Illegal Migrant Kills NJ Mom, Her Daughter in Horrific Wrong-Way Crash

[dairyair]

not migrants - people illegally flooding into the USA

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116759/witnesses/HMTG-118-IF02-Wstate-RectorR-20240117.pdf

one report - The Biden Administration Has Brought an Additional 6.7 Million Illegal Aliens into the U.S.: The impact of Biden policies can be seen by comparing the current situation with priorpresidencies. In FY 2023, there were 3,201,144 encounters between inadmissible aliens and theU.S. government nationwide. In 2016, the last year of the Obama administration, there were690,433 such encounters. This 460 percent increase in inadmissible alien encounters is a directand obvious result of Biden policies which deliberately encourage, facilitate and reward illegalimmigration.


C'mon you can google - you KNOW how bad it was during Biden years




its you who doesn't understand legal vs illegal

this guy who killed this woman and daughter was someone you and your side fight hard to keep in the USA

Seriously? An opinion piece?

Robert Rector
Senior Research Fellow
The Heritage Foundation

By a RW foundation.

If you want to take the conspiracy theory position, so be it.

But you clearly don't know the difference between legal and illegal

I fought for no one.
You admit to your losing position when you have to resort to ad homs so you can feel better about your bad opinions.

 

[dairyair]

omg

you can't differentiate between legally coming into the USA and illegally

figure that out, then come back

Those links are likely valid. But don't support your original claim of illegals.
Those links just show migrants in total.

See above for the thread leading to this point.

Here's a refresher for you.
You claim 1 thing, and show proof of something completely different.

 

[hecatmoggie]

Seriously? An opinion piece?



By a RW foundation.

If you want to take the conspiracy theory position, so be it.

But you clearly don't know the difference between legal and illegal

I fought for no one.
You admit to your losing position when you have to resort to ad homs so you can feel better about your bad opinions.

not real hard

this guy in this article that was allowed to stay in the USA because of liberal Democrat policies? ILLEGAL

your side - not mine

Trump is ridding this country of the illegally here people - everyone should support him

but you won't and your side won't ... you WANT these people like Raul to be in the USA - don't ya ?

 

[dairyair]

not real hard

this guy in this article that was allowed to stay in the USA because of liberal Democrat policies? ILLEGAL

your side - not mine

Trump is ridding this country of the illegally here people - everyone should support him

but you won't and your side won't ... you WANT these people like Raul to be in the USA - don't ya ?

Still being silly, now it appears willfully. I also don't fit any of your child like boxes. You can crawl into one, I won't.
Lets focus on adult conversation.

trump is raiding businesses.
Not focusing on his stated agenda. Round up illegal immigrants that are criminals. This dude of the OP had a record dating back to 08. trump let him walk freely and drive freely. And then he killed someone while driving drunk. Because trump wasn't focused on his task at hand.

 

[Ouroboros]

I am nattering because you seem to think the walls have made or will make a difference.
They haven't made any difference. But to alter some routes.

There's nothing for me to counter from you. You made a false post, that's it.

The point is only false to you because you automatically sneer at anything that impedes the invasion of illegals. Are you also of the opinion that no one should have police on the streets because the police don't manage to prevent every crime?

 

[L88]

The point is only false to you because you automatically sneer at anything that impedes the invasion of illegals. Are you also of the opinion that no one should have police on the streets because the police don't manage to prevent every crime?

This is the way Progs think.

 

[lynnwinslow]

This is the way Progs think.

Oh please.
You can probably find some tic tocker spewing nonsense like that for clicks but most "Progs" don't think "no one should have police on the streets".

 

[dairyair]

The point is only false to you because you automatically sneer at anything that impedes the invasion of illegals. Are you also of the opinion that no one should have police on the streets because the police don't manage to prevent every crime?

LOL. I don't sneer at it. It's about as good a solution as a bandaid is to a sliced artery. It's very temporary and not a solution.

Unless we wall off the E, W coasts. Canada. The entire Gulf.
Under the ground. And over our heads. All those are routes that can be used and walls at the southern border does nothing to address those other routes.

What prompted such an ignorant sentence about police on the streets? Can you remain on the topic?

If there is a lot of need for more police, then we need more police. Walling off neighborhoods won't be an effective alternative.

