- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 57,470
- Reaction score
- 14,587
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
He said it wasn't illegal to threaten a judge i proved him wrong.
He said it wasn't illegal to threaten a judge i proved him wrong.Are you pretending to understand the law now?
If so, what elements do you need to prove a violation of that statute?
That should be in the Sandbox. Jay, not your post, the one you replied to.That's a very bigoted post. Are you sure you want to be so abusive and intolerant?
that is why he needs to be questioned on it don't you think.Good luck proving that this was a threat to assault, kidnap, murder, etc.
it proves me 100% correct facts don't care about your feelings.
your projection arguments are your issue and no one else's.No, it doesn't. You're just being childish now. You're talking with grownups. Act like it.
The Bible doesn't say it's murder, and that's the only possible foundation for the argument.
Rich conservative women will always have access to abortion, and they can and will take advantage of it, and have historically.
yep it is. i find it amazing that they can't actually argue the topic.Unless you like flies, it best to let this one go.
Its quite obvious he means that the people will rise up and there will be a mandate to reform the system.that is why he needs to be questioned on it don't you think.
he told them that he would make them pay. that usually implies some sort of violence.
need to open an investigation i guess. you are all in favor of those right?
however back to your argument that it is legal to threaten a judge no it isn't.
nor is it legal to threaten a court.
in fact it is highly illegal as i have just proven.
I don't have a conspiracy theory. He is the one that said it so he needs to be questioned by the FBI for threatening a SCOTUS justice actually 2 of them.Its quite obvious he means that the people will rise up and there will be a mandate to reform the system.
But please, continue your conspiracy theorizing.
To your second point, the law is quite specific on what constitutes a threat and the quotes from Schumer do not fall under this very specific requirements. So, at this point, all you have proven is that you have no idea how to read this particular law.
Given what he did was not a threat under the wording of the law (no statement about murder, kidnapping, etc), Schumer did not actually threaten anyone. This is the nature of your conspiracy theorizing.I don't have a conspiracy theory. He is the one that said it so he needs to be questioned by the FBI for threatening a SCOTUS justice actually 2 of them.
Actually i do. YOu said it wasn't illegal to threaten a court or judge.
i proved you wrong that is all i needed to do.
It if very much illegal to threaten a court or a judge.
So what do you really want? Permanent one party Leftist rule? Methinks so.
Given what he did was not a threat under the wording of the law (no statement about murder, kidnapping, etc), Schumer did not actually threaten anyone. This is the nature of your conspiracy theorizing.
So again, you are laughably bad at reading this very clearly worded law.
deflection and concession noted.Given what he did was not a threat under the wording of the law (no statement about murder, kidnapping, etc), Schumer did not actually threaten anyone. This is the nature of your conspiracy theorizing.
So again, you are laughably bad at reading this very clearly worded law.
Man, you are bad at this if you don't even understand my argument. Please show me where I explicitly stated that it is legal to threaten a judge.deflection and concession noted.
Your argument was that it is not illegal to threaten a court or a judge.
we are talking about your argument here.
I posted actual facts that say it is 100% illegal to threaten a court or a judge.
you are wrong.
now you are attempting to deflect the argument to something irrelevent.
Actually I have no real opinion on Schumer one way or another.Legal or not, you will defend the prick because he's on your team.
Wait, the Bible is not our laws. And rich women will always have funds to buy what they want.
The major problem with Roe v Wade is it was not correctly decided and the plaintiff wanted not to proceed.
You will see in about a week.i thought you guys hated bigots? yet here we are yet again.
she hasn't made any rulings so how is she an activist judge?
do you have a crystal ball? please tell us. PS what are next weeks lottery numbers.You will see in about a week.
When our modern Fifth Horseman declares Medicare unconstitutional, we will see the horror of this appointment. I don't think most people realize the depth of this corrosive ideology. These are ideologues that do not believe in precedent (unless it serves their twisted purposes). They are crusaders bent on establishing a theological order, to "purifying" the law in their image of a constitutional order that never existed.Meh, the easy way would be to just expand Medicare to cover everyone... Is Medicare unconstitutional? Asking for my senior friends...
