Insulting is a sign of desperation and weakness.
The "screaming" began when the left completely mis-interpreted an already stupid law, and incited an internet frenzy. For once accept responsibility for the bigoted and hateful response against these innocent people.
Condoning with silence the death threats received only reveals the innate dishonesty that created the concept of "tortured language" to fool the nation. This shows no signs of that abject dishonesty fading any time soon
At Memories Pizza, New Threats Arise; Press's Determination to Ignore Them Continues (See Update)The pizza place hasn't been sued, hasn't been fined, hasn't been boycotted, hasn't been threatened or picketed or anything that would actually force them to close. They're just milking this controversy for more attention and trying to play the victim. And apparently it's working. The article said that people giving these jerks money.
Sometimes, a person's conscience is no better than dog****, as in the case of people who so terribly want to discriminate against the demographic of their ire.
Yes, I do tend to 'dodge' (ie ignore) ridiculous hypotheticals. More should do the same.Dodge noted.
Sometimes, a person's conscience is no better than dog****, as in the case of people who so terribly want to discriminate against the demographic of their ire.
lol @ not having a response to this obvious fact.
Actually, if your patronage is turned down, that is indeed the free market
No. They refused to make him a specialized cake that they don't normally make. They did not refuse him service on the basis of him being gay. Find a video of a Christian being denied service by a gay vendor, just for being Christian, and you'd have a valid comparison.
wrong, in the free market, the price of goods at equilibrium.
are subject to the laws of supply and demand. when you artificially restrict supply or demand, it is no longer a free market.
That appears to be a non sequiturBull ****, I have to deal with people of extreme faith all the time. Ayn Radian libertarians are the worst with the Jesus freaks coming in as a close second.
How true. How true.
A gay patron can sue a Christian store owner for refusing specialized services and win while a gay store owner can refuse the same services to a Christian patron and get off scott free.
How true. How true.
A gay patron can sue a Christian store owner for refusing specialized services and win while a gay store owner can refuse the same services to a Christian patron and get off scott free.
Welcome to the double standard, folks!
That's poor logic, aka a a straw man. One some merchants choose to do is not the same as what the free market signals. And when a merchant chooses not to provide a service or product for a same sex wedding, that does not indicate the free market saying, "We don't like your kind 'round here."Interesting. Taking the intent of that particular message to its logical conclusion, what the free market is signaling to lgbt's is "We don't like your kind 'round here."
That's only true if you ignore that religion is a protected class. So no. They REALLY wouldn't get off Scott free.
Despite the error in that sentiment, freedom allows people have consciences that might be offensive to othersSometimes, a person's conscience is no better than dog****, as in the case of people who so terribly want to discriminate against the demographic of their ire.
If the customer said "I'd like to order 50 pizzas for my gay wedding?"
Despite the error in that sentiment, freedom allows people have consciences that might be offensive to others
Really. So in your mind, you can go to a Muslim deli and demand a ham sandwich even though he doesn't carry ham. Is that right?
So you are saying that you can't contract a cake from those bakeries?
If you wanted the Muslims deli to send messages with his product with which he doesn't agree he would have every right to say no, and would gain wide public support. If you insisted a Muslim bakery decorate a cake with Gay men holding hands and explained it was for their marriage celebration, they would likely say no as well.Really. So in your mind, you can go to a Muslim deli and demand a ham sandwich even though he doesn't carry ham. Is that right?
So based on your question, you would say that the Muslim deli should make you a ham sandwich because their product is "sandwiches," correct?
I watched the video and no one was denied business for being a homosexual.
Although you're absolutely right, if every other thread on this topic anything is go by, he's probably citing a case that isn't actually discrimination.
A federal judge has ruled in favor of a former FedEx employee in a religious discrimination lawsuit.
Eric Weathers sued the shipping company after they banned him from discussing his faith and Bible-based degree at work.
A university that expelled a Christian graduate student from its counseling program because she refused to affirm homosexual relationships may have violated her Constitutional rights, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today.
A North Carolina jury has decided in favor of a conservative professor of criminology who claimed that his academic institution denied him a promotion for ideological reasons.
The jury ruled Thursday in favor of Mike Adams, who back in 2006 was denied a promotion to a full professorship by the University of North Carolina – Wilmington.
If you wanted the Muslims deli to send messages with his product with which he doesn't agree he would have every right to say no, and would gain wide public support. If you insisted a Muslim bakery decorate a cake with Gay men holding hands and explained it was for their marriage celebration, they would likely say no as well.
Would you accept their decision and find another bakery or would you want them shut down and hounded out of business, as happened to the Christian family?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?