1.) false based on legality and definition they are
2.) see #1
3.) again see #1 EEO/AA protects all of us
4.) actually its based on facts, AS MY STSTMENT IS WRITTEN, its 100% true and trying to dishonestly change it to something else is a complete failure and straw man.
if you disagree simply post the law that says "i must serve gays", you will completely fail and your lie or ignorance of the law will be shown.
5.) thank you for proving me 100% right, see where you use dthe word IF, that proves me right.
maybe read the thread before you jump in the middle and totally own your own posts.
the claim was made that there is force to serve protected groupp, that is 100% false. No law exists.
what you just posted an example of AFTER the if is a law that makes ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION a crime . . NOT simply not serving anybody who belongs to a groups/
so the fact remains i can in fact deny service to anybody i want
what i can not do is violate peoples rights or break the law
simply denying service does NOT do that
6.) i did no that and it was exactly my point, thank you for making it for me. Next time try to understand what is being discussed and you wont repeat the mistake you made. Thanks!
1.)Give me the name of one of these rights.
2.):roll: It makes no difference at all. Can a businesses be sued for not servicing someone for a reason that is banned? Yes or no?
She wouldn't even be allowed in the store.
It's a private business that is open only to heterosexual white males. There will be a security guard at the door. If you're not a heterosexual white male then the security guard will not let you in.that doesnt answer the question either. you seem to keep dodging.
is your grocery story a public access business? im assuming yes since you didnt say otherwise so now the question is when she walks up to your store how is she stopped and what is the reason why?
I thought title ii of the Civil Rights Act I'm not aware that a business can get away with refusing service to a black person because they are black or to a female because they are female.
1.) like i said equal and civil rights and many laws behind that, if thats not specific enough you are **** out of luck LMAO Ill never play your dishonest game you will lose as always. are you claiming those rights dont exists?
its like asking me if you could be arrested for sex, and then i ask you if the sex was consensual, and you say it doesn't matter. sorry but it in fact DOES matter.
so i will ask you AGAIN, try not to dodge it and post honestly this time: what business, what someone and what "banned reasons" do you speak of
It doesn't matter what I say. She is a woman and the store doesn't sell to women. She will be removed and refused service like all other women.
???????? why are you responding to this? oh oh lol
wow thats a nice long waste of a post based on your biased and dishonest opinions and feelings that dont matter. LMAO
Nobody educated, honest and objective falls for "the gay agenda", "force of acceptance", "market will fix itself" dishonesty mentally retard "rhetoric", it just gets mocked and laughed at for the desperation it is.
you challeneges are 10- 0 lifetime against me and nothing has changed
your post fails and facts win again
that doesnt answer the question either. you seem to keep dodging.
is your grocery story a public access business? im assuming yes since you didnt say otherwise so now the question is when she walks up to your store how is she stopped and what is the reason why?
You are correct. "Tolerance" and bigotry are a two-way street. The gays who are repelled by a baker's religious beliefs and who crave to force the baker to serve them are not being tolerant, they are self-righteous gay crusaders backed force.
For those who actually are tolerant, its not that difficult. If a person does not want to trade, date, or associate with you...you move on. If you don't want to trade, date, or associate them, they move on. THAT is tolerance.
But for those that can't move on, like the gay persecutors of the baker(s), they are little more than stalkers - they just can't stand the thought of being rejected and, like all stalkers, wish to destroy those who exercise their right to associate with whom they please.
Too bad they can't be locked up.
1.) It's a private business that is open only to heterosexual white males.
2.) There will be a security guard at the door. If you're not a heterosexual white male then the security guard will not let you in.
It's a privately owned business.... Like most businesses. The is no membership.1.) a private business? youll need to further explain. Is it a nonprofit membership?
2.) well i cant really expand on this until you answer #1 but out of curiosity how will the guard know a person is a heterosexual white male
1.):roll: Yes, so what rights do civil rights laws protect? The right to ________. Just answer the damn question already.
2.)That makes no sense.
3.)Obviously I'm talking about businesses affected by the law. Duh?
Let's drop the heterosexual part. Let's just stick with white males. It's easy for the security guard to tell if someone is a white male.1.) a private business? youll need to further explain. Is it a nonprofit membership?
2.) well i cant really expand on this until you answer #1 but out of curiosity how will the guard know a person is a heterosexual white male
Because I felt like it and I knew the answer.
ahhhhhhh and there you go, now you added a VERY important part that is not being discussed
that would be true the civil rights act does not allow you to ILLEGALLY DISCRIMINATE
what i asked for is a law that force me to do serve with gays?
so if im make widgets and a gay guy comes in and wants 5000 widgets by this afternoon, what law FORCES me to serve him because he is gay?
Just wanted to highlight you one more time. Weird, I get infracted for stuff like this all the time, wonder what will happen to you? In any event, I placed the 1 beside your typo, I think you missed it.
Tim-
Computer gate that validates if you are 100% ma-male.
1.)It's a privately owned business.... Like most businesses. The is no membership.
2.)He will use his discretion.
Something like fifteen states have anti-discriminatory laws specifically targeting sexual orientation and gender identity. This bonehead politician who signed this bill is on the wrong side of history.
So you're repeal part or all of the CRA as well, especially Title II. Whites Only, etc.? Maybe it's just gays who shouldn't have any protection from discrimination?
but you didnt :shrug:
wasnt your answer to give lol
I can respond to anything I want. Get over it.
1.) roll your eyes all you want but im not playing any dishonesty silly games. google civil rights since you dont understand them
3.) thats what i thought, another dodge, that doesnt answer anything. WHAT LAW?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?