- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,667
- Reaction score
- 75,614
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
you are free to have that meanignless opinion and the great thing about rights and freedom, gays being granted equal rights wont effect your freedom to have your opinion. You get to keep it. Its a shame your views dont value that though.
If we could take the vibe on this thread and put it in a bottle, we would have an incredibly deadly poison.
the vibe in thie thread isnt posin at all, the vast majority support, understand and want equal rights. thats AWESOME!
the very small minority view (the real poison) do not and thier bigotry and or opposition to equal rights doesnt really matter because equal rights is w
So, he's free to not marry gaily?
1.)I was talking about people's lack of manners or respect toward each other. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean you're allowed to be a jackass.
3.) I know that it's insane for me to expect civility from anonymous internet users, but you really shouldn't call people's opinions meaningless just because they disagree with you.
4.) I think that you in particular need to stop behaving like a four-year-old. Or, at the very least, install Spellcheck and learn how to be funny while you're being an ass.
1.) respect is earned. A basic level is given but after that its earned
2.) well if we were talking about "disagreeing" I guess that would matter but we are not. and in no way was i a jackass lol unless stating facts make me one then i'm guilty as charged
3.) again thats not why his opinions are meanignless, also notice i called my own meanignless because this isnt about "agreeing" its about facts and what he said was factually wrong and his opinions are 100% meaningless to rights. they dont matter. He is free to have them but they dont matter
4.) no thanks im good its funny seeing people get upset over facts that prove them wrong because its a trait i simply don't understand since its illogical
please stay on topic, failed insults wont change his post from being factually wrong, thanks in advance
I have to say, that's a better comeback than what I expected. Well done. Still full of errors, but we can't be perfect, now can we?
another posts and nothing but deflections and failed insults. Thats what i thought.
Let us know when you have anythign that matters thanks.
1.)This isn't a matter of rights.
2.)This is a matter of belief of definition.
I don't think marriage should have any legal standing whatsoever.
This isn't a matter of rights. This is a matter of belief of definition.
What do people not understand about the fact that marriage is the only method of creating the legal family relationship of "spouse", and by extension "inlaws". These legal relationships only exist because the government recognizes them. Heck, "in-laws" even says it right there. It is very little different than a birth certificate or adoption papers establishing the relationships of "parent and child", which is where we get much of our legal relationships from.
The government providing the marriage license allows easy tracking of spouses and efficient recognition, especially given the laws that allow for many things that would require a whole lot of other costly legal paperwork to already be taken care of automatically (as most who want to be someone else's spouse want) with just that single document. Plus, without marriage, there would be a whole lot more legal cases because so few things would be established by law that each individual case would need to be heard to determine who should get what. It would be a mess. Legal marriage recognition helps to clear that mess up to procedure and established laws.
I'm not saying don't have anything of the sort, but marriage should be a wholly religious thing. I understand what being married legally entails. They should just call it something else. Call it a civil union when people are married legally. I'm saying people should be able to be married religiously without being married legally and be able to be married legally but not necessarily religiously.
I'm not saying don't have anything of the sort, but marriage should be a wholly religious thing. I understand what being married legally entails. They should just call it something else. Call it a civil union when people are married legally. I'm saying people should be able to be married religiously without being married legally and be able to be married legally but not necessarily religiously.
I'm not saying don't have anything of the sort, but marriage should be a wholly religious thing. I understand what being married legally entails. They should just call it something else. Call it a civil union when people are married legally. I'm saying people should be able to be married religiously without being married legally and be able to be married legally but not necessarily religiously.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?