- Joined
- Aug 19, 2014
- Messages
- 42,346
- Reaction score
- 31,615
- Location
- Tennessee, USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Berghdhal was a prisoner of war exchange...which the US has done since the Revolutionary War.
The young ladies mother and father would likely have a different opinion.
I think everybody diminishes the amount of hatred that the US has attracted by being in the ME and killing folks there for twenty plus years. IS has plenty of recruiting power based upon that alone. Sooner or latter people from that region are going to seek a level of revenge on Americans that dwarfs 9/11. Hatred by people that have been wronged by a very heavy handed invader can be very powerful and motivational.
ooh, ooh, ooh!
What WILL America do?
A handful of Arabs with box cutters stopped the nation for a week and changed life forever. There are now more military and military-equipped police in US streets than any other "free" country. You have been killing those responsible for 13 years with the result that terrorists thought by your president to be just some joyful Arabs happy that he bombed their cities for them assassinated the only Ambassador to be killed in the line of duty in 30 years and got away with it.
You spent what, seven years in Iraq killing terrorists and terrorist sympathizers and now have to back. 13 years with the full resources of NATO for the most of it and Afghanistan is still a training ground for terrorists.
The US dribbling in Kyev caused a regime change, and a war in eastern Europe, the first nation grab since Hitler invaded Poland, a civilian airliner shot down and your president walks away like nothing happened?
Obama promised revenge for this beheading, and now has a hostage crisis. Obviously ISIS is terrified.
So, please, exactly what it is ISIS is supposed to fear here?
And this my fellow Americans is why we DON'T give into ransoms.
Let's take it a step further, shall we? How about, "This is why it's absolutely ****ing retarded to invade a country on fabricated reasons,"? Yeah, much better. The Bush Administration were warned that their actions would cause more hate in the Middle East. And this is ever before it came out that Americans were torturing people. What a big cesspool of mess.
Let's take it a step further, shall we? How about, "This is why it's absolutely ****ing retarded to invade a country on fabricated reasons,"? Yeah, much better. The Bush Administration were warned that their actions would cause more hate in the Middle East. And this is ever before it came out that Americans were torturing people. What a big cesspool of mess.
They hated us before, and they hated us after. You dont appease evil.
So......When are we going to stop blaming Bush? Also I don't recall Bush flying into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon....
Let's take it a step further, shall we? How about, "This is why it's absolutely ****ing retarded to invade a country on fabricated reasons,"? Yeah, much better. The Bush Administration were warned that their actions would cause more hate in the Middle East. And this is ever before it came out that Americans were torturing people. What a big cesspool of mess.
Yeah, but then think about how many opportunities to go to war we'd pass up! I don't think the defense contractors would get behind that one Jamesrage. And they've a pretty large lobby.
So how did Bush cause the French to file Resolutions in the UN for Enforceable Action in Syria again.....then lessening Sanctions on Iran. Then file resolutions with over 6 different African Nations. Including Libya wherein they tricked BO and his team into jumping to take out Gadhafi for them and the Sauds?
Where did you say Bush comes in with telling the French what to do?
huh? :roll:
Because it was the actions of that administration that has caused a lot of the problems we see today. They were warned but didn't listen. So **** yeah, I certainly have the right to point the finger.
And, hypothetically, say about 20 Americans succeeded in hijacking a plane (or two) and flying them into a couple of those incredible buildings in Dubai. Does that make the United States of American open for justified invasion? Of course not, so your point is ridiculous.
So, the inevitable escalation has occurred. The local forces have entrenched in an effort to defend themselves, now who could have foreseen that?
Now, I guess with air strikes challenged they will have to put hardware on the ground to take it out. It is what any Peace Prize recipient would do, right?
Can anyone tell me, other than the fact ISIS is not the group of US choice for a puppet government, why the US absolutely MUST fight them? If they're trying to stop people from killing each other, they should start on the nation's streets. When you have a country where men and women can live together in peace and harmony, maybe the rest of the world will look up to that.
I certainly wish the U.S. response to violent groups like this wasn't so hypocritical, but alas, U.S. foreign policy operates not on morality but on potential benefit gained in serving whatever the agenda may be at a given time. We just like to play on the moral issue so that it seams really simple to the common folk.
To answer your somewhat humorous question with a somewhat humorous answer, I think the U.S. feels a little sting since right as most of the troops leave, the place goes to ****. That, at least, is a possible contributing factor.
US foreign policy is more and more shaped by whatever may be gained at THAT time domestically. The older I get and the more wars I see, they all and up without meaning or reason, from Vietnam to Afghanistan.
The place goes to **** because they up and left when they got bored, not because they had brought any stability to the region. Outside olf that great assault on Grenada when has a US invasion ever brought stability...?
Muslims are not evil. And yes, there was already hatred, but now, there's just a lot more.
Preaching to the choir here, my good sir.
You have this incessant need to BE partisan in everything you do.Oh don't pretend that seeing Obama shamed would jerk a tear from your eye. Otherwise your question to me makes no sense. I never offered up that IS would give a **** her or her parents. Only that her parents would have a different take on whether any ransom should be paid. But they have been in the past and will be in the future as Pete pointed out. It's just not advertised.
So how did Bush cause the French to file Resolutions in the UN for Enforceable Action in Syria again.....then lessening Sanctions on Iran. Then file resolutions with over 6 different African Nations. Including Libya wherein they tricked BO and his team into jumping to take out Gadhafi for them and the Sauds?
Where did you say Bush comes in with telling the French what to do?
They've gotten so used to saying everything is Bush's fault, even after years of Obama, that they just can't help themselves? What I do remember is Obama arguing with the G8 in 2009/2010 that they should be spending more money - not less. I remember the other countries politely disagreeing but saying they would do as they saw fit, and he should do the same. So trillions have now been added to our debt, bringing it to over $17 trillion. What did all that spending gain us - there are now nearly 48 million people on food stamps, and heaven knows how many on other government assistance programs; a lack of well-paying jobs; an unemployment number that is still higher than any Bush ever had; crumbling infrastructure; and a public that is angry. No other country in history has owed so much money to so many people as we currently do. So who was correct - Obama or the other G8 countries that decided that a little cutting back on spending was necessary, and followed through?
Many elected officials both on the right and left seem to have their lips firmly wrapped around M.I.C.'s(military industrial complex) ****. Kind of males me wonder if this militarization of the police is just another way of lining the pockets of MIC. Yeah the police are getting used equipment.But when another war pops up the military will need new equipment because it sold or given away all their old equipment.
Fine. Then they can pay the ransom.
I hate to sound cold, but....maybe they should've insisted their daughter not go over there in the first place because **** like this has happened in the past.
These sick freaks don't care if all you're doing is handing out meals and blankets. If they think they can get money off of threatening your life, they'll take ya. Some people are just too damn stupid to realize that wearing a "Red Cross" or "Press" badge DOES NOT protect you anymore. Not with these psychopaths!
I think there is way more to it than that.....which the US not being there. Doesn't mean any of that violence and or sectarian divide would all go away. Then there is the issue with Israel and Other Allies. It would be even more violent. Also Russia has been there for the last 20 years too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?