- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 26,681
- Reaction score
- 23,983
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
To me, it's also become "Rebrand" rather than "Reform" as yet more former Conservatives from the Boris Johnson wing of the party seek to improve their political fortunes by joining REFORM.
It was Tea Party before. It was ignited big time by Ross Perot
I've heard the phrase "Tea Party" but never quite understood what it was. One thing I heard often was that it was people upset that a Black President had been elected?
Ross Perot - another name I've read but not really read up about.
I'll go have a look.
Ross Perot was a billionnaire that can be described as a Trump precursor; nutty, but not quite as nutty. He ran as an independent in 1992, when Clinton won first term. It was a three way pitting Bush Sr, Clinton and Perot. Perot was actually doing well, then paranoia caught up with him, and he dropped out claiming Bush Sr was after him. He came back on, but the fire was gone
Perot was closer to derail either Clinton or Bush Sr than winning himself. The question was always whose voters he'd actually get a larger portion of. He was quite nutty, but not a wingnut, and usually placed himself more as a maverick outsider the right- left divide than as a flanker on either side.Utterly nuts. How close was he to the Presidency before he dropped out?
Utterly nuts. How close was he to the Presidency before he dropped out?
Independent candidates usually do very poorly. In the single digits. Low enough to be insignificant, but enough to cost a candidate an election. The 2000 elections between Bush Jr and al Gore came down to Florida. Ralph Nader who was in the low singles in national polls took enough votes from the left to cost al Gore the elections.
<<<
in the 2000 presidential election in Florida, George W. Bush defeated Al Gore by 537 votes. Nader received 97,421 votes in Florida (and Pat Buchanan and Harry Browne received 17,484 and 16,415 respectively), which led to a general consensus that Nader's campaign took enough votes from Gore in Florida to cost him the election.
When the mounting dissatisfaction of voters goes ignored and unaddressed by all major parties, it inevitably translates into a resurgence of populism, whether right, or left; the UK is a pretty textbook case of this, as is America.To some extent I agree with the Rebrand phenomenon. Sometimes it is argued like Trump created Maga. He did not. That far right segment was always there. It flares, then goes dormant. When reignited from dormancy it is rebranded. Today it is Maga. It was Tea Party before. It was ignited big time by Ross Perot
H. Ross Perots sole purpose was to keep old man Bush from being re-elected. He had a hard on for the guy. He was never a threat to Clinton.Its just the further right of the Republican Party. It never quite gets organised into a formal Party. It goes dormant, then gets reignited, then goes dormant again. When the Republican Party is out of Office the Republican center and left tend to go despondent, while it is the further right that comes to live and is most active.
Ross Perot was a billionnaire that can be described as a Trump precursor; nutty, but not quite as nutty. He ran as an independent in 1992, when Clinton won first term. It was a three way pitting Bush Sr, Clinton and Perot. Perot was actually doing well, then paranoia caught up with him, and he dropped out claiming Bush Sr was after him. He came back on, but the fire was gone
When the mounting dissatisfaction of voters goes ignored and unaddressed by all major parties, it inevitably translates into a resurgence of populism, whether right, or left; the UK is a pretty textbook case of this, as is America.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?