Really now?? Are you setting in the bar ditch? I support an investigation, and if it uncovers illegal acts, I certainly hope somebody goes to jail, AND..............I hope it will serve as a wake up call to all future presidents, republican and democratic as well, that such behaviour won't be tolerated. Now then, what reasonable and objective person would take issue with that position??
What branch of govt are they again??
yes really.
If you actually were concerned, I see no reason to attempt to mitigate the violation by pointing out how it happens all the time inthe past. That line of reasoning can only lesson the call for stopping it now.
ok, now tell us which of the unavailable emails consists of records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the IRS
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was assistant treasury secretary for the reason administration, and co-founder of Reaganomics, Rense.com is merely quoting him. Roberts has itemised a laundry list of Bush crimes! It was a memo from #10 Downing Street that disclosed the information that Bush (not Clinton) had fixed the intelligence around his Iraq policy, sorry!
Would you expect the radical right group at FOX.com to be forthcoming with the truth??
J. Russell George, who serves as an IRS watchdog at the U.S. Treasury, told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that only last week did his office receive documents showing the term "progressive" was used to flag cases for additional review.
"The moment I became aware that other groups were spotlighted by the IRS, I directed my staff to commence review of that," George said.
"I am very disturbed that these documents were not provided to our auditors at the outset," he said. "They were not provided during our audit, even though similar documents that list 'Tea Party' … were."
Inspector says IRS withheld info on targeting liberals
Which part of "the emails were intentionally destroyed" do you not understand?
Gee, I dunno....which unavailable emails do you think pertain?
then i take it that your post, asserting that such incriminating emails were lost, is without basis, given that you are unable to accept the challenge to show us the evidence of your false assertion
next!
show us your evidence of the intentional destruction of incriminating emailsIntentionally destroyed...not lost. And btw, we are still waiting for proof from the Bush haters that Bush manipulated intelligence on wmds in Iraq to get us into war.
show us your evidence of the intentional destruction of incriminating emails
So just to be clear, your view is that incriminating e-mails were accidentally lost forever and that this wasn't intentional at all. Correct?
Show us your evidence that the missing emails were not incriminating. It is proper to draw negative inference from them, and any jury would be instructed such.show us your evidence of the intentional destruction of incriminating emails
show us your evidence of the intentional destruction of incriminating emails
Show us your evidence that they were not destroyed intentionally.
after you show us how to divide by zero
i will then prove your negative
IRS: So
Excuse me if I don't believe these people. Someone needs to go to jail, and we the people need to know what the hell is going on with the IRS and the White House.
The thing is, from what I understand, it's very difficult to actually destroy data. Lose it, yes; destroy it, no. I'm not tech-savvy, but I do know that data is generally recoverable and also that multiple systems don't "crash" at the same time very often.
after you show us how to divide by zero
i will then prove your negative
how do you know it was a burglar and not your kids' drug addicted friend who was responsible for the theftUsing your logic.....If a burglar robs your home, and leaves no evidence behind other then "your belongings are missing" and he's never caught...then it never actually happened.
how do you know it was a burglar and not your kids' drug addicted friend who was responsible for the theft
act on facts instead of speculation
Using your logic.....If a burglar robs your home, and leaves no evidence behind other then "your belongings are missing" and he's never caught...then it never actually happened.
Using your logic.....If a burglar robs your home, and leaves no evidence behind other then "your belongings are missing" and he's never caught...then it never actually happened.
how do you know it was a burglar and not your kids' drug addicted friend who was responsible for the theft
act on facts instead of speculation
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?