- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 72,131
- Reaction score
- 58,867
- Location
- NE Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
:naughty
No. You are using flawed logic.
Man, that there devil sure has got a tongue on him! :lamo
The Jesus of life doesn't have to match the future cultural references and observances. He's a tool.
You are speaking nonsense.
He Jesus should be represented as he was, whether he is a creation ort not, just as Santa should be represented as created.
You are correct as I am using your logic. The difference is I used recognized your logic as flawed and used it purposefully.
You are speaking nonsense.
He Jesus should be represented as he was, whether he is a creation ort not, just as Santa should be represented as created.
There is nothing special about the race of a fictional character it is a detail, just as are clothes, personality traits, or pretty much anything else. The desire to compare specific details is simply elevating on detail over another.
Wrong.
A difference in clothing has nothing to do with skin color.
That is failed logic on your behalf.
Micky was a black mouse, as Santa was a white human.
No, clothes of a character can be changed as they are nothing but clothes, but things about the character physical appearance should not be altered. To compare clothes to things like race, sex, hair and eye color is ridiculous.
Wrong.As a fictional character, Santa is being created every time someone imagines him.
Krampus is an asshole
And you were wrong.I already explained why it is relevant. So far your response is "wrong" which insufficient for a debate forum.
Wrong.
You are obviously confused as Santa is something that has already been created and established.
As created, Santa is a white human male.
So we should abandon lily white Santa Claus with his red coat, reindeer, sleigh, and so forth and return to his original depiction?
And you were wrong.
Oy vey. And he is still a black mouse isn't he. That hasn't changed has it?As was Mickey in the 30s
Looks like you are getting enough notes to fill up a book!
Oy vey. And he is still a black mouse isn't he. That hasn't changed has it?
Of course not.
As Henrin pointed out, those characteristics haven't changed, nor should they.
The same hold for Santa. He is a white male.
Get over it.
Another asinine pathetic deflection.
Still a white guy.
You are conflating two distinctly different issues.Completely relevant. Your argument is that because the initial concept of Santa is white then Santa must be white. In other words the original set of details of a fictional concept sets the benchmark for it.
The initial concept of Mickey Mouse is without gloves. Does Mickey Mouse wear gloves?
:lamoYou're still embracing an "objectively incorrect" depiction of Santa. You sinner, you.
You are conflating two distinctly different issues.
The characteristics of the character. White human male vs black male mouse.
And the clothes they may wear.
It is irrelevant to each other, an asinine comparison and illogical.
Micky donning gloves matters not to his portrayed skin color, sex or species.
He is still a black male mouse, just as Santa is a white male human.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?