- Joined
- Feb 28, 2007
- Messages
- 2,299
- Reaction score
- 413
- Location
- Northern Arkansas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
History is also replete with examples of thriving multicultural societies. Consider the Pax Romana or the Mongolian Empire. All it it takes is a little tolerance on the part of the majority.
Come to think of it, the Han the you are holding up as such a shining example of unity are, in fact, the descendants of a successful multicultural society.
......and it eventually led to their demise. That's what many of us are seeing happening now.
In point of fact, I find that assertion highly debatable. (which is why we're debating this now.)
With respect to multicuturalism vs. unity/assimilation,
-James Madison, Federalist #10
The Pax Romana was the height of Roman imperial strength and expansion. What led to it's demise was the convergence of a number of historical, economic, and political factors. However I think there is a case to be made for the Mongols that multiculturalism ultimately failed them.
You realize, of course, the original 13 colonies weren't multicultural in any sense. They were busy forging a single culture of largely western european origins. That would be the same traditional culture I happen to belong to now.
You can't overlook the fact that it's armies and large sections of it's empire were eventually peopled by germans, who eventually decided they owed no allegiance or taxes to rome.
What's happening in America bears little resemblance to Balkanization. America is not divided along geographical lines, at least not the splits we see here. I'm talking about neighborhoods, communities. Not that the South and Northeast and Pacific West are completely distinct from each other racially and politically and demographically.
Perhaps. Yet the Empire did a relatively decent job of incorporating newly conquered territories into its empire and offering citizenship to those that wanted it. I don't see multiculturalism vs. assimilation as an either/or thing. At any point in time, both could be happening at the same time. Ethnic minorities and newly conquered peoples wish to hold on to their own traditional identities, yet also assimilate in order to play a part of something bigger and rise up in the larger order.
As a decendent of (largely) german immigrants who gave up the spelling of their name, their language, and much of their culture, I tend to see this as an either or situation. But there is more at work here than just how immigrants assimilate, or not.
You and I are as culturally divided as we are from our recent latino immigrants. I'm a member of a traditional culture of western european origins. You are not. I resent and reject many of your cultural norms. I feel your culture is busy trying to dominate mine. I feel your culture is materialistic, death orientated, hollow, and decadent. I want no part of it. I feel it's injurious to mine. Hell I feel your culture is corrosive to all traditonal cultures latino as well as mine.
Well I agree there are geographic differences. But it's still extremely difficult to think that the coasts will split off and become their own states. Keep in mind Yugoslavia was built along separate ethnic lines to begin with, and it was only a Communist dictator and shared hatred of the Nazis that brought them together in the first place. Balkanization is not even remotely a likelihood in the United States, I don't see a Civil War scenario happening in the near future.
There are 56 ethnic groups in China. Europe has 87 distinct ethnic groups. The Tlingit indian tribe of Alaska shares ethnic ancestory with the Koreans. Both of them are decendants of a distinct ethnic group the Mongol people. China is not an ethnicity. The Han people of China are an ethnic group.
Not to sound offensive or anything given that our discussion has been civil up to this point, but you don't know me personally and know nothing of my "culture." In fact I am a first-generation American, son of Taiwanese parents of Han Chinese descent.
Cultural norms are collective, not individual. If you are referring to my liberalism, well here we can just agree to disagree. In any case liberalism is a political ideology not a culture.I resent and reject many of your cultural norms.
Nobody in America is preventing you from going to church and believing and following your traditional American conservatives values.I feel your culture is busy trying to dominate mine.
If anything is materialistic, it's laissez-faire capitalism. Death-oriented? How is liberalism death-oriented? FYI I am against abortion in most cases except rape, perhaps incest. I guess "hollow" is a subjective term. Decadence is a matter of perception and personal opinion. Either way nobody is attempting to force their points of view on you. As an aside I am actually quite conservative in my personal life. I am a 20-year-old college student, a virgin and have never touched alcohol in my life (not religious reasons).I feel your culture is materialistic, death orientated, hollow, and decadent.
Like I said, we live in America. You are free to believe what you wish and stick to your own personal values.I want no part of it. I feel it's injurious to mine.
In short, my people are better off without you.
......and there is no reason it shouldn't remain civil. However, I thought you were a white liberal. Of course, if you share their values I feel the same way about you I would about white liberals. Isn't that fair?
As an aside, a good friend of my wife is married to an american of ethnic taiwanese decent. They don't seem to like you guys very much. Ironic isn't it. :mrgreen:
English is our common language and the lingua franca of pretty much the entire civilized world. We don't have a common culture, but I don't see that necessarily as a bad thing. But I do believe all people who identify as Americans have many beliefs in common.I see the US as devoid of a common language, culture, and recognizable borders.
I agree we are not a nation. I also believe that present-day Chinese society is not one that should even be emulated. Han Chinese make up 99% of the population and the government uses Han Chinese forcing them into regions where they want to extend their influence (think Uighurs in Xinjiang, and Tibetans in Tibet). All of the policies that they say are in favor of protecting their ethnic minorities is a superficial facade.We are less a nation in the traditional sense, unlike the present day chinese, and simply just a large tax domain.
I believe the us will disintegrate. It's inevitable. Other nations have been talking about it for quite some time. I don't see it in my lifetime, too short, and "maybe" not in my son's lifetime, but it will occur.
