EpicDude86
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 4,384
- Reaction score
- 822
- Location
- Epic Mountain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You are just twisted. :lol:
I disagree. They are repressed bisexuals who are merely acting upon their latent desires.
Situational bisexuality is not reminiscent of repressed desire.
They have no other sexual outlet aside from other men. Practically all of those men in prison would jump at the chance to be with a woman if given the choice, even if the male option were more attractive.
If any heterosexual person was put in a situation where the opposite sex was not present, over the long term they would consider sexual pursuits with those in their surroundings.
It's similar to why a lot of gay men in the past couple of generations ended up having wives and families. The social norms were so strong and opportunities for fulfilling same-sex relationships so few, that they forced themselves to pursue heterosexual relations. It's situational bisexuality.
And you would be wrong about that.
Humans are sexual. There are no lines in the sand.
Please demonstrate some evidence of your position.
We've had this discussion before. I maintain that there is no substantive difference between sexual orientation and preference, the former being a construct of the mind. Humans are, quite plainly, sexual.
No no, the Captain asked you to show some evidence of this position. And since this is the first i've heard of it, too, i'd LOVE to read a scientific journal or a psychiatric study that shows what you are saying to be true.
I'm not ragging on you, i'm just curious because i'd love to read such a paper to understand where you're coming from. I'm assuming you didn't just make it up, right?
Please demonstrate some evidence of your position.
I don't have an answer you'd find acceptable.
Try me. I can accept a lot of things, provided there is scientific of psychiatric evidence to back it up.
We've had this discussion before. I maintain that there is no substantive difference between sexual orientation and preference, the former being a construct of the mind. Humans are, quite plainly, sexual.
Yes, we have had this discussion, before. And I still disagree with you...
I still say that the difference between sexual orientation and preference is semantics...
...and I still say that there is no evidence that the folks we are discussing are repressed bisexuals.
I'm not sure if you are arguing from a "sexuality along a continuum" position, ala Kinsey, or not. If you are, your position does not fit that theory. If you aren't, I've been asking you to clarify.
Well this post is made by someone who doesnt understand genetics at.Secondly i would like to think people love their children and dont just see them as a means to pass their genes.
Children aren't just a gene pass on method, but also legalized slave labor for 8-10 years.
The only reason I would vote yes is because parents who would even think about getting rid of a child because he/she is gay would be such idiots that they don't deserve to be parents and the child would be better off not being born at all than to be born and raised by such morons.
Is it a sin to be an idiot?Punish the child for the sins of the parents?
Willful ignorance certainly is a choice. As for lack of intellect, I do not think so.Is idiocy a choice?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?