- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
1.)I was correcting your error by stating it was about anti-discrimination.
2.)And my point stands and is accurate that the laws are similar in their effect, forced servitude and and rape
1.) dont need to they stand on thier own footing
2.) not using them to defend any "argument" im simply stating facts which they prove.
this is called another deflection and nobody honest, educated and objective falls for itIs this a pattern with you (just so I know in the future). You ask for something, get it, deny you got it, then claim the other person can't provide it?
We do provide the facts that make it not so.
Actually they don't. There is several issues with the logic presented by the court justices in those cases.
says you but your opinions, feelings and philosophies dont matter to the law, rights, constitution and court cases.
As I said, people who want to force servitude and exert power and control over others won't recognize or admit it1.) never made that mistake because its not about it, like you claimed wasnt said which was a lie
2.) nope it still fails because you haven't been able to support your claim, that's how it works around here, you made a claim now its on you to support it with facts.
there is no forced servitude as already pointed out to you by facts, laws, rights, the constitution and court cases that all disagree . . . so tell us . . what supports your false claims besides your opinion?
facts win again
That answers my question, for future referencethis is called another deflection and nobody honest, educated and objective falls for it
you havent provided anything that supports your claim, im looking for FACTS
your feelings and opinions dont matter to anybody
says you but your opinions, feelings and philosophies dont matter to the law, rights, constitution and court cases.
As I said, people who want to force servitude and exert power and control over others won't recognize or admit it
Why do you even bother arguing with libertarians? They're purely driven by emotion and beyond the reach of reason.
Oh? Ok, so how is forcing someone to serve others not involuntary servitude? Well?
People that want to deny gays in places of public accommodation wedding cakes are doing exactly that.
Oh? Ok, so how is forcing someone to serve others not involuntary servitude? Well?
Uhmm you took on the job.
As I said, people who want to force servitude and exert power and control over others won't recognize or admit it
That answers my question, for future reference
And then there is this drivel that you can't help but repeat. Do you know how justices come to their decisions? Maybe you should figure that out before you repeat this to me again.
I don't disagree with you. The law is a smokescreen for attacks on the LGBT community. If it wasn't, it's broadness would address other groups, such as atheists for example. The actual legal intent of such a law, however, is not really problematic, and people can choose to associate with whomever they want. I support businesses having the right to choose who they will serve for whatever reason. I also support free speech and freedom of the press, and I would encourage people to take out full page ads in newspapers identifying businesses who choose not to serve certain groups of people.
The context here is Indiana and guess what. Indiana doesn't have a law protecting homosexuals from discrimination and a lot of businesses opened before such laws were in place elsewhereDid they involuntarily open a business that serves the general public and obtain a business license to do so? Did they involuntarily agree to the terms and conditions that come with that license?
What? That doesn't make any sense.
soooooo you dont have anything other than your opinions, feelings and philosophies. Thats what i thought
facts win again
You just gave a great idea about a Nazi and a frauline walking in and ordering a wedding cake.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?