Can you explain exactly how both the president and senate following the procedure layed out in the constitution is a power grab. Is it a power grab when a democrat appoints a left leaning judge.
It’s rather clear you don’t understand what a power grab is.
A good example of what a power grab would be what you a hoping the democrats will do if they win the election.
Funny how you are condemning the right for what you hope the left does. Does a good job of showing who is a partisan hack.
Funny how you are condemning the right for what you hope the left does.
You do know that will never happen do you not?It will get fixed next year, so hang in there, things will improve.
Even after it was PROVED that the Obama admin was briefed on the Clinton campaigns intent to fabricate the whole Russia/Collussion hoax, idiot leftists just continue to ignore the facts and regurgitate the lies. Because they are mindless little partisan muppets...and the DNC knows it. The impotent little simps are so ****ing stupid that they not only KNOW they are being manipulated like a sock with the DNCs hand up their ass...they LIKE it.House intel transcripts show top Obama officials had no 'empirical evidence' of Trump-Russia collusion
Newly released transcripts of interviews from the House Intelligence Committee’s long-running Russia investigation reveal top Obama officials acknowledged that they knew of no “empirical evidence” of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 election, despite their concerns...www.foxnews.com
facts do not care about your feelings.
Newly released transcripts of interviews from the House Intelligence Committee’s long-running Russia investigation reveal top Obama officials acknowledged that they knew of no “empirical evidence” of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 election, despite their concerns and suspicions.
The transcripts, which were released by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., revealed top Obama officials were questioned over whether they had or had seen evidence of such collusion, coordination or conspiracy -- the issue that drove the FBI's initial case and later the special counsel probe.
“I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,” former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified in 2017. “That’s not to say that there weren’t concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.”
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, according to the transcript of her interview, was asked about the same issue. Power replied: “I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn’t read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community.”
When asked again, she said: “I am not.”
Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice was asked the same question.
“To the best of my recollection, there wasn’t anything smoking, but there were some things that gave me pause,” she said, according to her transcribed interview, in response to whether she had any evidence of conspiracy. “I don’t recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect that I saw…conspiracy prior to my departure.”
When asked whether she had any evidence of “coordination,” Rice replied: “I don’t recall any intelligence or evidence to that effect.”
When asked about collusion, Rice replied: “Same answer.”
Former Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes was asked the same question during his House Intelligence interview.
“I wouldn’t have received any information on any criminal or counterintelligence investigations into what the Trump campaign was doing, so I would not have seen that information,” Rhodes said.
When pressed again, he said: “I saw indications of potential coordination, but I did not see, you know, the specific evidence of the actions of the Trump campaign.”
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch also said that she did "not recall that being briefed up to me."
"I can't say that it existed or not," Lynch said, referring to evidence of collusion, conspiracy or coordination.
McCabe was asked during his interview in 2017 what was the most “damning or important piece of evidence in the dossier that” he “now knows is true.”
McCabe replied: “We have not been able to prove the accuracy of all the information.”
“You don’t know if it’s true or not?” a House investigator asked, to which McCabe replied: “That’s correct.”
This has been all over the news the fact you can't accept facts is no ones issue but yours. Facts do not change because you don't like them.
I wait for you to now tell me that all of these obama officials were lying. if they were lying then they need to be arrested and brought up on charges yes?
at this point there is no getting around it.Even after it was PROVED that the Obama admin was briefed on the Clinton campaigns intent to fabricate the whole Russia/Collussion hoax, idiot leftists just continue to ignore the facts and regurgitate the lies. Because they are minldess little partisan muppets...and the DNC knows it. The impotent little simps are so ****ing stupid that they not only KNOW they are being manipulated like a sock with the DNCs hand up their ass...they LIKE it.
Even after it was PROVED that the Obama admin was briefed on the Clinton campaigns intent to fabricate the whole Russia/Collussion hoax, idiot leftists just continue to ignore the facts and regurgitate the lies. Because they are minldess little partisan muppets...and the DNC knows it. The impotent little simps are so ****ing stupid that they not only KNOW they are being manipulated like a sock with the DNCs hand up their ass...they LIKE it.
That's complete bullshit.
OTOH, I wouldnt have expected a Democratic president to miss the opportunity either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?