Mickyjaystoned
Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 1
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Iran would never launch on Israel or anyone of our other alies. As long as they claim us as big brother...they are protected. This does not mean that some Palestinian or other Muslim terrorists won't drive across the Israeli border with an Iranian Nuke. It's a pity that the morally decrepit of this world would rather recognize a terrorist nation's right to own nukes and dismiss a peaceful nation's right to survival.
Mickyjaystoned said:Mossad carry out bus bombings to engineer justification for genocide and police brutality directed towards palestinians.
Mickyjaystoned said:In all fairness i don't actually think there is justification for Iran to be called a terrorist state.
Mickyjaystoned said:To suggest a Muslim terrorist group will be the ones to deliver a nuke is actually quite a logical assumption, the thing is however, no nuclear arms will be obtained from Iran all the time there is a stable government there, certain rogue states are the ones to look out for, states like Iraq where terrorist groups could assume control of the state and therefore Nuclear production.
Mickyjaystoned said:America only has itself to blame for this, after the pre war years and varioyus expeditions to various countries America has created Unstable governments and states where terrorists could easily obtain Nuclear weapons. south america, Korea,v, at the moment however there is nothing to worry about unless Israel begins throwing her weight around, Iran will definately IMO make first move towards a war with Israel and her cronies:America and Britain.
Mickyjaystoned said:That said we can't ignore Ahmedinejhad's blatant contempt for Western power and although we should respect his countries right to Nuclear power we must work closely with the UN to ensure the Nuclear program is used for nothing malicious.
GySgt said:This does not mean that some Palestinian or other Muslim terrorists won't drive across the Israeli border with an Iranian Nuke.
Probably as easy as it was to sneak them out of Iraq.Touchmaster said:Exactly how easy do you think smuggling a nuclear warhead into Israel would be?
Touchmaster said:Exactly how easy do you think smuggling a nuclear warhead into Israel would be? And may I see some non-Israeli links regarding Iranian terrorism, as I believe they may be tainted a little by vested interests (Iran being the only state left in the Middle East approaching Israel's power)?
Dont get me wrong, I despise the Iranian government, although human rights abuses under its reign are certainly no worse than the Shah's, but I think it my duty to myself as a curious person to look beyond the propaganda.
Mickyjaystoned said:Yeah whatever GYsgt by all means attack me personally but it is quite obvious that your reality as you call it has completely blinded you to both sides of the Argument.
You have in this post as in many others pledged your allegiance to the state of Israel.
Might i suggest getting financial backing and running for president, i don't even think Bush Jr has had as much to say in defense of his zionist paymasters.
You obviously care so much about Israel that you are willing to call me pathetic and in essence a terrorist because i quite simply do not just accept and regurgitate what Zionist mainstream media tells me.
You are a victim of Jewish Brainwashing, sorry but in your eagerness to defend their every move this is the conclusion i come up with.
Anyway America has created more unstable governments than the one in Iran.
The Iranian government has been reasonably stable despite being the only opposition to American and Israeli invasion of the East, the only thing Iran has done wrong is voice it's disgust at the Zionists, and say what many people think; that Israel as it is should be wiped off the map.
I think Israel needent have made a state so far east after the 2nd war, but hety it's obviously strategic military planning, i well aimed Nuke from Israel could obliterate Islam as we know it.
You pledge allegiance to Israels and Americas agenda, but you don't even know the truth, and you call me pathetic?
You should learn about the religions, political positions, and social issues invloved with the Middle East instead of racing to support anyhting anti- "Zion." You don't know much about Islam and you don't know much about reality.
Mickyjaystoned said:Being anti Zionism really pisses people off, what an incredibly interesting social experiment the internet can be.
GySgt said:As much as anti-Muslim or Anti-Christian or Anti-Hindu.
All religions have a Radical flavor to them, but only one religion is running amok, forming organizations globally, and slaughtering people in the name of God. Sorry, I choose not to bow down to such ignorance and I certainly don't choose to allow them to dictate who my allies are.
Binary_Digit said:Say Gunny, you seem to know more about Middle East history than I do, maybe you can answer a question I have. Not that I completely agree with everything Mickey has said, but I really don't understand the rationale behind Zionism very well.
Think back to 1948. The Jews had been a "people without a nation" for 2000 years, and they had just suffered the most dispicable human rights atrocities in modern history. The UN decided, based on historical and Biblical implications, that the Jews deserve their ancient "homeland" back. So they divided up the region of Palestine (a British colony, right?), and ever since then we've had a Jihad on our hands. The argument is that the Palestinian people have more of a right to that land than the Jews do.
Now I'm not sure why the British had their paws on Palestinian land (assuming it was a British colony, if memory serves), but it seems to me a lot of Middle Easterners don't recognize the UN's right to partition that land and give over half of it to someone who hasn't lived there for 2000 years. From that point of view, it's really no different than if China divided up Texas and let all the Native Americans move there to form their own country. Isn't it?
Touchmaster said:Sorry, now you are just coming across as a bigot. I dislike all organised religions equally, and think its just institutionalised insanity, but how many of the hundreds of millions of Muslims on Earth do you think have anything to do with extremist terrorist groups that attack civilians in the name of religion (as opposed to being standard rebels with agrievance about their homeland, real or perceived)?
GySgt said:"Bigot?"
These texts support a potential for violence not found in other major religions. Radical Muslims account for between 1% to 20% of Islam.
Touchmaster said:Well you have put me at rest that you arent at least branding hundreds of millions of people as barbarian, stupid, murderous,tyrannical savages, but to say that Islam is the only religion that has the propensity to incite violence shows a little ignorance (probably wilful) on your part. have you read the old testament? a truely pacifist document to be sure. I suppose the millions of indigenous Americans that succumbed to genocide in the name of Christ would possibly disagree with you too.
Touchmaster said:Exactly how easy do you think smuggling a nuclear warhead into Israel would be?
Touchmaster said:I hate all fundamentalist religions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?