France was invaded in advance as an independent country.Ukraine being absorbed back into Russia makes as much sense as France being absorbed back into Germany. You know the Germans ruled France as recently as the 1940's.
Fake country as it does not have lineage, comes off as rather elitist.This might seem like a weird question, but Ukrainian self-determination has dubious historical foundations. If you look into it, you'll find that Ukraine was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth before getting partitioned into Imperial Russia before Napoleonic Europe. In contrast, Napoleon himself was the cause for why the Republic of Venice lost its over 1,000 year independence to Austria which received the rest of Ukraine as well. The partition happened in 1793 whereas Venice fell in 1797.
Therefore, is there really any argument for why Ukraine shouldn't be treated as a fake nation and the entire country should be reabsorbed by Russia?
Countries are elite. In the hierarchy of jurisdictions, we have boroughs, cities, counties, provinces, and nation-states.Fake country as it does not have lineage, comes off as rather elitist.
Ukraine is smaller than Alaska which used to be Russian too.Yes, Ukraine is a real country.
Ukraine - Wikipedia
Ukraine is a large country in Eastern Europe, lying mostly in the East European Plain. It is the second-largest European country, after Russia. It covers an area of 603,628 square kilometres (233,062 sq mi) and with a coastline of 2,782 kilometres (1,729 mi). It lies between latitudes 44° and 53° N, and
...
See more
Is that you Tucker?This might seem like a weird question, but Ukrainian self-determination has dubious historical foundations. If you look into it, you'll find that Ukraine was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth before getting partitioned into Imperial Russia before Napoleonic Europe. In contrast, Napoleon himself was the cause for why the Republic of Venice lost its over 1,000 year independence to Austria which received the rest of Ukraine as well. The partition happened in 1793 whereas Venice fell in 1797.
Therefore, is there really any argument for why Ukraine shouldn't be treated as a fake nation and the entire country should be reabsorbed by Russia?
I'm just shocked right now.Is that you Tucker?
We should take halfI'm just shocked right now.
I was looking up the history of Ukraine to find some justification for its sovereign existence, but there doesn't seem to be one.
I'm guessing you meant Empire, not Commonwealth. America was never part of the Commonwealth.This might seem like a weird question, but colonial United States self-determination has dubious historical foundations. If you look into it, you'll find that the United States was part of the British Commonwealth.
Therefore, is there really any argument for why the United States shouldn't be treated as a fake nation and the entire country should be reabsorbed by the UK?
So? The United States had way less cause for independence than Ukraine does. If you don't think Ukraine qualifies as a country you should also be asking that not just of the United States, but about half of the other countries on Earth as well.I'm guessing you meant Empire, not Commonwealth. America was never part of the Commonwealth.
Ukraine wasn't conquered as a colony. It was awarded from intervening in a domestic conflict in Poland because of how the Cossacks had previously pledged allegiance to Russia from a previous war almost 150 years prior.
This might seem like a weird question, but Ukrainian self-determination has dubious historical foundations. If you look into it, you'll find that Ukraine was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth before getting partitioned into Imperial Russia before Napoleonic Europe. In contrast, Napoleon himself was the cause for why the Republic of Venice lost its over 1,000 year independence to Austria which received the rest of Ukraine as well. The partition happened in 1793 whereas Venice fell in 1797.
Therefore, is there really any argument for why Ukraine shouldn't be treated as a fake nation and the entire country should be reabsorbed by Russia?
I'm just shocked right now.
I was looking up the history of Ukraine to find some justification for its sovereign existence, but there doesn't seem to be one.
Ukraine asked for protection by the Russians. It was a willing vassal. It wasn't like the Americans who revolted over taxation without representation. If anything, the Cossack thieves of today are opposed to the taxation policy of the Ukrainian government's social welfare programs seeking to align with fellow social democrats in the EU.So? The United States had way less cause for independence than Ukraine does. If you don't think Ukraine qualifies as a country you should also be asking that not just of the United States, but about half of the other countries on Earth as well.
Ukraine never revolted as a colony under taxation pressure like the U.S. It was communists who declared independence from the Soviet Union when the coup happened in 1991.Should America be reabsorbed back into the UK? That only changed between 1776 and 1791, and so it's 2 years more fake than the Ukraine.
I don't like the argument I'm making here. If anything, it has me concerned.I don't remember that the Ukraine has to justify a goddamn thing to you.
Mmm... Ukraine declared independence after the coup failed. The coup was against the New Union Treaty which Ukraine initially supported but lost confidence in after the communist party lost power in the USSR.Ukraine was given it's independence when the USSR broke up. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine became an independent state, formalised with a referendum in December 1991.
The Russians agreed to this with the stipulation that Ukraine give up its nuclear weapons, they were in possession of 400.
Ukraine never revolted as a colony under taxation pressure like the U.S. It was communists who declared independence from the Soviet Union when the coup happened in 1991.
That was a few years after Russia separated from the Mongol empire.This might seem like a weird question, but Ukrainian self-determination has dubious historical foundations. If you look into it, you'll find that Ukraine was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth before getting partitioned into Imperial Russia before Napoleonic Europe. In contrast, Napoleon himself was the cause for why the Republic of Venice lost its over 1,000 year independence to Austria which received the rest of Ukraine as well. The partition happened in 1793 whereas Venice fell in 1797.
Therefore, is there really any argument for why Ukraine shouldn't be treated as a fake nation and the entire country should be reabsorbed by Russia?
It determines if there's a justification for independence to make history or if independence is just rebelling without a cause to make anarchy.What possible difference would that make?
300 years passed since Russia rebelled against the Mongols over not wanting to pay tribute any longer. The Mongols coincidentally were allied to Poland and the Rus were allied to Crimea.That was a few years after Russia separated from the Mongol empire.
You answered your own question.300 years passed since Russia rebelled against the Mongols over not wanting to pay tribute any longer. The Mongols coincidentally were allied to Poland and the Rus were allied to Crimea.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?