thinkforyoursel
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,095
- Reaction score
- 314
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Essentially both Stop & Frisk and Obama's NSA surveillance program comes down to ....search millions of innocent people ...to find that one or two bad actors.
I have to ask why would somebody be for S&F ...and then scream bloody murder over Obama's NSA program?
Is the answer to this question as simple as .......I'm not black ...so S&F ...don't affect me?
Hmmmm...
These two programs are nothing alike.
I agree ...S&F ...don't affects whites. That's the essential difference.
They're both illegal. But how do you prevent a super secret agency from spying on you?
Stop and frisk is used on any individual that looks like a gang banger. What does a gang banger look like? baggy pants, etc sterotypical crap. That makes it wrong.Well no, the essential difference lies in the means and ends of both programs. They really are nothing alike, and to generalize them both as being programs in which "millions of innocents are searched in order to find one or two bad actors" is just wrong.
I agree ....but the media only call the NSA program illegal!!
It only shows that the media, the politicians...and the American people are all a-wash in the same stinking-pot!!
The people running around screaming the loudest over the NSA program are the very same people most likely to turn right around and defend the S&F program.
Nobody gets to call themselves clean ..if you objectively look at the situation.
The media is run by liberals. And stop and frisk gets rid of guns in possession of those who shouldn't have guns. But it's still wrong and illegal. Liberals spend too much time thinking with their emotions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?