- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 66,572
- Reaction score
- 22,195
- Location
- Portlandia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I also hate making these oil sheiks rich while they're ripping us off at the pumps. That really irks me
Or what if carbon credits are suddenly stopped: European fraudsters steal $7B in carbon credit scam - Business - CBC NewsCould you image what would happen if they stopped getting all that research money? Or is they started getting no more research money than the non-alarmists get?
Start here.Nowhere in your link does it state what the exact percentages are that I asked you for. You fail!!
Ah, so after you just post a link (that doesnt tell us anything) you now claim its absurd to asked for exact percentages
Then give us a range of percentages. And post a link that backs it up
No, you are the one acting on faith. I base my opinion on evidence, you are making stark claims and denying evidence. Remember the CO2 chart? Only a fanatic would reject it. Speaking of more faith-based arguments:Actually, its you that believes in this global warming faith. The onus is on you to prove it
You're under the absurd assumption your vague memory of winter temperatures is valid scientific data. Human memory is simply incapable of statistically analyzing fractions of a degree over decades of time purely from memory. It is utterly astounding that anyone thinks they can make such a claim off the top of their head. Here's some data:Tell you what, let me use some common sense. I've lived on and off in Toronto for the past 25 years. Winters have NOT gotten any warmer, in fact they've stayed pretty much exactly the same. So if we've putting out all these CO2's over the last 100 years, shouldnt we also have noticed a drastic warming of our winters??
I am not interested in the claims of a politician regarding a complicated scientific topic.Al Gore and his retarded 'Inconvenient Truth' movie. Nothing that he predicted has come to pass yet
Your dishonesty is noted. I have not done any fearmongering here. You're unable to admit that. My point is proven.This has to be the dumbest question you've posed yet. Its completely irrelevant
No, were not done here
Show everyone where I did that, you liar.When you overstate and exaggerate the amount of global warming thats happening, you are adding to the fear.
Its as simple as that.
I've seen it. They lie to you. Here are three I remember off the top of my head:Its you who's brainwashed. You've bought into the global warming scam.
Watch some of this:
You sound really angry buddy. Try taking a deep breath and count to 10 before you post
Could you image what would happen if they stopped getting all that research money? Or is they started getting no more research money than the non-alarmists get?
Both Lord of Planar and Jack Hays know that CO2 chart is accurate, but they are not going to call you out on it. They wont even mention it.
Deuce, I'm in the process of moving so I don't have access to my full computer (only my cellphone). So I'll get back to your silly post in a week or twoStart here.
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9s9-7.html
No, you are the one acting on faith. I base my opinion on evidence, you are making stark claims and denying evidence. Remember the CO2 chart? Only a fanatic would reject it. Speaking of more faith-based arguments:
You're under the absurd assumption your vague memory of winter temperatures is valid scientific data. Human memory is simply incapable of statistically analyzing fractions of a degree over decades of time purely from memory. It is utterly astounding that anyone thinks they can make such a claim off the top of their head. Here's some data:
https://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/has-canadas-climate-already-changed/11016
Toronto's winters have, in fact, gotten warmer. But your faith said it hasn't, just like your faith said the CO2 chart is wrong.
I am not interested in the claims of a politician regarding a complicated scientific topic.
Your dishonesty is noted. I have not done any fearmongering here. You're unable to admit that. My point is proven.
Show everyone where I did that, you liar.
I've seen it. They lie to you. Here are three I remember off the top of my head:
1) They take a man's statement out of context. Remember the guy talking about how there's so much CO2 in the oceans? The way it's in the film, they make it sound like he's saying out CO2 contributions are insignificant because the ocean dwarfs our influence. In context, he was actually explaining that the ocean CO2 reservoir makes our influence MORE dangerous: because if we warm up the planet a little, the ocean releases more CO2 which will amplify our impact. Don't believe me? Google the guy. He's publicly protested how they used his statements.
2) Blatantly cherry picking data. They show you a nice chart of solar activity vs. temperature, showing the correlation. And then suddenly they cut off the chart... right as the correlation breaks down. See, more recently the earth's temperature continued to rise while solar activity leveled off. Funny how they cut that off. Why wouldn't they show it to you?
3) The best was outright fabrication of data. They showed you a chart claiming most of the warming occurred before 1940. They attributed that chart to NASA. NASA's actual data differs, most of the warming most definitely occurred after 1940. Fabricating data is lying. Why would they lie to you?
I bet you don't remember these three points in the film. I bet you've never even watched it. We'll find out in your response when you claim ignorance or dodge
Deuce, I'm in the process of moving so I don't have access to my full computer (only my cellphone). So I'll get back to your silly post in a week or two
Meteorology is a science also, and look how many times they get the weather forecast wrong.
If they cant forecast the weather accurately, then how the hell can they predict what the climate will be 50 years from now??
Yeah okay, and so how many times have they predicted the force of the hurricane or tropical storm correctly??Yeah, OK. So next time they tell you a hurricane or tornado is coming your way, don't take them seriously and we can see what happens.
Yeah, OK. So next time they tell you a hurricane or tornado is coming your way, don't take them seriously and we can see what happens.
Yeah okay, and so how many times have they predicted the force of the hurricane or tropical storm correctly??
I lost count when they called it a hurricane 4 or 5, and it wound up to be a 2 or a 3 (or even less)
The meteorologists said Harvey was nothing to worry about. Oops!
Actually, hurricane storm predictions have improved over the years, particularly the longer-range predictions. That includes both intensity and track. (See below)Yeah okay, and so how many times have they predicted the force of the hurricane or tropical storm correctly??
Anecdotes are not evidence. That's basic scientific literacy. Just FYI.I lost count when they called it a hurricane 4 or 5, and it wound up to be a 2 or a 3 (or even less)
For the Houston area they were correct, Harvey was not a big wind/storm surge event, but a rain event.The meteorologists said Harvey was nothing to worry about. Oops!
Good luck.
Says the guy who still wont admit the CO2 chart I posted is accurate :lamo
Desert Storm is on "your team" so you wont contradict him, even when you know for a fact he's wrong. This is the behavior of a fanatic.
The "good luck" wish was in reference to his move. I have no idea what chart you're talking about.
Claim ignorance rather than disagree with your team. Makes sense.
No they havent gotten warmer deuce, I should know because I live here (on and off).Toronto's winters have, in fact, gotten warmer. But your faith said it hasn't, just like your faith said the CO2 chart is wrong
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?