Would depend on the circumstancesI don't normally listen to Steven Crowder, but I am at the moment & he brought up something about a woman without a uterus. What he was saying has me wondering, is it politically correct to point out that a woman born without a uterus (human with Y chromosome) doesn't have a uterus?
I don't normally listen to Steven Crowder,
What, like, in ordinary conversation? That would seem highly rude.I don't normally listen to Steven Crowder, but I am at the moment & he brought up something about a woman without a uterus. What he was saying has me wondering, is it politically correct to point out that a woman born without a uterus (human with Y chromosome) doesn't have a uterus?
Males don't have uteruses.... uterusi .... err.. uterusesses....I don't normally listen to Steven Crowder, but I am at the moment & he brought up something about a woman without a uterus. What he was saying has me wondering, is it politically correct to point out that a woman born without a uterus (human with Y chromosome) doesn't have a uterus?
I guess if it was just out of the blue, but if biology or anatomy came up in conversation, one would think saying that a person without a uterus doesn't have a uterus isn't the least bit rude. Women don't have prostates, either, so, not sure how that's rude or politically incorrect, lolWhat, like, in ordinary conversation? That would seem highly rude.
Males don't have uteruses.... uterusi .... err.. uterusesses....
Ah, the madness of our times...
This is the thing with these man vs. woman wedge issues. They are completely academic and theoretical. Never in my life have I ever asked anyone to identify whether they are a man or a woman. It's not relevant to anything in ordinary conversation and is rude.I guess if it was just out of the blue, but if biology or anatomy came up in conversation, one would think saying that a person without a uterus doesn't have a uterus isn't the least bit rude. Women don't have prostates, either, so, not sure how that's rude or politically incorrect, lol
Never in my life has that question been necessary.This is the thing with these man vs. woman wedge issues. They are completely academic and theoretical. Never in my life have I ever asked anyone to identify whether they are a man or a woman. It's not relevant to anything in ordinary conversation and is rude.
lol even if not true that was funnyThis is the kind of person with a paid subscription to Crowder.
Homo sapiens is a species of primate, which reproduces via sexual reproduction when the male of the species fertilizes the eggs of the female internally, through sexual intercourse.You dare to bring up scientific truth?
I work in the healthcare industry, and we are required to take a training course about gender identity; I didn't see anything I disagreed with. All it's saying is that we should basically be respectful and mindful of how the community we serve wants to be addressed.This is the thing with these man vs. woman wedge issues. They are completely academic and theoretical. Never in my life have I ever asked anyone to identify whether they are a man or a woman. It's not relevant to anything in ordinary conversation and is rude.
I don't normally listen to Steven Crowder, but I am at the moment & he brought up something about a woman without a uterus. What he was saying has me wondering, is it politically correct to point out that a woman born without a uterus (human with Y chromosome) doesn't have a uterus?
Homo sapiens are a species of primate, which reproduces via sexual reproduction when the male of the species fertilizes the eggs of the female internally, through sexual intercourse.
I'll report for reeducation now, I guess....View attachment 67388721
You dare to bring up scientific truth?
Well, if a person wants to have a baby, then it depends on whether they're male or female & history has shown us that one of each is required: if a person is one of them, they need to pair up with one of the other. I am a man (a male) and I need a woman (a female) to make babies, so I need to know whether or not someone has a uterus for that. </neil spiel>Why consider that person a woman in the first place?
LOL It's biology, which isn't a social science. I actually do consider the social sciences to be totally as much a part of the sciences as any of the other sciences. Where I have an issue is with Orwellian BS that results in males competing as females with other females, males using locker rooms for females, males claiming to be women raping females, etc.It's social science. A very unscientific kind of science.
It's social science. A very unscientific kind of science.
LOL It's biology, which isn't a social science.
I actually do consider the social sciences to be totally as much a part of the sciences as any of the other sciences. Where I have an issue is with Orwellian BS that results in males competing as females with other females, males using locker rooms for females, males claiming to be women raping females, etc.
Well, if a person wants to have a baby, then it depends on whether they're male or female & history has shown us that one of each is required: if a person is one of them, they need to pair up with one of the other. I am a man (a male) and I need a woman (a female) to make babies, so I need to know whether or not someone has a uterus for that. </neil spiel>
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?