- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 1,828
- Reaction score
- 423
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
You pointed it out several times yourself
You pointed it out several times yourselfyes that lie keeps being repeated but yet the contradiction hasnt been pointed out. Very telling. Please in your next post point out the factual contradiction, thanks.
I bet this request is dodged again.
So then my original point stands, he IS what Indiana wants.i don't believe that we can recall him. he's governor because there was a lot of apathy and because his opponent, nice guy that he was / is, ran a really poor campaign.
If they wanted something to facilitate sin, I believe He would indeed turn them away. If they came in repentance, He would accept themWWJD? Do you think Jesus would turn someone away because they were gay? What do you think Jesus would think of the person who turned someone away because they were black or gay or just because they thought the person was "icky"? "Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren....ye have done it unto me".
Again, they offered to serve them, just without the swastikas. I see nothing in the aforementioned principle that suggests this would be inappropriate.Even still, the principle that a business open to the public serves the public is fairly straightforward and the benefits of that as a whole would seem to easily outweigh the harm in a few instances of a few businesses serving people they might REALLY not like a whole lot.
It's no different in my view than the ACLU defending the right of those idiots to march.
Government shouldn't be giving anything to businesses in the first placeThen the business should not expect anything from the government.
This LAW is a reaffirmation of rightsThis Bill is about denial of rights.
But the actual legislators were warned, were given chances to assuage critics, and didn't do it. And Pence embraced those voices when he invited them to the bill signing. They made their bed by trying to appease bigots. Not sorry they're paying a price for it.
He would say, "Go, and sin no more"
I am gals you realize that if it is biased it is only so against bigotry, self inflicted stupidity, ignorance and mindless zealotry, all conditions that can be easily cured.so happy for your non biased fair view of this
Actually I do, on both counts, that is why I can't suffer bigots.you dont have to like, or understand religion...
Sure, I have no problem with them praying anytime or anywhere they wish.but how about some tolerance from your side?
I do not want anything from anyone other then them not to discriminate. It is the price to belong in civilized secular society. There are plenty of **** holes in the world where theocratic regimes rule and I ma sure they accept like minded zealots.you all want that from everyone else...
Sure in what form?how about just a little back......and seeing this from the eyes of those who dont believe what you believe
BS that is a pathetic excuse. Any business can change formats any time.and when businesses have been open for decades, and passed from one generation to another.....it isnt always feasible to set it up as a something else
If they wanted something to facilitate sin, I believe He would indeed turn them away. If they came in repentance, He would accept them
Do you honestly believe that Jesus would condone the bigoted actions of the florist or the baker? If you honestly believe so, then you do not know the man.
Again, they offered to serve them, just without the swastikas. I see nothing in the aforementioned principle that suggests this would be inappropriate.
No, of course I can't force a Jewish baker to do a Hitler cake for me ....but I might sue him or her for not. It's their choice. And a jury of peers can rule against me...or for me.
But again, Peter, let's apply some common sense. Are KKK members - or say Storm Front members gonna line up to get a Jewish baker to bake a cake with Hitler on it? I'd say not unless they were purposely wanting to cause problems and that type of harassment is against the law.
The cake for lesbians incident and the florist incident that became so exploited by media ...were much more isolated than the faux example I posted above.
As I said, it depends on the circumstancesand would he refuse to serve the person?
I don't believe the actions are bigoted and I believe He would indeed condone the actions of the florist and baker. He would not condone the homosexual behavior. Rather He would offer healingDo you honestly believe that Jesus would condone the bigoted actions of the florist or the baker? If you honestly believe so, then you do not know the man.
You pointed it out several times yourself
I'm always reserved around those who claim to "know" Jesus.
I don't believe the actions are bigoted and I believe He would indeed condone the actions of the florist and baker. He would not condone the homosexual behavior. Rather He would offer healing
translation: it cant be done because the claim is a lie, thats what I thought, please let us know when you can do so, thank you
I know more than most, I'm sure. I certainly know He would not condone sinIf you actually believe that...then you need to study his life a little harder. You obviously know very little about his teachings.
Its not hard to know the man if you read his work. The problem that most people who proclaim his name is that they are more interested in politics than emulating the life of the man that they claim to worship.
Just ask them why Pence can't answer a yes or no question.
Ask them why Pence and the legislature want to "fix" the language.
Corporate boycotts do make a difference--as did the NCAA statement today .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?