesy of Stedman's Medical Dictionary:Now it means to kill another human being in the womb
steen said:It is not our fault that you didn't learn enough English to know this.
STOP LYING!
Utter nonsense. You are REALLY showing how illiterate you are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?