- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
could you possibly back this up with facts:
Black men only marry white women for status symbols or upward mobility and usually the black husbands or boyfriends end up killing the white spouses when the relationships go bad.
or anything else in your post? thanks.
Who are you directing this post to, is that a quote and if so who said it?
Who are you directing this post to, is that a quote and if so who said it?
it was directed to "david duke", and it's his quote.Who are you directing this post to, is that a quote and if so who said it?
My guess would be towards the David Duke troll.
Unless they have a documented disability or smiler, yes.
No doubt you'll be relating this to the topic title soon.Jerry, i am very disappointed in you..... Are you even aware of what unemployment is? :lol:
Jerry, i am very disappointed in you..... Are you even aware of what unemployment is? :lol:
as does coon county. great.I don't think he is trolling at all. I think he believes it and wants to spout it out.
No doubt you'll be relating this to the topic title soon.
If you want to debate the issue please let me know :2wave:
No doubt you'll be relating this to the topic title soon.
Oh the libs are all for diversity in everything, except of course socialism.
Explain to me when you last addressed the topic.Explain to me where the bold relates to the topic?
I made a statement and stand by it. I believe the Justice of the Peace should be left alone and support his decision. He is doing the right thing. He has the right to deny this marriage license. This is America. He has the freedom of speech and expression of his views.
Explain to me when you last addressed the topic.
Don't make ridiculous statements and i will not reply to them:2wave:
Personal responsibility is such a drag
Due to decreased standard of living being primarily driven by unemployment, i do not see how you can state people have a chose to be unemployed (again, you are going to have to revisit the meaning of unemployment).
Now you could logically state poor people who do not seek employment are irresponsible, but that does not constitute unemployment.
For being pro-choice they sure don't support the choice of some to be poor or the choice for others to succeed.
Are they working, paying taxes and supporting their families? Yes or no? Playing word games doesn't change the fact that too many people are riding in the wagon and won't get out and help pull.Due to decreased standard of living being primarily driven by unemployment, i do not see how you can state people have a chose to be unemployed (again, you are going to have to revisit the meaning of unemployment).
Now you could logically state poor people who do not seek employment are irresponsible, but that does not constitute unemployment.
does the justice of the peace have a duty to marry them?
Where does it say that?If he is a state payed employee, yes he does have a duty to marry them. If not, then it is his choice, just like it is the choice of people not to go to him anymore.
Are they working, paying taxes and supporting their families? Yes or no? Playing word games doesn't change the fact that too many people are riding in the wagon and won't get out and help pull.
Now, back to the couple.....does the justice of the peace have a duty to marry them?
Now, back to the couple.....does the justice of the peace have a duty to marry them?
Where does it say that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?