Menard_K
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2,476
- Reaction score
- 233
- Location
- L5
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?
any author is fallible.... so be it, HOWEVER, in comparison with known standards like the laws of physics.
I do have a problem with people who speculate and believe they have it all figured out, such as the
mini-nukes faction or the weaponized laser "death ray" faction, the one thing that I can say with certainty is that the "collapse" of WTC 1, 2 & 7 had additional sources of energy to power the "collapse" + logic & reason tell me that there were NO airliners used as weapons that day - in part the logic is thus, the events of 9/11/2001 had to have been planned, and at this point its not relevant if the planning was going on in a cave in the middle east or in some posh office, the planners of these sorts of things do NOT gamble they invest in sure-thing operations. Given that there is NO precedent for an aircraft to have breached a wall and penetrated completely ( thus insuring the total destruction of damning evidence ) WHY should the planners gamble on a bit where the airliners could have bounced off the towers, note that a .45 bullet will bounce off of a plate-glass window if the angle is right,
too many variables, how do you guarantee success in this sort of thing, fake the planes and lie to the public.
One thing that the "truth movement" gets accused of all too often is "argument from incredulity" HOWEVER, the supporters of the 19 suicidal fanatics story will say "OH but HOW could it possibly have been done" that is faking airliner crashes into the WTC & Pentagon. PLEASE, back to forensics 101, once we know that a crime has been committed, the first thing to do is compile evidence, NOT speculate as to who did it & why, get the evidence together and it will tell the story.
part of the problem here is that the rubble pile from WTC 1, 2, & 7 had been removed in haste, and how much if any forensic examination of the rubble pile was done before Mayor Giuliani ordered the trucks to roll all night to remove material from ground zero and deposit it in a land fill. This whole bit reeks of a cover-up, what did Giuliani NOT want seen?
any author is fallible.... so be it, HOWEVER, in comparison with known standards like the laws of physics.
I do have a problem with people who speculate and believe they have it all figured out, such as the
mini-nukes faction or the weaponized laser "death ray" faction, the one thing that I can say with certainty is that the "collapse" of WTC 1, 2 & 7 had additional sources of energy to power the "collapse" + logic & reason tell me that there were NO airliners used as weapons that day - in part the logic is thus, the events of 9/11/2001 had to have been planned, and at this point its not relevant if the planning was going on in a cave in the middle east or in some posh office, the planners of these sorts of things do NOT gamble they invest in sure-thing operations. Given that there is NO precedent for an aircraft to have breached a wall and penetrated completely ( thus insuring the total destruction of damning evidence ) WHY should the planners gamble on a bit where the airliners could have bounced off the towers, note that a .45 bullet will bounce off of a plate-glass window if the angle is right,
too many variables, how do you guarantee success in this sort of thing, fake the planes and lie to the public.
One thing that the "truth movement" gets accused of all too often is "argument from incredulity" HOWEVER, the supporters of the 19 suicidal fanatics story will say "OH but HOW could it possibly have been done" that is faking airliner crashes into the WTC & Pentagon. PLEASE, back to forensics 101, once we know that a crime has been committed, the first thing to do is compile evidence, NOT speculate as to who did it & why, get the evidence together and it will tell the story.
part of the problem here is that the rubble pile from WTC 1, 2, & 7 had been removed in haste, and how much if any forensic examination of the rubble pile was done before Mayor Giuliani ordered the trucks to roll all night to remove material from ground zero and deposit it in a land fill. This whole bit reeks of a cover-up, what did Giuliani NOT want seen?