• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Intelligence Chief Gabbard Slammed for Identifying Undercover CIA Officer

Airyaman

Airyaman

New Druid
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
46,421
Reaction score
59,558
Location
AL
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Seems the Russian asset, Tulsi Gabbard, didn't bother to check with other agencies before she decided to list 37 former and current officials that she was revoking clearance from.

One of them is a current undercover CIA officer.

Why were the clearances revoked? Because they dared to do their jobs, which for some was working on possible Russian interference in the 2016 election.

I swear there must be a contest to see who is the most incompetent Trump mushroom sucker.

www.thedailybeast.com

Intelligence Chief Gabbard Slammed for Identifying Undercover CIA Officer

The covert official was included in a list of names shared by Gabbard online.
www.thedailybeast.com www.thedailybeast.com

On Aug. 19, Gabbard posted a memo on X that included a list of 37 current and
former officials who had been stripped of their security clearances, including
those who had supported Trump’s first impeachment trial or concluded that
Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

Also included on the list was a senior CIA officer who had been working
undercover, though Gabbard was unaware of this at the time, The Wall Street
Journal reported. However, sources told the newspaper that Gabbard did not
consult with the intelligence agency before posting the list of names to her
762,000 online followers.

The CIA also had no advance warning that Gabbard planned to publish the list,
which her office had sent it to the agency the night before.
Click to expand...
 
Airyaman said:
Seems the Russian asset, Tulsi Gabbard, didn't bother to check with other agencies before she decided to list 37 former and current officials that she was revoking clearance from.

One of them is a current undercover CIA officer.

Why were the clearances revoked? Because they dared to do their jobs, which for some was working on possible Russian interference in the 2016 election.

I swear there must be a contest to see who is the most incompetent Trump mushroom sucker.

www.thedailybeast.com

Intelligence Chief Gabbard Slammed for Identifying Undercover CIA Officer

The covert official was included in a list of names shared by Gabbard online.
www.thedailybeast.com www.thedailybeast.com
Click to expand...
shrug...

Well, I don't think that officer will be working for the CIA much longer. Not without a clearance.
 
I thought outing a CIA Officer was a major felony. Guess not.
 
SavannahMann said:
I thought outing a CIA Officer was a major felony. Guess not.
Click to expand...
Oh, no. That ship sailed back in the Bush Jr. days when VP Cheney outed a CIA agent in retribution for her husband, a journalist expressed doubts about Bush's claim that Iraq had obtained uranium. No one was ever charged with that crime, one person was convicted of lying to investigators and he was later pardoned by . . . wait for it!

Donald Trump!
 
Mycroft said:
shrug...

Well, I don't think that officer will be working for the CIA much longer. Not without a clearance.
Click to expand...

Because if someone doesn't have a security clearance any longer, it cannot possibly jeopardize ongoing or future operations to reveal to the world that that person was in fact a CIA officer.

Because it couldn't possibly jeopardize anyone he was working with or his contacts.

Because ****tastically idiotic moves like this couldn't possibly dissuade people from putting their lives at risk to serve a government that will not only **** them in a moment's notice if they don't worship Trump, but will also do it at any moment through sheer incompetence.




___________
It's disgusting enough to watch MAGAs suck Trump's ass clean, but then they have to go and do it in the most aggressively stupid way possible.
 
Mr Person said:
Because if someone doesn't have a security clearance any longer, it cannot possibly jeopardize ongoing or future operations to reveal to the world that that person was in fact a CIA officer.

Because it couldn't possibly jeopardize anyone he was working with or his contacts.

Because ****tastically idiotic moves like this couldn't possibly dissuade people from putting their lives at risk to serve a government that will not only **** them in a moment's notice if they don't worship Trump, but will also do it at any moment through sheer incompetence.




___________
It's disgusting enough to watch MAGAs suck Trump's ass clean, but then they have to go and do it in the most aggressively stupid way possible.
Click to expand...


Right?

"Sources and methods" are a real thing.
 
Mycroft said:
shrug...

Well, I don't think that officer will be working for the CIA much longer. Not without a clearance.
Click to expand...
Yes, and his contacts in Russia that take it in the neck won't prevent us from gaining new contacts at all, right?

UNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNG
 
Oh, missed this...where was the CIA officer working undercover?

Russia.

This happens right after the CIA fired a Russia expert with 30 years of experience.

You understand what's happening, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom