Why would anyone be concerned about a psychotic theocracy bent on the destruction of civilization having or pursuing a nuclear weapon? I always use uranium enriched to 60% in my reactor, and let me tell ya, I always have hot water.
You should know that W was proven right, so why the pretense?Is trump about to lie us into another war like W did with his weapons of mass destruction claims?
Saddam, not Bush.Thankfully W took care of the weapons of mass destruction before Iraq had a chance to use them
Correctly.and, what, there were no weapons of mass destruction, but W and his cronies said there were?
There is good reason to believe he's correct in this as well.And now we have Donald talking about war with Iran because they are so close to having a nuclear weapon, that's what he's saying.
How were they wrong about the 2016 election?And then we have the intelligence services, which trump knows more than anyone in any of the services about everything, saying Iran isn't even close to having a bomb. Since Donald says he operates on instinct and he says they are close, who do you believe? Trump or his intelligence operatives who were also wrong about putin and the 2016 election?
Let us know when you figure out what they are saying.Who do you believe, trump or the intelligence services? Trump says Iran is close to having a nuclear weapon but U.S. intelligence says otherwise
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-iran-close-having-203212307.html
Colin Powell never agreed with this assessment which is why he wanted the people who supported this invasion right behind him when he sold his soul at the UN backing Bush's claims. He wanted the people in the picture as he made his false claims that they backed.I believe that Bush was convinced by his advisers that there were WMD..Trump knows Iran doesn’t have a nuclear weapon
Try this.You should know that W was proven right, so why the pretense?
Saddam, not Bush.
Get the facts correct.
Correctly.
There is good reason to believe he's correct in this as well.
How were they wrong about the 2016 election?
Let us know when you figure out what they are saying.
Until now, you have compared apples to appliances.
Should we just dictate to other countries what they can and can't do? We aren't complaining about Israel having nukes and netan Yahoo is a flat out war criminal.Why would anyone be concerned about a psychotic theocracy bent on the destruction of civilization having or pursuing a nuclear weapon? I always use uranium enriched to 60% in my reactor, and let me tell ya, I always have hot water.
It's much better, but don't forget that this was discovered years later.Try this.
No, Iraq under Saddam Hussein did not possess usable stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction at the time of the 2003 US-led invasion. While Iraq had previously pursued chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs, and had used chemical weapons, notably in the Halabja attack, these programs were dismantled under UN supervision following the 1991 Gulf War.
Yes, he is trying to lie his way into another war, of course. Netanyahu and Putin are traitor trump's brains. He is their puppet, as always. Useful idiot.And then we have the intelligence services, which trump knows more than anyone in any of the services about everything, saying Iran isn't even close to having a bomb. Since Donald says he operates on instinct and he says they are close, who do you believe? Trump or his intelligence operatives who were also wrong about putin and the 2016 election?
Who do you believe, trump or the intelligence services?
Exactly! Netanyahu is an unhinged blood thirsty hateful extremist murderous war criminal, but it's okay if he has a nuke, WTF?Should we just dictate to other countries what they can and can't do? We aren't complaining about Israel having nukes and netan Yahoo is a flat out war criminal.
It's much better, but don't forget that this was discovered years later.
It also shreds your attempted point into confetti.
Worry about your own murderous psychopaths who have a lot more nukes than Iran... ugh...
The same scumbag$ who have lied/obfuscated us into numerous murderous injustices have suckered the goddamned fools again...It doesn't take much to fool them.. Just drag out the old 'weapons of mass distraction'boob bait...
Netanyahu is not a psychopath. Khamenei is.Should we just dictate to other countries what they can and can't do? We aren't complaining about Israel having nukes and netan Yahoo is a flat out war criminal.
Thankfully W took care of the weapons of mass destruction before Iraq had a chance to use them and, what, there were no weapons of mass destruction, but W and his cronies said there were?
And now we have Donald talking about war with Iran because they are so close to having a nuclear weapon, that's what he's saying.
And then we have the intelligence services, which trump knows more than anyone in any of the services about everything, saying Iran isn't even close to having a bomb. Since Donald says he operates on instinct and he says they are close, who do you believe? Trump or his intelligence operatives who were also wrong about putin and the 2016 election?
Who do you believe, trump or the intelligence services?
Trump says Iran is close to having a nuclear weapon but U.S. intelligence says otherwise
Trump says Iran is close to having a nuclear weapon but U.S. intelligence says otherwise
NBC News White House Correspondent Vaughn Hillyard, Senior National Security Correspondent Courtney Kube and retired Lt. Gen. Steph Twitty join Meet the Press NOW to discuss the Intelligence Community’s assessment that Iran isn’t close to creating a nuclear weapon, despite President Trump saying...www.yahoo.com
Bush was proven right? About what?You should know that W was proven right, so why the pretense?
Saddam, not Bush.
Get the facts correct.
Correctly.
There is good reason to believe he's correct in this as well.
How were they wrong about the 2016 election?
Let us know when you figure out what they are saying.
Until now, you have compared apples to appliances.
I have no murderous psychopaths.
It’s not my fault you lack the judgement to objectively evaluate this situation.
Bush was proven right? About what?
I can’t say I expected better.
Evidence of the chemical weapons was eventually found, but it was years later.Bush was proven right? About what?
Didn't exist yet.Somethingsomething they heard on NewZmax..
Why would anyone not a goddamned fool believe Republicrat-levelpropaganda?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?