Except for all indications the opposite would be true. A second Trump term would have caused investors to run for the hills, confident theGood point about inflation, that would have still pushed up prices regardless of what else was going on in the oil industry. The supply chain issues aren't helping at all, at all! But I'll stick with my "Lower" vote, just because of how a second Trump term would be more favorable to the oil industry.
If Trump were in office now, we would not have done shit to Russia for invading Ukraine and Trump and his defenders would be telling us all how corrupt Ukraine is, how Democrats want us in another forever war and so on.
Oh the irony.
Again, your parroting unsubstantiated alt-right MSM propaganda. Can you produce any verifiable data that supports this claim?
Keystone Pipeline would of transported Canadian crude to the gulf coast where most of the refined product would of been shipped overseas having very little affect on u.s. petrol prices.
Here you show your lack of understanding on what energy Independence actually means. First, one needs to to add up all of our energy production (oil, natural gas, coal, renewables) and then subtract our net energy consumption. The U.S. is a net exporter of coal and natural gas, so it really comes down to the petroleum balance.
U.S. net imports have been declining since 2005 as a result of hydraulic fracturing. That year, U.S. net imports of petroleum and petroleum products (e.g., gasoline, diesel, jet fuel) averaged 12.5 million barrels per day (BPD). By the time President Obama left office, the number had declined to 4.8 million BPD . During Obama’s last full month in office, the number was 4.2 million BPD. When donald took over, the downward trend continued. During donalds last year in office, the net import number turned negative. It is therefore true that we gained energy independence (per this definition of net imports) under donald. Net exports in 2020 averaged 635,000 BPD for the year.
However, when the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in widespread stay-at-home orders, U.S. energy demand and energy production both plummeted. For the first four months of 2020, net exports averaged one million BPD. But then by May we had to start importing again. In May and June the U.S. imported three quarters of a million BPD. In the second half of the year, net imports once again became net exports. For the full year of 2020, the U.S. became a net exporter for the first time in modern history.
In 2021, we oscillated between net imports and net exports on a month-to-month basis. In certain months, we were net importers (and hence, lost our “energy independence” per that definition). In other months, we were a significant net exporter.
What wasn’t clear was whether the U.S. would be a net exporter for the entire year of 2021. But the Energy Information Administration recently posted the numbers for December, and we now have an answer. Net exports grew each month from September through December to push the final average for the year to a net export number of 162,000 BPD. That is significantly down from 2020, but it is still energy independent according to the net export definition.
In 2021, we oscillated between net imports and net exports on a month-to-month basis. In certain months, we were net importers (and hence, lost our “energy independence” per that definition). In other months, we were a significant net exporter.
Surprise! The U.S. Is Still Energy Independent
The Energy Information Administration recently posted December export numbers that showed the U.S remained energy independent in 2021.www.forbes.com
.
There's no way to know the answer to the thread title question.Let's suppose that Trump had won the 2020 election and was now serving his 2nd term, would gas prices still be as high as they are and rising with Biden in office?
No, there aren't. You want to cover for yer buddy Vladimir, that's all.Gosh, there are some odd things within this paragraph!
I bet you can do better than writing silly comments like that one. If that's what you have to offer, why even bother?No, there aren't. You want to cover for yer buddy Vladimir, that's all.
I respond in kind.I bet you can do better than writing silly comments like that one. If that's what you have to offer, why even bother?
LOL ! Appreciate all of the supporting links you included to avoid giving readers the impression your post is "all Hat, no Cattle"!
CORRECTED-U.S. oil drillers cut rigs for seventh consecutive ...
https://www.reuters.com › article › usa-rigs-baker-hugh...
Dec 6, 2019 — Drillers cut five oil rigs in the week to Dec. 6, bringing the total count down to 663, the lowest since April 2017, energy services firm ...
US drillers add oil and gas rigs for ninth time in 10 weeks
https://www.reuters.com › world › us-drillers-add-oil-gas-...
2 days ago — The oil and gas rig count, an early indicator of future output, rose 13 to 663 in the week to March 11, its highest since April 2020, ...
Putin had no fear of his own POODLE...
What if questions are impossible to prove or know what would have happened because it never did. The situation and circumstances today would be completely different. By that I mean the XL-pipeline wouldn’t have been canceled, so it would have been carrying oil from Canada to Texas. Leases to drill on federal land would have been much easier to obtain and keep. There might be a few other things I missed, but I don’t see these making that much of a difference. I do think the big difference is Trump was trying to make the U.S. as energy independent whereas Biden and company began to make us more reliant on foreign oil. Probably to appease their green energy and climate change base.Let's suppose that Trump had won the 2020 election and was now serving his 2nd term, would gas prices still be as high as they are and rising with Biden in office?
I read recently that a second term for trump would have meant a departure from NATO. Now just imagine that and Putin threats of nukes. By now we would either could not afford gas or money would be pointless, something like that.The sanctions against Russian oil that Republicans say they were for wouldn’t have happened, so probably not. It’s why I started a poll asking people if they would agree to a temporary rise in prices if the United States blocked Russian oil, and a completely bipartisan majority of the forum agreed that they would.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?