 

[dairyair]

Oh please.
You can probably find some tic tocker spewing nonsense like that for clicks but most "Progs" don't think "no one should have police on the streets".

There's ignorant posts that happen daily.

 

[Ouroboros]

LOL. I don't sneer at it. It's about as good a solution as a bandaid is to a sliced artery. It's very temporary and not a solution.

Unless we wall off the E, W coasts. Canada. The entire Gulf.
Under the ground. And over our heads. All those are routes that can be used and walls at the southern border does nothing to address those other routes.

No measure can be totally successful to prevent lawbreaking, that much is true. However, if a country does not create impediments to lawbreaking, that in itself encourages people to break the law. Building the wall is one such impediment, but we need others. I feel it likely that a lot of people considering illegal entry gave the matter a second thought or two when they heard rumors of Alligator Alcatraz.

What prompted such an ignorant sentence about police on the streets? Can you remain on the topic?

If there is a lot of need for more police, then we need more police. Walling off neighborhoods won't be an effective alternative.

The statement is not ignorant in the least. It's only been five years since Dems were making all sorts of noises about defunding cops and bringing in social workers to handle crises, and some of them are STILL going on about how terrible cops are. Which some may be, but the Lib idea that you can pat crooks on the head and let them go their merry way is a direct parallel with Lib lack of concern for illegal incursions.

 

[dairyair]

No measure can be totally successful to prevent lawbreaking, that much is true. However, if a country does not create impediments to lawbreaking, that in itself encourages people to break the law. Building the wall is one such impediment, but we need others. I feel it likely that a lot of people considering illegal entry gave the matter a second thought or two when they heard rumors of Alligator Alcatraz.


The statement is not ignorant in the least. It's only been five years since Dems were making all sorts of noises about defunding cops and bringing in social workers to handle crises, and some of them are STILL going on about how terrible cops are. Which some may be, but the Lib idea that you can pat crooks on the head and let them go their merry way is a direct parallel with Lib lack of concern for illegal incursions.

A mostly worthless solution. And a very expensive worthless solution.
Stop the reason they come here would be far far far more effective.

Most coming here are not breaking the law. They come seeking refuge or asylum. All perfectly legal.

It is of utmost ignorance. It's also shows your position as weak. Putting words in other people's mouths. A worthless ignorant debate technique.

 

[ClaraD]

Seriously? An opinion piece?



By a RW foundation.

If you want to take the conspiracy theory position, so be it.

But you clearly don't know the difference between legal and illegal

I fought for no one.
You admit to your losing position when you have to resort to ad homs so you can feel better about your bad opinions.

Not only a right wing nut job foundation, but the writers of project 2025

 

[TamleeB]

Three more innocent American’s loose their lives at the hands of an illegal immigrant.

MSN

 

[Michael Cole]

White folk arrested for child endangerment and sex offender violation.



Think of the children. Deport all white folk.

Lookie here. More white folk abusing children.



Back to Europe you go.

 

[Ouroboros]

A mostly worthless solution. And a very expensive worthless solution.
Stop the reason they come here would be far far far more effective.

Most coming here are not breaking the law. They come seeking refuge or asylum. All perfectly legal.

It is of utmost ignorance. It's also shows your position as weak. Putting words in other people's mouths. A worthless ignorant debate technique.

What words did I put in anyone's mouths? Be specific. If you cannot, that would prove your ignorance.

"Stop the reason they come here"-- right, that was Kamala's solution: get American companies to invest in places like El Salvador and MAYBE illegals with stop coming. Is that the "reason" you're thinking of? If you can't specify, that too indicates ignorance.

 

[Ouroboros]

Three more innocent American’s loose their lives at the hands of an illegal immigrant.

MSN

Sanctuary states: the gifts that keep on giving--death.

 

[dairyair]

What words did I put in anyone's mouths? Be specific. If you cannot, that would prove your ignorance.

"Stop the reason they come here"-- right, that was Kamala's solution: get American companies to invest in places like El Salvador and MAYBE illegals with stop coming. Is that the "reason" you're thinking of? If you can't specify, that too indicates ignorance.

The point is only false to you because you automatically sneer at anything that impedes the invasion of illegals. Are you also of the opinion that no one should have police on the streets because the police don't manage to prevent every crime?

Now this must prove your ignorance.
You made up something because your point is very very weak.

Now you double down on making up nonsense.