How many dead Americans are acceptable to you in your illegal land grab and occupation of Russia?
I'll assuming you will be the first one to enlist?500,000.
But it isn't illegal if the U.S. Congress votes in favor of it. And they will under the right circumstances.
Haven't we been hearing Democrats for years talk about Russian interference in our elections is a hostile act?
Dayton3:
So your madness widens to more countries for thermo-nuclear strikes? Russia possesses more than 10 times the known nuclear arsenal of China.
Evilroddy.
500,000.
But it isn't illegal if the U.S. Congress votes in favor of it. And they will under the right circumstances.
Haven't we been hearing Democrats for years talk about Russian interference in our elections is a hostile act?
Wrong. I can copy the table from online if you want. China has about 320 strategic nuclear warheads. Russia has about 1,430.
Warped reasoning? It is not even reasoning.
And do remember it took the US (wih the help of France and Nato) 5 years to "win" the war in Iraq and I believe that after the US sold out the Kurds to Turkey, Russia can call Syria a win. And now you want the US to take on Russia, China and Iran singlehanded in one sweep? Who are you? Donald Trump?500,000.
But it isn't illegal if the U.S. Congress votes in favor of it. And they will under the right circumstances.
Haven't we been hearing Democrats for years talk about Russian interference in our elections is a hostile act?
Wrong. I can copy the table from online if you want. China has about 320 strategic nuclear warheads. Russia has about 1,430.
They’ve got thousands more in storage. Thousands which would come out of storage and be deployed if the US began any of the bullshit you are espousing.
Dayton3:
As usual, you're wrong. Scroll down to the table for easy contemporary historical learning.
Status of World Nuclear Forces - Federation of American Scientists
Despite progress in reducing nuclear weapon arsenals since the Cold War, the world’s combined inventory of nuclear warheads remains at a very high level.fas.org
Be well and be wiser.
Evilroddy.
And do remember it took the US (wih the help of France and Nato) 5 years to "win" the war in Iraq and I believe that after the US sold out the Kurds to Turkey, Russia can call Syria a win. And now you want the US to take on Russia, China and Iran singlehanded in one sweep? Who are you? Donald Trump?
Your own table verifies basically what I said.
Learn to read.
Well, Maybe you should look at the 2 big narcissistic leaders with hubris that already tried to do what you want the US to do:Iraq is a very poor example. The U.S. walked very softly in its war against Iraq. We could've been far more lethal and killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis in the first month.
That would've tapped things down pretty well.
You're from Belgian aren't you? Another irrelevant country only useful as a base to launch operations into Eastern Europe.
And do remember it took the US (wih the help of France and Nato) 5 years to "win" the war in Iraq and I believe that after the US sold out the Kurds to Turkey, Russia can call Syria a win. And now you want the US to take on Russia, China and Iran singlehanded in one sweep? Who are you? Donald Trump?
So China is about to posses the world's biggest economy soon. What is the USA to do - get better at business ?
Dayton3:
No, you're ignoring non-deployed weapons and launching systems in strategic storage, which could be readily deployed in short order. You're also ignoring other older stockpiled weapon systems which could also be used with a longer lag time. Finally, China has none of its estimated 320 nuclear weapons deployed as they are dispersed and well hidden. I can read and unlike you I have taught history for more than 30 years and during the late 1980's and early 1990's volunteered my time to help instruct Canadian military officers in Soviet tactical, operational and strategic doctrine (albeit with an emphasis on ground and tactical air operations).
I've taught history far more recently. And my area of specialty is the Cold War.
And once again, "non-deployed" weapons also have another term. "not useable in the short term"
We are better at business.
What we haven't been better at is treating China like the enemy it is...
Believeing that normalized relations somehow would change the commies from being sick tyrants and somehow economic prospertity would begin to shape China into acting like a civilized nation was apperenlty wishing for too much. China STEALS everything from the US and the West, and we have let them do it in exchange for crappy Chinese products.
The same back to you.zyzygy:
Respectfully, no. This is bestial, predatory reasoning, albeit at the extreme end of the spectrum. However hundreds if not thousands of military planners actually do the same thing and don't get excoriated for their wickedness because it is hidden behind curtains of secrecy and classification categories. This is the cancer of militarism having metastasised out from behind the curtain for once. It is a symptom of a very pathological mindset spreading through some increasingly pathological Western societies. There are Americans having wet-dreams about killing their own fellow citizens by the millions in a left-right civil war, there are ultranationalist Russians dreaming about covering Western Eurasia in blood and steel and there are Islamist fundamentalists dreaming about bathing the Dar el Harb (the non-Islamic world) in human blood in the service of God. Dayton3 fits right in. He is very human but exceedingly inhumane - man's cruelty to man incarnate. No he fancies he can just blow up Chinese dams to kill and displace millions. It's very depressing really.
Cheers and be well.
Evilroddy.
That takes time.
Dayton3:
Read the footnotes.
Iraq is a very poor example. The U.S. walked very softly in its war against Iraq. We could've been far more lethal and killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis in the first month.
That would've tapped things down pretty well.
And 5,000 ABM’s can be built and emplaced instantaneously?
The Soviets tried brutalizing the population of Afghanistan to get them to stop resisting. How did that work out of them?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?