Despite being the son of immigrants, I consider myself to be an American first and foremost, as opposed to having a core Asian-American identity. I love American sports. I listen to American popular music. I engage in the same kinds activities that people my age all over the nation engage in. Despite this, my parents raised me according to traditional Asian-style Confucian values, such as unquestioning respect for your elders, hard work, being responsible for yourself and to your family, and basically getting through your own trials and tribulations without whining or complaining.
Cultural norms are collective, not individual. If you are referring to my liberalism, well here we can just agree to disagree. In any case liberalism is a political ideology not a culture.
Nobody in America is preventing you from going to church and believing and following your traditional American conservatives values.
If anything is materialistic, it's laissez-faire capitalism. Death-oriented? How is liberalism death-oriented? FYI I am against abortion in most cases except rape, perhaps incest. I guess "hollow" is a subjective term. Decadence is a matter of perception and personal opinion. Either way nobody is attempting to force their points of view on you.
Like I said, we live in America. You are free to believe what you wish and stick to your own personal values.
You don't know me.
Asian-Americans Lean Left Politically
I'm curious Dutch, how exactly would you describe what Liberal values are? As opposed to conservative values? And what makes yours superior to mine?
..........Take a randomly selected sample of 100 liberal adults and 100 conservative adults. According to an analysis of the 2004 General Social Survey -- a bible of data for social scientists -- the liberals would have had 147 kids, while the conservatives would have had 208. That's a fertility gap of 41 percent. Even adjusting for other variables like age and income, there is a gap of 19 percent.
Now superimpose this on a map of the United States. The highest fertility rate is found in the most Republican state, Utah, home to the Mormon Church. The lowest fertility belongs to Vermont, a state liberal enough to be the first to sanction gay unions.
The states with the next highest fertility rates, according to the latest National Center for Health Statistics survey, are Arizona, Alaska and Texas, otherwise known as "red states." States with the next lowest fertility rates are Maine, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, all "blue states."
So what does it mean that the birth rate in Salt Lake City far outstrips that of liberal San Francisco (where dogs supposedly outnumber children)?
"Liberals have got a big 'baby problem,' and it risks being the death of them," contends Arthur Brooks, professor at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Public Affairs. He reckons that unless something gives, Democratic politicians in the future may not have many babies to kiss.
"When secular-minded Americans decide to have few, or no, children, they unwittingly give a strong evolutionary advantage to the other side of the culture divide," writes Phillip Longman, senior fellow at the New America Foundation. "If 'Metros' don't start having more children, America's future is 'Retro.' "
But wait, you may say: the attitudes of the parents don't determine what ideology or political party their offspring will adopt as their own. Yet they usually do.
English is our common language and the lingua franca of pretty much the entire civilized world. We don't have a common culture, but I don't see that necessarily as a bad thing. But I do believe all people who identify as Americans have many beliefs in common.
I agree we are not a nation. I also believe that present-day Chinese society is not one that should even be emulated. Han Chinese make up 99% of the population and the government uses Han Chinese forcing them into regions where they want to extend their influence (think Uighurs in Xinjiang, and Tibetans in Tibet). All of the policies that they say are in favor of protecting their ethnic minorities is a superficial facade.
Perhaps the US will disintegrate just all other great powers and empires have disintegrated in the past, due to the confluence of a number of factors. I don't see that as a result of multiculturalism. In any case, I already stressed my view that in a free democratic society it's inevitable that you will have drastically different passions, opinions and ways of thinking. I think that is the essence of what makes American great. Even if our policies are ineffective because we have to compromise, that is the price we pay for living in a free society. Any attempt to create an inordinate degree of unity would be inherently coercive and propagandistic.
Define american. I like many types of music but my heart belongs to bluegrass.
I hunt.
I believe children are assets to a society, not a liability.
I consider myself an athiest but I'm partial to christians. I think of myself as culturally christian.
I believe religion is beneficial in many ways and detrimental in others.I see religion as being largely beneficial to my people.
I see expansive government as necessary given the complex world we live in, and we would be facing much worse problems if government were minimalist. However I do agree that the government is capable of doing more harm than good in many cases. That in no way means that it is unnecessary. At the end of the day the performance of the government is a reflection of the individuals we elect to participate in it. I believe that it is a good thing to hold government accountable for it's actions, but this is pretty much an open-ended proposition.I see this government as being largely harmful to my people.
Repealing dadt, gay marriage, most of us don't support it.
I believe the debate about immigration and border control is superficial BS if we don't talk about the root cause of the problem, which is that Mexico sucks. Nobody seems to be talking about that. Every issue has a demand-side and a supply-side. The demand here is simply that people in Mexico live in such terrible conditions and situations that they see no recourse but to cross the border illegally. We should be talking about how to make Mexico not as ****ty.Those in my part of the country feel we need some control over the border. What's happening is insane.
The first "very conservative" was interesting, well written,informative, which I "like".It is not important who are Chinese, most important is that they will govern the Islamic USA and Europa in fifty years.
I think this is illusory. Nobody is forcing you from going to church or believing the things you believe. Nobody is forcing you (or any other traditional conservative) to get an abortion or a gay marriage. Anyways, the courts decisions can go either way. The court might make decisions that I personally think are anti-liberal and detrimental to the country (for instance Citizens United), but I will accept them because that is how our constitution works and in no way do i view liberalism as being "under attack" because the courts make a conservative decision.And yet my tradition culture is forced to accept your cultural norms vis a vie the courts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?