I don't follow. Any reference to the "commerce clause" would ignore more than 99% of the actual sentence. What part of do you think should not have been ignored?I see nothing creative about ignoring half of a sentence.
The free market is a voluntary exchange of goods, services, and property. The government has no business interfering with such voluntary exchanges.
"We have been an active member of the Indiana business community and a key job creator for more than a decade," Scott McCorkle, CEO of the Salesforce Marketing Cloud division, wrote in a letter to Indiana lawmakers. "Our success is fundamentally based on our ability to attract and retain the best and most diverse pool of highly skilled employees, regardless of gender, religious affiliation, ethnicity or sexual orientation."
Healthcare is a service. A privately owned hospital is absolutely a business.
There are public hospitals.
I don't follow. Any reference to the "commerce clause" would ignore more than 99% of the actual sentence. What part of do you think should not have been ignored?
thats not an answer LOL
what if the "private" hospital is the only one around for miles or at least within distance to save your life?
So if you were in a car accident, and needed treatment basically with in the next 1hour or you die but the only hospital withing the hour window wouldnt take you as a patient thats ok?
That is exactly what is happening in America. If you want to run your business according to your Christian beliefs, you can literally be forced out of business. That form of discrimination is celebrated by liberals all across America
The whole Homosexual lobby and agenda.
That doesn't make a bit of difference.
reality proves your opinions wrong as usual
it may not make a big a difference to your opinions and philosophies but those are meaningless and luckily, in this case, our country, rights, laws and freedom isnt based on such mentally retarded "ideas"
This is the commerce clause:
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
This is what the government sees:
To regulate Commerce;
Perhaps to someone who didn't read it...
Let me spoon feed it to you shall I? I've bolded the sections which clearly contradict your posts which simply parrots the far left false narrative.
The rest of the article outs the lie and sets the record straight. Sorry you don't like facts but hyper-partisans rarely do.
Reagan ignoring AIDS until he absolutely couldn't anymore.
You know that most states have public accommodations laws, right? Where's your tenth amendment argument now?
Oh, lol.This is the commerce clause:
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
This is what the government sees:
To regulate Commerce;
It's all fruit to me, discrimination is discrimination. If you're open to the public then refusing business for reasons other than something which causes a demonstrable harm to your business shouldn't be allowed.
1.)thats easy and already the basis of why its not run that way LMAO!1.)I welcome you to support it without falling into some retarded right to service argument.
2.)I have yet to someone manage to avoid that argument, but you're more than welcome to try.
Can I get a witness?
I don't know what you're talking about.
Neither is The Ambiguously Gay Duo. Part of the problem is that we even need 'protected classes' in the first place.Yosemite Sam isn't a protected class.
Neither is refusing service to a legally armed citizen. There are many who would point to credible data in support of a ban on various minorities based on crime rates of that demographic, yet we don't tolerate it, and those crime rates do not exist for legally armed citizens. Discriminating against whole groups hinders commerce, and so a business open to the public should have to demonstrate a need to remove a specific individual.Refusing service to gays isn't a safety/insurance issue.
Then I have to patronize businesses that don't discriminate against me. Problem solved
Then I'll think any business that actually does so is run by a dickhead and I'll probably go on social media to complain about them.
No one should be forced to sell anything to anyone. A free market is all about voluntary exchange.
For most businesses, the ones run by rational owners, the only color that matters is green.
I am an atheist in a mixed race marriage and I think private, non-essential businesses should be able to discriminate for whatever stupid reason they want. And we have the right to publicly shame them out of business. I sure don't want a theocracy.
Yes,and if a business owner does not want to do business that facilitates what he considers wrong behavior, then he is discriminated against by the government.
What's odd here is that my argument favors allowing private parties, including businesses, to discriminate based on their personal beliefs. The opposing argument favors allowing government to discriminate. The real evil is when government discriminates
I don't profess to be a US Constitution expert, but doesn't the Commerce Clause give government the right to do just that - determine the laws and regulations under which intrastate and interstate commerce may be conducted?
Better yet, let's quit trying to pretend that the anti-discrimination laws are anything but intolerant bigotry
If I can get booted out simply for being legally armed, then others can get booted out simply for being gay. Isn't Equality™ grand?
What are the specific "rights, laws and [LOL!] freedoms" that permit you to compel service from a private hospital?reality proves your opinions wrong as usual
it may not make a big a difference to your opinions and philosophies but those are meaningless and luckily, in this case, our country, rights, laws and freedom isnt based on such mentally retarded "ideas"
Only interstate. However, changes in technology since 1789 have made nearly all commerce interstate in nature. Even the smallest local business relies on a great deal of interstate (and often international) shipping and manufacturing.
Oh how nice. I see you drug out an old picture of Democrats in action. How nice. Thanks for that.
You're welcome. They're all Republicans now, so I'm glad you have some old pictures of your new friends.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?