- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 12,895
- Reaction score
- 2,909
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
It may have been Mr Nick's "point" but his words denied the facts about the corporate mission of Catholic Health Initiatives.
I mean, you use the defense of "those fetuses are not persons with legal rights"?
In malpractice case, Catholic hospital argues fetuses aren’t people | The Colorado Independent
So if a doctor had aborted those babies rather than not answering his pager he wouldn't have been charged with anything?
Ohhh, but many want it to be. I see many thinly veiled bible based laws coming out with regards to abortion.
No this is a situation in which an individual is using stupid law and logic against those who apply it.
One doesn't have to agree with a law to use it as defense.
Abortion doctors murder babies violating their oath of "do no harm" and they get away with it by declaring the "fetus" isn't a viable form of life... That apparently is the official stance in law - hence a viable defense.
This is nothing more than a case of "whats good for you is good for me" or "the same laws that apply to you apply to me."
One can't argue that abortions should be legal then turn around and claim the opposite when it suits their desires in litigation.
Because if harm comes to my unborn child because of the negligence or nefarious activity of another there is a need for justice.
yes, because the same expectations of being "on call" exist for all professions.
What if that Doctor was attending to another patient?
I'm replying to a post that drew a comparison between a doctor "on call" and your general individual missing a phone call. Clearly the expectations and responsibilities are not the same.
The above bears repeating...over and over and over again. Thus those who CLAIM women who have abortions are MURDERERS...can't back it up...period, using the guise of the law to make his or her argument.
And I am making a point you fail to grasp. On call Doctor can get a page but be with another patient. Is the Doctor suppose to up right an leave the patient he or she is with to answer another call?
And I am making a point you fail to grasp. On call Doctor can get a page but be with another patient. Is the Doctor suppose to up right an leave the patient he or she is with to answer another call?
One can take a call without having to "up right and leave" a patient
And doctors are on call when they're not seeing patients.
Shh... you know nothing.
Being a Doctor on call can mean many different things. You have Interns and Residents who work on call so they can see enough patients to graduate. A Resident is considered a full fledged Doctor. Intern, not so much. A Doctor can also be on call at home. But they tend to get called in a few times a night. So odds are you can be on call and seeing a patient. Specially if you live in a city.
Going to the ER at night is proof of this. You can wait hours before actually seeing a Doctor.
Nothing I wrote precludes such. What I wrote specifically speaks to a doctor being on call and how such is different than your average person missing a phone call. Such doesn't say a doctor can never have a justifiable reason for missing a phone call.
Okay riddle me this Dr. Chuckles. I find being with another patient who's in worse condition is justifiable.
this wasn't an intern or a resident
The doctor was not with another patient
Which is why I went further with it.. but you just picked up two words in it. Way to go, you are 10% closer to learning how to read.
And we aren't arguing this case specifically. Keep trying. One day you'll learn how to read.
none of what you wrote applis to this case
No mstter how you word it, none of your hypotheticals will justify this doctors' negligence
No, *you* aren't arguing this case, which is understandable.
Okay riddle me this Dr. Chuckles. I find being with another patient who's in worse condition is justifiable.
I am not justifying anything. I saying **** happens. There were PLENTY of Doctors at the hospital that day. There was two Doctors sued.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?